Indian Bright Steel Company Limited
Indian Bright Steel Company Limited (IBRIGST.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IBRIGST.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBRIGST.BO | ₹153.50 | -0.26% | 153.5M | -152.13 | -₹1.01 | N/A |
| JSWSTEEL.NS | ₹1,280.60 | +2.08% | 3.1T | 41.95 | ₹30.39 | +0.22% |
| JSWSTEEL.BO | ₹1,280.60 | +2.08% | 3.1T | 41.83 | ₹30.48 | +0.22% |
| TATASTEEL.BO | ₹215.25 | +2.92% | 2.7T | 39.39 | ₹5.45 | +1.68% |
| TATASTEEL.NS | ₹215.52 | +3.06% | 2.7T | 0.34 | ₹632.04 | +1.68% |
| JINDALSTEL.BO | ₹1,260.65 | +2.23% | 1.3T | 65.07 | ₹19.47 | +0.16% |
| JINDALSTEL.NS | ₹1,261.00 | +2.25% | 1.3T | 65.05 | ₹19.47 | +0.16% |
| NMDC.BO | ₹82.45 | +2.13% | 719.8B | 10.43 | ₹7.85 | +4.28% |
| NMDC.NS | ₹82.56 | +2.18% | 719.7B | 10.43 | ₹7.85 | +4.28% |
| SAIL.NS | ₹165.51 | +3.33% | 681.2B | 26.64 | ₹6.19 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
IBRIGST.BO vs JSWSTEEL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JSWSTEEL.NS trades at ₹1,280.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JSWSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JSWSTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JSWSTEEL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JSWSTEEL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.BO has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JSWSTEEL.BO trades at ₹1,280.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JSWSTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.83. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JSWSTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JSWSTEEL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs TATASTEEL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TATASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while TATASTEEL.BO trades at ₹215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas TATASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TATASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check TATASTEEL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs TATASTEEL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TATASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while TATASTEEL.NS trades at ₹215.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas TATASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TATASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check TATASTEEL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JINDALSTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JINDALSTEL.BO trades at ₹1,260.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JINDALSTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 65.07. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JINDALSTEL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JINDALSTEL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JINDALSTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JINDALSTEL.NS trades at ₹1,261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JINDALSTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.05. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JINDALSTEL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JINDALSTEL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs NMDC.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, NMDC.BO has a market cap of 719.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while NMDC.BO trades at ₹82.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas NMDC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NMDC.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to NMDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check NMDC.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs NMDC.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, NMDC.NS has a market cap of 719.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while NMDC.NS trades at ₹82.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas NMDC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NMDC.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to NMDC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check NMDC.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SAIL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SAIL.NS has a market cap of 681.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SAIL.NS trades at ₹165.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SAIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SAIL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SAIL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SAIL.BO has a market cap of 681.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SAIL.BO trades at ₹165.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SAIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SAIL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs LLOYDSME.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, LLOYDSME.NS has a market cap of 662.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while LLOYDSME.NS trades at ₹1,261.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas LLOYDSME.NS's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LLOYDSME.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check LLOYDSME.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JSL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JSL.NS has a market cap of 661.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JSL.NS trades at ₹809.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JSL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JSL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JSL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs LLOYDSME.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, LLOYDSME.BO has a market cap of 661.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while LLOYDSME.BO trades at ₹1,263.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas LLOYDSME.BO's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LLOYDSME.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check LLOYDSME.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JSL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JSL.BO has a market cap of 660.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JSL.BO trades at ₹809.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JSL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JSL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JSL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs APLAPOLLO.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.BO has a market cap of 619.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while APLAPOLLO.BO trades at ₹2,221.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas APLAPOLLO.BO's P/E ratio is 54.14. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to APLAPOLLO.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check APLAPOLLO.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs APLAPOLLO.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.NS has a market cap of 619.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while APLAPOLLO.NS trades at ₹2,226.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas APLAPOLLO.NS's P/E ratio is 54.23. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to APLAPOLLO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check APLAPOLLO.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SHYAMMETL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.NS has a market cap of 240.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SHYAMMETL.NS trades at ₹856.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SHYAMMETL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHYAMMETL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SHYAMMETL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SHYAMMETL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.BO has a market cap of 239.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SHYAMMETL.BO trades at ₹857.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SHYAMMETL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHYAMMETL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SHYAMMETL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs WELCORP.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, WELCORP.NS has a market cap of 210.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while WELCORP.NS trades at ₹822.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas WELCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WELCORP.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to WELCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check WELCORP.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs WELCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, WELCORP.BO has a market cap of 210.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while WELCORP.BO trades at ₹824.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas WELCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WELCORP.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to WELCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check WELCORP.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs KIOCL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, KIOCL.BO has a market cap of 206.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while KIOCL.BO trades at ₹343.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas KIOCL.BO's P/E ratio is -280.45. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KIOCL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to KIOCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check KIOCL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs KIOCL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, KIOCL.NS has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while KIOCL.NS trades at ₹342.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas KIOCL.NS's P/E ratio is -280.12. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KIOCL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to KIOCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check KIOCL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SARDAEN.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SARDAEN.NS has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SARDAEN.NS trades at ₹518.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SARDAEN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SARDAEN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SARDAEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SARDAEN.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SARDAEN.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SARDAEN.BO has a market cap of 187.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SARDAEN.BO trades at ₹516.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SARDAEN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SARDAEN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SARDAEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SARDAEN.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs GPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GPIL.NS has a market cap of 175.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while GPIL.NS trades at ₹272.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas GPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to GPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check GPIL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs GPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GPIL.BO has a market cap of 175.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while GPIL.BO trades at ₹272.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas GPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to GPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check GPIL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs RATNAMANI.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, RATNAMANI.BO has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while RATNAMANI.BO trades at ₹2,362.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas RATNAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RATNAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to RATNAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check RATNAMANI.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs RATNAMANI.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, RATNAMANI.NS has a market cap of 169B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while RATNAMANI.NS trades at ₹2,364.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas RATNAMANI.NS's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RATNAMANI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to RATNAMANI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check RATNAMANI.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs GALLANTT.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GALLANTT.NS has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while GALLANTT.NS trades at ₹583.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas GALLANTT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GALLANTT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check GALLANTT.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs GALLANTT.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GALLANTT.BO has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while GALLANTT.BO trades at ₹583.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas GALLANTT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GALLANTT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to GALLANTT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check GALLANTT.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JSLHISAR.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JSLHISAR.NS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JSLHISAR.NS trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JSLHISAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JSLHISAR.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to JSLHISAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JSLHISAR.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs USHAMART.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, USHAMART.NS has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while USHAMART.NS trades at ₹425.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas USHAMART.NS's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USHAMART.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to USHAMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check USHAMART.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs USHAMART.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, USHAMART.BO has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while USHAMART.BO trades at ₹422.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas USHAMART.BO's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USHAMART.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to USHAMART.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check USHAMART.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JINDALSAW.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JINDALSAW.BO has a market cap of 120B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JINDALSAW.BO trades at ₹187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JINDALSAW.BO's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JINDALSAW.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JINDALSAW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JINDALSAW.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JINDALSAW.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JINDALSAW.NS has a market cap of 119.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JINDALSAW.NS trades at ₹188.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JINDALSAW.NS's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JINDALSAW.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JINDALSAW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JINDALSAW.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs NSLNISP.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, NSLNISP.BO has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while NSLNISP.BO trades at ₹40.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas NSLNISP.BO's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NSLNISP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check NSLNISP.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs NSLNISP.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, NSLNISP.NS has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while NSLNISP.NS trades at ₹40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas NSLNISP.NS's P/E ratio is -14.21. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NSLNISP.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check NSLNISP.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs LLOYDSENT.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, LLOYDSENT.NS has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while LLOYDSENT.NS trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas LLOYDSENT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LLOYDSENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check LLOYDSENT.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JAYNECOIND.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.BO has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JAYNECOIND.BO trades at ₹77.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JAYNECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JAYNECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JAYNECOIND.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JAYNECOIND.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.NS has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JAYNECOIND.NS trades at ₹78.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JAYNECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JAYNECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JAYNECOIND.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MAHSEAMLES.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.BO has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MAHSEAMLES.BO trades at ₹568.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MAHSEAMLES.BO's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MAHSEAMLES.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MAHSEAMLES.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.NS has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MAHSEAMLES.NS trades at ₹567.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MAHSEAMLES.NS's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MAHSEAMLES.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs IMFA.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, IMFA.NS has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while IMFA.NS trades at ₹1,274.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas IMFA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMFA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to IMFA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check IMFA.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs IMFA.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, IMFA.BO has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while IMFA.BO trades at ₹1,268.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas IMFA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMFA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to IMFA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check IMFA.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MIDHANI.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MIDHANI.NS has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MIDHANI.NS trades at ₹353.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MIDHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 58.99. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MIDHANI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to MIDHANI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MIDHANI.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MIDHANI.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MIDHANI.BO has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MIDHANI.BO trades at ₹352.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MIDHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 59.26. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MIDHANI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to MIDHANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MIDHANI.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JAIBALAJI.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.BO has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JAIBALAJI.BO trades at ₹71.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JAIBALAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JAIBALAJI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JAIBALAJI.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JAIBALAJI.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.NS has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JAIBALAJI.NS trades at ₹72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JAIBALAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JAIBALAJI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JAIBALAJI.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SURYAROSNI.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.BO has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SURYAROSNI.BO trades at ₹223.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SURYAROSNI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SURYAROSNI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SURYAROSNI.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SURYAROSNI.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.NS has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SURYAROSNI.NS trades at ₹223.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SURYAROSNI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SURYAROSNI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SURYAROSNI.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs TINPLATE.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TINPLATE.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while TINPLATE.NS trades at ₹430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas TINPLATE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TINPLATE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to TINPLATE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check TINPLATE.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs TINPLATE.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TINPLATE.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while TINPLATE.BO trades at ₹430.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas TINPLATE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TINPLATE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to TINPLATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check TINPLATE.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SUNFLAG.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SUNFLAG.NS has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SUNFLAG.NS trades at ₹249.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SUNFLAG.NS's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SUNFLAG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SUNFLAG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SUNFLAG.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SUNFLAG.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SUNFLAG.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SUNFLAG.BO trades at ₹248.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SUNFLAG.BO's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SUNFLAG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SUNFLAG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SUNFLAG.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs ELECTCAST.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, ELECTCAST.NS has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while ELECTCAST.NS trades at ₹69.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas ELECTCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELECTCAST.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to ELECTCAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check ELECTCAST.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs ELECTCAST.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, ELECTCAST.BO has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while ELECTCAST.BO trades at ₹69.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas ELECTCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELECTCAST.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to ELECTCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check ELECTCAST.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs BANSALWIRE.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, BANSALWIRE.NS has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while BANSALWIRE.NS trades at ₹264.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas BANSALWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BANSALWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to BANSALWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check BANSALWIRE.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs GOODLUCK.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GOODLUCK.NS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while GOODLUCK.NS trades at ₹1,195.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas GOODLUCK.NS's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GOODLUCK.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to GOODLUCK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check GOODLUCK.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs GOODLUCK.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, GOODLUCK.BO has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while GOODLUCK.BO trades at ₹1,195.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas GOODLUCK.BO's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GOODLUCK.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to GOODLUCK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check GOODLUCK.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs TATASTLLP.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TATASTLLP.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while TATASTLLP.NS trades at ₹829.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas TATASTLLP.NS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TATASTLLP.NS's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to TATASTLLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check TATASTLLP.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs ISMTLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, ISMTLTD.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while ISMTLTD.NS trades at ₹121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas ISMTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ISMTLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check ISMTLTD.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs ISMTLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, ISMTLTD.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while ISMTLTD.BO trades at ₹119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas ISMTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ISMTLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check ISMTLTD.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs TATAMETALI.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TATAMETALI.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while TATAMETALI.BO trades at ₹1,111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas TATAMETALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TATAMETALI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check TATAMETALI.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs TATAMETALI.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, TATAMETALI.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while TATAMETALI.NS trades at ₹1,110.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas TATAMETALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TATAMETALI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check TATAMETALI.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SANDUMA.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SANDUMA.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SANDUMA.BO trades at ₹220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SANDUMA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SANDUMA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to SANDUMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SANDUMA.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SANDUMA.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SANDUMA.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SANDUMA.NS trades at ₹219.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SANDUMA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SANDUMA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to SANDUMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SANDUMA.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs KSL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, KSL.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while KSL.NS trades at ₹752.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas KSL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KSL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to KSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check KSL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs KSL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, KSL.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while KSL.BO trades at ₹752.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas KSL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KSL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to KSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check KSL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MANINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MANINDS.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MANINDS.NS trades at ₹456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MANINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MANINDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MANINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MANINDS.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MANINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MANINDS.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MANINDS.BO trades at ₹448.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MANINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MANINDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MANINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MANINDS.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SAMBHV.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SAMBHV.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SAMBHV.NS trades at ₹100.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SAMBHV.NS's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SAMBHV.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SAMBHV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SAMBHV.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MAITHANALL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MAITHANALL.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MAITHANALL.NS trades at ₹1,026.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MAITHANALL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MAITHANALL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to MAITHANALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MAITHANALL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MAITHANALL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MAITHANALL.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MAITHANALL.BO trades at ₹1,024.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MAITHANALL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MAITHANALL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to MAITHANALL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MAITHANALL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹5,002.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is 298.19. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JTLIND.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JTLIND.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JTLIND.BO trades at ₹63.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JTLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JTLIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JTLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JTLIND.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JTLIND.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JTLIND.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JTLIND.NS trades at ₹63.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JTLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JTLIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JTLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JTLIND.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs WELSPLSOL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, WELSPLSOL.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while WELSPLSOL.BO trades at ₹36.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas WELSPLSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 107.20. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WELSPLSOL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to WELSPLSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check WELSPLSOL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs PRAKASH.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, PRAKASH.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while PRAKASH.NS trades at ₹135.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas PRAKASH.NS's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PRAKASH.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check PRAKASH.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs PRAKASH.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, PRAKASH.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while PRAKASH.BO trades at ₹135.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas PRAKASH.BO's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PRAKASH.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to PRAKASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check PRAKASH.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs VSSL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, VSSL.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while VSSL.BO trades at ₹258.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas VSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VSSL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to VSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check VSSL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs VSSL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, VSSL.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while VSSL.NS trades at ₹259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas VSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VSSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to VSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check VSSL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs STEELCAS.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, STEELCAS.NS has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while STEELCAS.NS trades at ₹230.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas STEELCAS.NS's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STEELCAS.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to STEELCAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check STEELCAS.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs VENUSPIPES.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while VENUSPIPES.NS trades at ₹1,081.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas VENUSPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VENUSPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check VENUSPIPES.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs VENUSPIPES.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while VENUSPIPES.BO trades at ₹1,066.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas VENUSPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VENUSPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check VENUSPIPES.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs RAJRATAN.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, RAJRATAN.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while RAJRATAN.NS trades at ₹421.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas RAJRATAN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RAJRATAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to RAJRATAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check RAJRATAN.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs RAJRATAN.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, RAJRATAN.BO has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while RAJRATAN.BO trades at ₹422.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas RAJRATAN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RAJRATAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to RAJRATAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check RAJRATAN.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs RHETAN.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, RHETAN.NS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while RHETAN.NS trades at ₹26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas RHETAN.NS's P/E ratio is 525.20. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RHETAN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to RHETAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check RHETAN.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs RHETAN.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, RHETAN.BO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while RHETAN.BO trades at ₹26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas RHETAN.BO's P/E ratio is 520.00. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RHETAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to RHETAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check RHETAN.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MUKANDLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MUKANDLTD.NS trades at ₹133.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MUKANDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MUKANDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MUKANDLTD.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MUKANDLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MUKANDLTD.BO trades at ₹133.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MUKANDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MUKANDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MUKANDLTD.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs JSWISPL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, JSWISPL.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while JSWISPL.NS trades at ₹38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas JSWISPL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JSWISPL.NS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to JSWISPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check JSWISPL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs HITECH.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, HITECH.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while HITECH.NS trades at ₹88.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas HITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HITECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to HITECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check HITECH.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs HITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, HITECH.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while HITECH.BO trades at ₹88.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas HITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to HITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check HITECH.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MSPL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MSPL.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MSPL.NS trades at ₹31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MSPL.NS's P/E ratio is -18.84. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSPL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MSPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MSPL.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MSPL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MSPL.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MSPL.BO trades at ₹32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MSPL.BO's P/E ratio is -20.26. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSPL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MSPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MSPL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SALASAR.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SALASAR.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SALASAR.BO trades at ₹7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SALASAR.BO's P/E ratio is 79.10. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SALASAR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SALASAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SALASAR.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs SALASAR.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, SALASAR.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while SALASAR.NS trades at ₹7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas SALASAR.NS's P/E ratio is 78.90. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SALASAR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to SALASAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check SALASAR.NS's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MAHASTEEL.BO Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MAHASTEEL.BO trades at ₹779.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MAHASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 116.90. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MAHASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is less volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MAHASTEEL.BO's competition here
IBRIGST.BO vs MAHASTEEL.NS Comparison February 2026
IBRIGST.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IBRIGST.BO stands at 153.5M. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IBRIGST.BO is priced at ₹153.50, while MAHASTEEL.NS trades at ₹775.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IBRIGST.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -152.13, whereas MAHASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 116.39. In terms of profitability, IBRIGST.BO's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MAHASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IBRIGST.BO is more volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IBRIGST.BO.Check MAHASTEEL.NS's competition here