IAC Inc. Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued
IAC Inc. Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued IACVV Peers
See (IACVV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IACVV | $40.24 | +0.65% | 3.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GOOGL | $166.64 | -3.85% | 2T | 18.89 | $8.82 | +0.48% |
| GOOG | $167.73 | -3.59% | 2T | 18.70 | $8.97 | +0.48% |
| META | $682.35 | -1.93% | 1.7T | 26.64 | $25.61 | +0.30% |
| SPOT | $707.79 | -0.34% | 142.2B | 109.40 | $6.47 | N/A |
| DASH | $220.46 | -0.05% | 93.4B | 279.06 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | N/A | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $83.62 | -1.09% | 29B | 8.28 | $10.10 | N/A |
| TME | $18.47 | -0.75% | 29B | 21.73 | $0.85 | +0.97% |
| RDDT | $139.09 | -1.47% | 25.7B | 27.87 | $4.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IACVV vs GOOGL Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GOOGL trades at $166.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs GOOG Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GOOG trades at $167.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs META Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while META trades at $682.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas META's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SPOT Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SPOT trades at $707.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 109.40. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs DASH Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while DASH trades at $220.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 279.06. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TWTR Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs BIDU Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while BIDU trades at $83.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TME Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TME trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs RDDT Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while RDDT trades at $139.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs PINS Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while PINS trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TWLO Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TWLO trades at $116.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -506.65. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs Z Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while Z trades at $68.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -194.97. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ZG Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ZG trades at $66.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -190.34. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs YNDX Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SNAP Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SNAP trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -25.82. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs NBIS Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while NBIS trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs MTCH Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while MTCH trades at $30.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs DJT Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while DJT trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs DJTWW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while DJTWW trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs CARG Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while CARG trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 86.76. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs IAC Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while IAC trades at $37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs WB Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while WB trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs GENI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GENI trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -50.63. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs YELP Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while YELP trades at $34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs YY Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs DOYU Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while DOYU trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs NN Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while NN trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.35. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs GRPN Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GRPN trades at $36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -36.44. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs MOMO Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while MOMO trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ANGIV Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TBLAW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TBLAW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TBLA Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TBLA trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 88.00. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs FVRR Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while FVRR trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 60.49. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs EVER Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 873.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while EVER trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs JFIN Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 844.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while JFIN trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs OPRA Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 806.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while OPRA trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs NNAVW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 801M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while NNAVW trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ATHM Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 762.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ATHM trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs GETY Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 760.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GETY trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs MAX Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 719.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while MAX trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ANGI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 719.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ANGI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SSTK Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 648M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SSTK trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SMWB Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SMWB trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -32.73. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs KIND Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 585.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while KIND trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs THRY Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while THRY trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TTGT Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 489.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TTGT trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs PERI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 426.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while PERI trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -52.61. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs UPXI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while UPXI trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ZH Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ZH trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -120.33. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs AREN Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while AREN trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TRVG Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 273.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TRVG trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs OB Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SEAT Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SEAT trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -63.50. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TRUE Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TRUE trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs JOYY Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 128.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while JOYY trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.10. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ILLR Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ILLR trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ILLRW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ILLRW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ASST Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ASST trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs BZFD Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while BZFD trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs CCG Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while CCG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs BODY Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ZDGE Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ZDGE trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -30.42. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs PODC Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while PODC trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs IZEA Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while IZEA trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs GIFT Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GIFT trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs EGLX Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs MNY Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while MNY trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs NAMI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while NAMI trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs BODI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while BODI trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SCOR Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SCOR trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SEATW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SEATW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LTRPA Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LTRPB Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LCFYW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LCFYW trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -155.84. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LYL Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs HRYU Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LIZI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs FAZE Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SOGP Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SOGP trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LKCO Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs KRKR Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while KRKR trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs QTT Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LOV Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ONFO Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ONFO trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ROI Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs LCFY Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while LCFY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SLE Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SLE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs CRTD Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while CRTD trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs CMCM Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while CMCM trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs TC Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while TC trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs MNYWW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while MNYWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs STBX Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs FAZEW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs ONFOW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 646.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while ONFOW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SLGG Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs FENG Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 226.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while FENG trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs GROM Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs GROMW Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.
IACVV vs SFUN Comparison
IACVV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IACVV stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SFUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IACVV is priced at $40.24, while SFUN trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IACVV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFUN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, IACVV's ROE is N/A, compared to SFUN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IACVV is less volatile compared to SFUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IACVV.