Honeywell Automation India Limited
Honeywell Automation India Limited (HONAUT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HONAUT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HONAUT.BO | ₹27,635.55 | +1.51% | 244.3B | 48.34 | ₹571.71 | +0.39% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹7,064.50 | +3.97% | 1.1T | 40.54 | ₹174.26 | +0.52% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹7,060.80 | +3.95% | 1.1T | 40.52 | ₹174.25 | +0.52% |
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹667.80 | +0.52% | 1.1T | 93.40 | ₹7.15 | +0.20% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹667.30 | +0.48% | 1.1T | 93.20 | ₹7.16 | +0.20% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,234.20 | +0.33% | 774.2B | 52.16 | ₹23.66 | +0.81% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,234.20 | +0.26% | 774.2B | 51.94 | ₹23.76 | +0.81% |
| APARINDS.NS | ₹9,859.00 | +0.55% | 396B | 40.77 | ₹241.83 | +0.52% |
| APARINDS.BO | ₹9,850.65 | +0.56% | 395.7B | 40.75 | ₹241.76 | +0.52% |
| KEI.NS | ₹4,126.00 | +3.40% | 394.4B | 45.82 | ₹90.04 | +0.11% |
Stock Comparison
HONAUT.BO vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹7,064.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹7,060.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs CGPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹667.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 93.40. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹667.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 93.20. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 774.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,234.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 774.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,234.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 51.94. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs APARINDS.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 396B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹9,859.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs APARINDS.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 395.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹9,850.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs KEI.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 394.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while KEI.NS trades at ₹4,126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 45.82. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check KEI.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs KEI.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 394.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while KEI.BO trades at ₹4,124.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check KEI.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HONAUT.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 244.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹27,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 214.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹898.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 87.87. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹660.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹660.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 152.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹1,350.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹1,348.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs VGUARD.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹324.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 49.74. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs VGUARD.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹324.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 49.74. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs ARE&M.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹727.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs ARE&M.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹727.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹816.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹815.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs TRIL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check TRIL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs TRIL.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹570.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹570.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 46.37. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HEG.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HEG.BO trades at ₹488.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HEG.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HEG.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HEG.NS trades at ₹488.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HEG.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs STLTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, STLTECH.BO has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while STLTECH.BO trades at ₹179.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas STLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 2567.86. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STLTECH.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to STLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check STLTECH.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹8,443.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹8,433.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs TARIL.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 84B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹279.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs QPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹840.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 61.02. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs QPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹840.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 61.01. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹235.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹234.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹306.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.91. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹305.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 49.35. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹3,775.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹306.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹306.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HIRECT.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,512.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 51.57. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HIRECT.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,509.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 54.57. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs BBL.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,218.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check BBL.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs BBL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,213.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check BBL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹664.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹663.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs MARSONS.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹131.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,434.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 56.85. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹282.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 51.06. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹282.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HPL.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HPL.NS trades at ₹280.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HPL.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HPL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HPL.BO trades at ₹280.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HPL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 54.44. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹1,257.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹1,256.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs DYCL.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹262.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs DYCL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹261.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs EXICOM.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹86.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs EXICOM.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹85.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs MODINSU.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹222.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹547.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹546.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹128.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SALZER.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs MEIL.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹227.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs ELIN.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹106.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs ELIN.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹105.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹528.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs WSI.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while WSI.NS trades at ₹67.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is -144.45. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check WSI.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs RMC.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while RMC.BO trades at ₹393.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check RMC.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹331.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs AEPL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹121.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹120.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs DENORA.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹694.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs DENORA.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹691.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs HUIL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹495.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹189.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 71.07. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹372.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs DEL.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, DEL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while DEL.BO trades at ₹181.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas DEL.BO's P/E ratio is 64.73. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to DEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check DEL.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs SHERA.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs KAYCEEI.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹785.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs GEEKAYWIRE.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹286.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -39.47. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹283.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -39.21. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs PANCARBON.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, PANCARBON.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while PANCARBON.BO trades at ₹438.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas PANCARBON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PANCARBON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to PANCARBON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check PANCARBON.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs PANAENERG.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, PANAENERG.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while PANAENERG.BO trades at ₹269.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas PANAENERG.BO's P/E ratio is 68.91. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PANAENERG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to PANAENERG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check PANAENERG.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs LAKSELEC.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, LAKSELEC.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while LAKSELEC.BO trades at ₹750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas LAKSELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 68.43. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAKSELEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to LAKSELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check LAKSELEC.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs CORDSCABLE.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs CORDSCABLE.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹139.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs VETO.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, VETO.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while VETO.BO trades at ₹91.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas VETO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VETO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to VETO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check VETO.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs VETO.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, VETO.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while VETO.NS trades at ₹90.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas VETO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VETO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is more volatile compared to VETO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check VETO.NS's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs COSPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs APLAB.BO Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check APLAB.BO's competition here
HONAUT.BO vs GOLDSTAR.NS Comparison March 2026
HONAUT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HONAUT.BO stands at 244.3B. In comparison, GOLDSTAR.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HONAUT.BO is priced at ₹27,635.55, while GOLDSTAR.NS trades at ₹6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HONAUT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 48.34, whereas GOLDSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 74.44. In terms of profitability, HONAUT.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOLDSTAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HONAUT.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HONAUT.BO.Check GOLDSTAR.NS's competition here