Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HLT
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLT | $317.20 | +4.98% | 72.7B | 51.75 | $6.13 | +0.19% |
| MAR | $348.58 | +5.33% | 92.4B | 36.69 | $9.50 | +0.77% |
| IHG | $141.23 | +6.98% | 21.2B | 29.09 | $4.86 | +1.23% |
| HTHT | $53.74 | +3.89% | 16.5B | 23.16 | $2.32 | +3.28% |
| H | $151.68 | +4.68% | 14.5B | -275.89 | -$0.55 | +0.39% |
| WH | $83.09 | +2.31% | 6.2B | 33.24 | $2.50 | +1.99% |
| ATAT | $37.54 | +5.63% | 5.2B | 22.21 | $1.69 | +1.99% |
| CHH | $107.59 | +3.95% | 5B | 13.63 | $7.90 | +1.06% |
| SHCO | $8.99 | -0.11% | 1.8B | -21.93 | -$0.41 | N/A |
| MCG | $6.58 | -0.60% | 1.3B | -6.21 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLT vs MAR Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while MAR trades at $348.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check MAR's competition here
HLT vs IHG Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while IHG trades at $141.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check IHG's competition here
HLT vs HTHT Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while HTHT trades at $53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check HTHT's competition here
HLT vs H Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, H has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while H trades at $151.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas H's P/E ratio is -275.89. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to H's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check H's competition here
HLT vs WH Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while WH trades at $83.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check WH's competition here
HLT vs ATAT Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while ATAT trades at $37.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check ATAT's competition here
HLT vs CHH Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while CHH trades at $107.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CHH's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check CHH's competition here
HLT vs SHCO Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while SHCO trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -21.93. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check SHCO's competition here
HLT vs MCG Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check MCG's competition here
HLT vs GHG Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while GHG trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check GHG's competition here
HLT vs INTG Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while INTG trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -61.23. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check INTG's competition here
HLT vs SONDW Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 33.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while SONDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check SONDW's competition here
HLT vs LUXH Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while LUXH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check LUXH's competition here
HLT vs LUXHP Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 18.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while LUXHP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +23.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check LUXHP's competition here
HLT vs SOND Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while SOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check SOND's competition here
HLT vs HOT Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, HOT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while HOT trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas HOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to HOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check HOT's competition here
HLT vs STAY Comparison April 2026
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 72.7B. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $317.20, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 51.75, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.30%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.Check STAY's competition here