Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. HLT Peers
See (HLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLT | $260.64 | +2.73% | 61.2B | 40.74 | $6.32 | +0.23% |
| MAR | $271.60 | +2.11% | 73.8B | 30.67 | $8.79 | +0.95% |
| IHG | $115.21 | +1.30% | 17.7B | 29.74 | $3.86 | +2.46% |
| H | $138.80 | +1.24% | 13.3B | 17.55 | $7.91 | +0.43% |
| HTHT | $34.12 | +0.20% | 10.5B | 24.31 | $1.41 | +4.68% |
| WH | $81.33 | +2.30% | 6.2B | 19.23 | $4.20 | +1.96% |
| CHH | $127.44 | +1.44% | 5.9B | 19.45 | $6.53 | +0.91% |
| ATAT | $32.04 | -0.12% | 4.5B | 25.74 | $1.26 | +3.97% |
| SHCO | $7.36 | +1.03% | 1.4B | -12.46 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| MCG | $6.58 | -0.60% | 1.3B | -6.21 | -$1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLT vs MAR Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, MAR has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while MAR trades at $271.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas MAR's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MAR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to MAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs IHG Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, IHG has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while IHG trades at $115.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas IHG's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IHG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to IHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs H Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, H has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while H trades at $138.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas H's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to H's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to H. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs HTHT Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, HTHT has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while HTHT trades at $34.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas HTHT's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HTHT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to HTHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs WH Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, WH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while WH trades at $81.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas WH's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WH's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to WH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs CHH Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, CHH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while CHH trades at $127.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas CHH's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CHH's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to CHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs ATAT Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, ATAT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while ATAT trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas ATAT's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to ATAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs SHCO Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SHCO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while SHCO trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas SHCO's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SHCO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to SHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs MCG Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, MCG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while MCG trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas MCG's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MCG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to MCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs GHG Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, GHG has a market cap of 211.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while GHG trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas GHG's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to GHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs INTG Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, INTG has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while INTG trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas INTG's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to INTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs SOND Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SOND has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while SOND trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas SOND's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SOND's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to SOND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs SONDW Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, SONDW has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while SONDW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas SONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SONDW's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to SONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs LUXHP Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, LUXHP has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while LUXHP trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas LUXHP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LUXHP's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is less volatile compared to LUXHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs LUXH Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, LUXH has a market cap of 201.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while LUXH trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas LUXH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LUXH's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to LUXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.
HLT vs STAY Comparison
HLT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLT stands at 61.2B. In comparison, STAY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLT is priced at $260.64, while STAY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.74, whereas STAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLT's ROE is -0.43%, compared to STAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLT is more volatile compared to STAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLT.