Hinduja Global Solutions Limited

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SUNDARMHLD.NS has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SUNDARMHLD.NS trades at ₹684.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SUNDARMHLD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDARMHLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SUNDARMHLD.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BLS.BO has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while BLS.BO trades at ₹285.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas BLS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLS.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to BLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check BLS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BLS.NS has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while BLS.NS trades at ₹286.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas BLS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLS.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to BLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check BLS.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, CMSINFO.NS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while CMSINFO.NS trades at ₹310.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas CMSINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMSINFO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to CMSINFO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check CMSINFO.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, CMSINFO.BO has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while CMSINFO.BO trades at ₹310.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas CMSINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMSINFO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to CMSINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check CMSINFO.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PDSL.NS has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while PDSL.NS trades at ₹309.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas PDSL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to PDSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check PDSL.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PDSL.BO has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while PDSL.BO trades at ₹309.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas PDSL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PDSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to PDSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check PDSL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SEIL.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SEIL.BO trades at ₹190.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 740.00. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SEIL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, JAYKAY.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while JAYKAY.BO trades at ₹150.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas JAYKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 62.45. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAYKAY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to JAYKAY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check JAYKAY.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, HGS.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while HGS.BO trades at ₹380.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas HGS.BO's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HGS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to HGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check HGS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ALLSEC.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ALLSEC.NS trades at ₹1,084.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ALLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ALLSEC.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ALLSEC.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ALLSEC.BO trades at ₹1,080.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ALLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to ALLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ALLSEC.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BLIL.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while BLIL.BO trades at ₹72.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas BLIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to BLIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check BLIL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BLSE.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while BLSE.NS trades at ₹158.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas BLSE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLSE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to BLSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check BLSE.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ALLDIGI.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ALLDIGI.BO trades at ₹827.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ALLDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALLDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ALLDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ALLDIGI.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ONEPOINT.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ONEPOINT.NS trades at ₹47.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ONEPOINT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONEPOINT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ONEPOINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ONEPOINT.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ALLDIGI.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ALLDIGI.NS trades at ₹827.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ALLDIGI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALLDIGI.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ALLDIGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ALLDIGI.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, UDS.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while UDS.NS trades at ₹154.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas UDS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UDS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to UDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check UDS.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, UDS.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while UDS.BO trades at ₹154.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas UDS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UDS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to UDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check UDS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ASTAR.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ASTAR.BO trades at ₹637.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ASTAR.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, GKWLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while GKWLIMITED.NS trades at ₹1,667.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas GKWLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 137.39. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GKWLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to GKWLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check GKWLIMITED.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BLUSPRING.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while BLUSPRING.NS trades at ₹55.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas BLUSPRING.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLUSPRING.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to BLUSPRING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check BLUSPRING.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, KAPSTON.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while KAPSTON.NS trades at ₹394.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas KAPSTON.NS's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KAPSTON.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to KAPSTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check KAPSTON.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, EXHICON.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while EXHICON.BO trades at ₹549.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas EXHICON.BO's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXHICON.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to EXHICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check EXHICON.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, MADHUVEER.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while MADHUVEER.BO trades at ₹255.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas MADHUVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 705.14. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MADHUVEER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to MADHUVEER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check MADHUVEER.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, REPRO.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while REPRO.NS trades at ₹400.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas REPRO.NS's P/E ratio is -28.44. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REPRO.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to REPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check REPRO.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, REPRO.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while REPRO.BO trades at ₹399.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas REPRO.BO's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REPRO.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to REPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check REPRO.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ONEGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ONEGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹676.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ONEGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ONEGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ONEGLOBAL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RADIANTCMS.NS trades at ₹37.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RADIANTCMS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RADIANTCMS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RADIANTCMS.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RADIANTCMS.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RADIANTCMS.BO trades at ₹37.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RADIANTCMS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RADIANTCMS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to RADIANTCMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RADIANTCMS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, LIKHAMI.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while LIKHAMI.BO trades at ₹381.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas LIKHAMI.BO's P/E ratio is 1753.86. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIKHAMI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to LIKHAMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check LIKHAMI.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, MAJESAUT.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while MAJESAUT.BO trades at ₹321.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas MAJESAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAJESAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to MAJESAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check MAJESAUT.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, DJML.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while DJML.NS trades at ₹92.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas DJML.NS's P/E ratio is 37.91. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DJML.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to DJML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check DJML.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, DJML.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while DJML.BO trades at ₹92.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas DJML.BO's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DJML.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to DJML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check DJML.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, 531216.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while 531216.BO trades at ₹12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas 531216.BO's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 531216.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to 531216.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check 531216.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ALPHALOGIC.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ALPHALOGIC.BO trades at ₹41.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ALPHALOGIC.BO's P/E ratio is 43.12. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ALPHALOGIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ALPHALOGIC.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, COMFINTE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while COMFINTE.BO trades at ₹7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas COMFINTE.BO's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COMFINTE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to COMFINTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check COMFINTE.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RUCHINFRA.BO trades at ₹5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RUCHINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUCHINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RUCHINFRA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RUCHINFRA.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RUCHINFRA.NS trades at ₹5.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RUCHINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUCHINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RUCHINFRA.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SUPRAPFSL.BO has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SUPRAPFSL.BO trades at ₹28.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SUPRAPFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAPFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SUPRAPFSL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, TECHKGREEN.BO has a market cap of 907.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while TECHKGREEN.BO trades at ₹121.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas TECHKGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TECHKGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to TECHKGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check TECHKGREEN.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ISTRNETWK.BO has a market cap of 785.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ISTRNETWK.BO trades at ₹38.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ISTRNETWK.BO's P/E ratio is 59.23. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISTRNETWK.BO's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to ISTRNETWK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ISTRNETWK.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RIDDHICORP.BO has a market cap of 771.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RIDDHICORP.BO trades at ₹62.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RIDDHICORP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RIDDHICORP.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to RIDDHICORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RIDDHICORP.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, CHOKSILA.BO has a market cap of 765.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while CHOKSILA.BO trades at ₹103.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas CHOKSILA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHOKSILA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to CHOKSILA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check CHOKSILA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, VIVIDM.BO has a market cap of 706.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while VIVIDM.BO trades at ₹7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas VIVIDM.BO's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIVIDM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to VIVIDM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check VIVIDM.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ACCELERATE.BO has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ACCELERATE.BO trades at ₹193.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ACCELERATE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACCELERATE.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELERATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ACCELERATE.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, TRESCON.BO has a market cap of 600.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while TRESCON.BO trades at ₹8.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas TRESCON.BO's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRESCON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to TRESCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check TRESCON.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SHARIKA.BO has a market cap of 514.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SHARIKA.BO trades at ₹11.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SHARIKA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHARIKA.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SHARIKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SHARIKA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RITHWIKFMS.BO has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RITHWIKFMS.BO trades at ₹155.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RITHWIKFMS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to RITHWIKFMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RITHWIKFMS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, HILIKS.BO has a market cap of 473.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while HILIKS.BO trades at ₹43.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas HILIKS.BO's P/E ratio is 95.78. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HILIKS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to HILIKS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check HILIKS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PROMAX.BO has a market cap of 432.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while PROMAX.BO trades at ₹17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas PROMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PROMAX.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to PROMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check PROMAX.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, FUTSOL.BO has a market cap of 429.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while FUTSOL.BO trades at ₹41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas FUTSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 91.11. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUTSOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to FUTSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check FUTSOL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SUGALDAM.BO has a market cap of 428.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SUGALDAM.BO trades at ₹67.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SUGALDAM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUGALDAM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to SUGALDAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SUGALDAM.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, JTAPARIA.BO has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while JTAPARIA.BO trades at ₹23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas JTAPARIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JTAPARIA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to JTAPARIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check JTAPARIA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, VKAL.BO has a market cap of 362M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while VKAL.BO trades at ₹1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas VKAL.BO's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VKAL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to VKAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check VKAL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, WALCHPF.BO has a market cap of 326M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while WALCHPF.BO trades at ₹115.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas WALCHPF.BO's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WALCHPF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to WALCHPF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check WALCHPF.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PREMCAP.BO has a market cap of 320.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while PREMCAP.BO trades at ₹8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas PREMCAP.BO's P/E ratio is -144.33. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PREMCAP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to PREMCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check PREMCAP.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PADAMCO.BO has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while PADAMCO.BO trades at ₹2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas PADAMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PADAMCO.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to PADAMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check PADAMCO.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SUJALA.BO has a market cap of 317.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SUJALA.BO trades at ₹54.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SUJALA.BO's P/E ratio is -78.06. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUJALA.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SUJALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SUJALA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, MADHUSE.BO has a market cap of 311.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while MADHUSE.BO trades at ₹20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas MADHUSE.BO's P/E ratio is -34.15. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MADHUSE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to MADHUSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check MADHUSE.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, LIBORDFIN.BO has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while LIBORDFIN.BO trades at ₹18.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas LIBORDFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.67. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIBORDFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to LIBORDFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check LIBORDFIN.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PRISMX.BO has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while PRISMX.BO trades at ₹0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas PRISMX.BO's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRISMX.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to PRISMX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check PRISMX.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SVS.BO has a market cap of 269.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SVS.BO trades at ₹12.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SVS.BO's P/E ratio is 252.80. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to SVS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SVS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, KAARYAFSL.BO has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while KAARYAFSL.BO trades at ₹26.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas KAARYAFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KAARYAFSL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to KAARYAFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check KAARYAFSL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, DECOMIC.BO has a market cap of 253.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while DECOMIC.BO trades at ₹57.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas DECOMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DECOMIC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to DECOMIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check DECOMIC.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, UNICK.BO has a market cap of 252.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while UNICK.BO trades at ₹43.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas UNICK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNICK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to UNICK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check UNICK.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RAJSPTR.BO has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RAJSPTR.BO trades at ₹14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RAJSPTR.BO's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJSPTR.BO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to RAJSPTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RAJSPTR.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SMARTFIN.BO has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SMARTFIN.BO trades at ₹7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SMARTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMARTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SMARTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SMARTFIN.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, KACL.BO has a market cap of 235.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while KACL.BO trades at ₹4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas KACL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KACL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to KACL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check KACL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, INLANPR.BO has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while INLANPR.BO trades at ₹43.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas INLANPR.BO's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INLANPR.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to INLANPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check INLANPR.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, PROCLB.BO has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while PROCLB.BO trades at ₹41.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas PROCLB.BO's P/E ratio is -39.05. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PROCLB.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to PROCLB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check PROCLB.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, MPILCORPL.BO has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while MPILCORPL.BO trades at ₹358.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas MPILCORPL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MPILCORPL.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to MPILCORPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check MPILCORPL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ESHAMEDIA.BO has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ESHAMEDIA.BO trades at ₹24.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ESHAMEDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to ESHAMEDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ESHAMEDIA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SBECSYS.BO has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SBECSYS.BO trades at ₹16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SBECSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBECSYS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SBECSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SBECSYS.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, VISVEN.BO has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while VISVEN.BO trades at ₹51.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas VISVEN.BO's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VISVEN.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to VISVEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check VISVEN.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, AMALGAM.BO has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while AMALGAM.BO trades at ₹55.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas AMALGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -78.76. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMALGAM.BO's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to AMALGAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check AMALGAM.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, KIRANPR.BO has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while KIRANPR.BO trades at ₹27.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas KIRANPR.BO's P/E ratio is 155.50. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KIRANPR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to KIRANPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check KIRANPR.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, INNOKAIZ.BO has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while INNOKAIZ.BO trades at ₹13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas INNOKAIZ.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INNOKAIZ.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to INNOKAIZ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check INNOKAIZ.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ASIAN.BO has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ASIAN.BO trades at ₹36.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ASIAN.BO's P/E ratio is 167.73. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASIAN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ASIAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ASIAN.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SHANGAR.BO has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SHANGAR.BO trades at ₹0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SHANGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHANGAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SHANGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SHANGAR.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, HBEL.BO has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while HBEL.BO trades at ₹21.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas HBEL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBEL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to HBEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check HBEL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, BNRUDY.BO has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while BNRUDY.BO trades at ₹39.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas BNRUDY.BO's P/E ratio is -29.20. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNRUDY.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to BNRUDY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check BNRUDY.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ICSL.BO has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ICSL.BO trades at ₹3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ICSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ICSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ICSL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, GLCL.BO has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while GLCL.BO trades at ₹17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas GLCL.BO's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLCL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to GLCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check GLCL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, VBDESAI.BO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while VBDESAI.BO trades at ₹20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas VBDESAI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VBDESAI.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to VBDESAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check VBDESAI.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, MNPLFIN.BO has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while MNPLFIN.BO trades at ₹9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas MNPLFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNPLFIN.BO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to MNPLFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check MNPLFIN.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, GGPL.BO has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while GGPL.BO trades at ₹1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas GGPL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GGPL.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to GGPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check GGPL.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ATHARVENT.BO has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ATHARVENT.BO trades at ₹3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ATHARVENT.BO's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATHARVENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to ATHARVENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ATHARVENT.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SECURCRED.BO has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SECURCRED.BO trades at ₹1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SECURCRED.BO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SECURCRED.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to SECURCRED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SECURCRED.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SECURCRED.NS has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SECURCRED.NS trades at ₹1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SECURCRED.NS's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SECURCRED.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SECURCRED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SECURCRED.NS's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ASHRAM.BO has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ASHRAM.BO trades at ₹4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ASHRAM.BO's P/E ratio is -55.22. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASHRAM.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to ASHRAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ASHRAM.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RICHUNV.BO has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RICHUNV.BO trades at ₹7.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RICHUNV.BO's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RICHUNV.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to RICHUNV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RICHUNV.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, JOINTECAED.BO has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while JOINTECAED.BO trades at ₹5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas JOINTECAED.BO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JOINTECAED.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to JOINTECAED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check JOINTECAED.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, NORTHLINK.BO has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while NORTHLINK.BO trades at ₹15.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas NORTHLINK.BO's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NORTHLINK.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to NORTHLINK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check NORTHLINK.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SHIVA.BO has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SHIVA.BO trades at ₹7.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SHIVA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHIVA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SHIVA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, NAVODAYENT.BO has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while NAVODAYENT.BO trades at ₹5.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas NAVODAYENT.BO's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAVODAYENT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is more volatile compared to NAVODAYENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check NAVODAYENT.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, ENCODE.BO has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while ENCODE.BO trades at ₹13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas ENCODE.BO's P/E ratio is -62.57. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENCODE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to ENCODE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check ENCODE.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, SUUMAYA.BO has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while SUUMAYA.BO trades at ₹1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas SUUMAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUUMAYA.BO's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to SUUMAYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check SUUMAYA.BO's competition here

HGS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HGS.NS stands at 17.8B. In comparison, RAMASIGNS.BO has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HGS.NS is priced at ₹381.00, while RAMASIGNS.BO trades at ₹1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HGS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.13, whereas RAMASIGNS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, HGS.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAMASIGNS.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HGS.NS is less volatile compared to RAMASIGNS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HGS.NS.Check RAMASIGNS.BO's competition here