HF Sinclair Corporation
HF Sinclair Corporation HFC Peers
See (HFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | +4.41% |
| MPC | $177.54 | +1.31% | 54.5B | 24.46 | $7.26 | +2.01% |
| PSX | $127.85 | +1.34% | 52.1B | 28.80 | $4.44 | +3.65% |
| VLO | $147.54 | +1.67% | 46.2B | 50.54 | $2.92 | +2.99% |
| DINO | $45.74 | +2.01% | 8.6B | -67.29 | -$0.68 | +4.41% |
| SUN | $52.57 | -0.28% | 7.2B | 10.62 | $4.95 | +6.71% |
| VVV | $37.04 | -1.33% | 4.7B | 17.99 | $2.06 | N/A |
| UGP | $2.97 | +4.58% | 3.2B | 8.25 | $0.36 | +4.13% |
| REGI | $61.50 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 16.51 | $3.73 | N/A |
| CVI | $28.18 | +1.18% | 2.8B | -14.30 | -$1.97 | +9.83% |
Stock Comparison
HFC vs MPC Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while MPC trades at $177.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs PSX Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while PSX trades at $127.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs VLO Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while VLO trades at $147.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs DINO Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while DINO trades at $45.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is -67.29. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DINO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs SUN Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SUN trades at $52.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs VVV Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while VVV trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VVV's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs UGP Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while UGP trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs REGI Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs CVI Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CVI trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CVI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs PBF Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while PBF trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PBF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PBF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to PBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs CSAN Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CSAN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CSAN trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSAN's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSAN's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CSAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs PARR Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while PARR trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is -29.11. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PARR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs WKC Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while WKC trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is 92.74. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WKC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs INT Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs DK Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while DK trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DK's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DK's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs CAPL Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 824M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CAPL trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs CLNE Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 488.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CLNE trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs SGU Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 408.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SGU trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs AMTX Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while AMTX trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs AE Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs TMDE Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while TMDE trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs BPT Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs VTNR Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs SRLP Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.
HFC vs SHI Comparison
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.