Haoxi Health Technology Limited
Haoxi Health Technology Limited (HAO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HAO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAO | $1.35 | -2.18% | 26.2M | -0.47 | -$2.85 | N/A |
| OMC | $76.48 | -0.75% | 14.8B | 10.94 | $6.99 | +3.66% |
| IPG | $26.05 | -0.99% | 9.6B | 22.08 | $1.18 | +5.07% |
| WPP | $29.27 | +0.21% | 6.3B | 8.79 | $3.33 | +8.54% |
| MGNI | $23.52 | +2.48% | 3.3B | 106.91 | $0.22 | N/A |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| STGW | $5.40 | +3.65% | 1.4B | -539.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| IAS | $8.47 | +1.93% | 1.4B | 29.21 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZD | $32.78 | +1.08% | 1.4B | 18.73 | $1.75 | N/A |
| CRTO | $23.28 | +0.39% | 1.2B | 9.54 | $2.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HAO vs OMC Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while OMC trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check OMC's competition here
HAO vs IPG Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while IPG trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check IPG's competition here
HAO vs WPP Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while WPP trades at $29.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check WPP's competition here
HAO vs MGNI Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MGNI trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 106.91. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MGNI's competition here
HAO vs MDCA Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MDCA's competition here
HAO vs STGW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while STGW trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -539.50. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check STGW's competition here
HAO vs IAS Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while IAS trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check IAS's competition here
HAO vs ZD Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ZD trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ZD's competition here
HAO vs CRTO Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while CRTO trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check CRTO's competition here
HAO vs CMPR Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while CMPR trades at $48.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check CMPR's competition here
HAO vs EEX Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while EEX trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 516.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check EEX's competition here
HAO vs QNST Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 946.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while QNST trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1662.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check QNST's competition here
HAO vs BOMN Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check BOMN's competition here
HAO vs DLX Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 761.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while DLX trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check DLX's competition here
HAO vs CCO Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 558.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while CCO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check CCO's competition here
HAO vs ADV Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 517.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ADV trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ADV's competition here
HAO vs NCMI Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 474.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while NCMI trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -26.47. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check NCMI's competition here
HAO vs CTV Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check CTV's competition here
HAO vs SDM Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while SDM trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 293.50. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check SDM's competition here
HAO vs BOC Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 424.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while BOC trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 458.17. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check BOC's competition here
HAO vs QUOT Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check QUOT's competition here
HAO vs TRMR Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check TRMR's competition here
HAO vs NEXN Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 351.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while NEXN trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check NEXN's competition here
HAO vs ADTH Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ADTH's competition here
HAO vs WIMI Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 203.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while WIMI trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check WIMI's competition here
HAO vs QMMM Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 135.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while QMMM trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check QMMM's competition here
HAO vs CDLX Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while CDLX trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check CDLX's competition here
HAO vs TZOO Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while TZOO trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check TZOO's competition here
HAO vs TSQ Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while TSQ trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check TSQ's competition here
HAO vs ATY Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ATY's competition here
HAO vs MCHX Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MCHX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MCHX's competition here
HAO vs ICLK Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ICLK's competition here
HAO vs INUV Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while INUV trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check INUV's competition here
HAO vs STCN Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check STCN's competition here
HAO vs VSME Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 62.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while VSME trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check VSME's competition here
HAO vs XNET Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while XNET trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -99.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XNET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check XNET's competition here
HAO vs ABLV Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ABLV trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ABLV's competition here
HAO vs FLNT Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while FLNT trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check FLNT's competition here
HAO vs ACCS Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ACCS trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ACCS's competition here
HAO vs ADTHW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ADTHW's competition here
HAO vs MCTR Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MCTR trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 134.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MCTR's competition here
HAO vs GSMG Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check GSMG's competition here
HAO vs MOXC Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MOXC's competition here
HAO vs MOBQ Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MOBQ trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MOBQ's competition here
HAO vs SWAG Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while SWAG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check SWAG's competition here
HAO vs STFS Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while STFS trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 185.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check STFS's competition here
HAO vs HHS Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while HHS trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check HHS's competition here
HAO vs STRN Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check STRN's competition here
HAO vs CHR Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while CHR trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check CHR's competition here
HAO vs EDHL Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while EDHL trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 75.04. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check EDHL's competition here
HAO vs ISIG Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ISIG's competition here
HAO vs TNMG Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while TNMG trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check TNMG's competition here
HAO vs DRCT Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while DRCT trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check DRCT's competition here
HAO vs LDWY Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while LDWY trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check LDWY's competition here
HAO vs DMS Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check DMS's competition here
HAO vs DRCTW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check DRCTW's competition here
HAO vs ADVWW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ADVWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ADVWW's competition here
HAO vs BAOS Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while BAOS trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check BAOS's competition here
HAO vs CNET Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while CNET trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check CNET's competition here
HAO vs MGOL Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MGOL's competition here
HAO vs STRNW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check STRNW's competition here
HAO vs TRKAW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check TRKAW's competition here
HAO vs ABLVW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 497.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ABLVW's competition here
HAO vs SRAX Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 340K. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while SRAX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check SRAX's competition here
HAO vs SWAGW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 228.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while SWAGW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check SWAGW's competition here
HAO vs MOBQW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check MOBQW's competition here
HAO vs GSMGW Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check GSMGW's competition here
HAO vs DMS-WT Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check DMS-WT's competition here
HAO vs ZDVSV Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check ZDVSV's competition here
HAO vs TRKA Comparison July 2025
HAO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HAO stands at 26.2M. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HAO is priced at $1.35, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HAO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.47, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HAO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HAO is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HAO.Check TRKA's competition here