Enapter AG

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, SIE.DE has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while SIE.DE trades at €219.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas SIE.DE's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SIE.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to SIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check SIE.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, SND.DE has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while SND.DE trades at €214.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas SND.DE's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SND.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to SND.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check SND.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, ENR.DE has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while ENR.DE trades at €98.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas ENR.DE's P/E ratio is 89.17. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ENR.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to ENR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check ENR.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, XY6.DE has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while XY6.DE trades at €123.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas XY6.DE's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to XY6.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to XY6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check XY6.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, KC4.DE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while KC4.DE trades at €52.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas KC4.DE's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KC4.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to KC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check KC4.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, VWSB.DE has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while VWSB.DE trades at €15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas VWSB.DE's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to VWSB.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to VWSB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check VWSB.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, G1A.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while G1A.DE trades at €63.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas G1A.DE's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to G1A.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to G1A.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check G1A.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, RAA.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while RAA.DE trades at €635.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas RAA.DE's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RAA.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to RAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check RAA.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, NDX1.DE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while NDX1.DE trades at €22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas NDX1.DE's P/E ratio is 173.69. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NDX1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to NDX1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check NDX1.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, KRN.DE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while KRN.DE trades at €128.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas KRN.DE's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KRN.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to KRN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check KRN.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, JUN3.DE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while JUN3.DE trades at €33.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas JUN3.DE's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to JUN3.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to JUN3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check JUN3.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, KSB3.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while KSB3.DE trades at €918.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas KSB3.DE's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KSB3.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to KSB3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check KSB3.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, KSB.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while KSB.DE trades at €955.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas KSB.DE's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KSB.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to KSB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check KSB.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, DUE.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while DUE.DE trades at €22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas DUE.DE's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DUE.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to DUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check DUE.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, PFV.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while PFV.DE trades at €155.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas PFV.DE's P/E ratio is 48.83. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PFV.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to PFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check PFV.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, NCH2.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while NCH2.DE trades at €9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas NCH2.DE's P/E ratio is 49.18. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NCH2.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to NCH2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check NCH2.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, DEZ.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while DEZ.DE trades at €7.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas DEZ.DE's P/E ratio is 70.38. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DEZ.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to DEZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check DEZ.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, JST.DE has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while JST.DE trades at €49.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas JST.DE's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to JST.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to JST.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check JST.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, HDD.DE has a market cap of 672.6M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while HDD.DE trades at €2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas HDD.DE's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HDD.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to HDD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check HDD.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, 2GB.DE has a market cap of 654.8M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while 2GB.DE trades at €36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas 2GB.DE's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to 2GB.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to 2GB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check 2GB.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, AM3D.DE has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while AM3D.DE trades at €18.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas AM3D.DE's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AM3D.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to AM3D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check AM3D.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, STM.DE has a market cap of 587.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while STM.DE trades at €23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas STM.DE's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to STM.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to STM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check STM.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, WSU.DE has a market cap of 535.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while WSU.DE trades at €40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas WSU.DE's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to WSU.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to WSU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check WSU.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, IJ8.DE has a market cap of 475.7M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while IJ8.DE trades at €0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas IJ8.DE's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IJ8.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to IJ8.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check IJ8.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, PO0.F has a market cap of 470.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while PO0.F trades at €1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas PO0.F's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PO0.F's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to PO0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check PO0.F's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, IJ8.F has a market cap of 463.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while IJ8.F trades at €0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas IJ8.F's P/E ratio is -9.38. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IJ8.F's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to IJ8.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check IJ8.F's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, TPE.DE has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while TPE.DE trades at €20.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas TPE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TPE.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to TPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check TPE.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, HG1.F has a market cap of 439.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while HG1.F trades at €27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas HG1.F's P/E ratio is 35.44. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to HG1.F's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to HG1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check HG1.F's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, D7G.F has a market cap of 377.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while D7G.F trades at €0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas D7G.F's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to D7G.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to D7G.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check D7G.F's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, VQT.DE has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while VQT.DE trades at €25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas VQT.DE's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to VQT.DE's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to VQT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check VQT.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, S9I.DE has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while S9I.DE trades at €53.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas S9I.DE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to S9I.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. H2O.F has daily volatility of 4.31 and S9I.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check S9I.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, F3C.DE has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while F3C.DE trades at €15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas F3C.DE's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to F3C.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to F3C.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check F3C.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, SEW.DE has a market cap of 271.6M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while SEW.DE trades at €13.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas SEW.DE's P/E ratio is -440.00. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to SEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check SEW.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, MXHN.DE has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while MXHN.DE trades at €5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas MXHN.DE's P/E ratio is 83.71. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MXHN.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to MXHN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check MXHN.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, SKB.DE has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while SKB.DE trades at €14.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas SKB.DE's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SKB.DE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to SKB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check SKB.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, LPK.DE has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while LPK.DE trades at €8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas LPK.DE's P/E ratio is -53.93. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LPK.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to LPK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check LPK.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, AVES.DE has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while AVES.DE trades at €15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas AVES.DE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AVES.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to AVES.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check AVES.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, GSC1.DE has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while GSC1.DE trades at €17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas GSC1.DE's P/E ratio is 38.22. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GSC1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to GSC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check GSC1.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, AAG.DE has a market cap of 170.2M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while AAG.DE trades at €12.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas AAG.DE's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AAG.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to AAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check AAG.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, TTR1.DE has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while TTR1.DE trades at €23.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas TTR1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TTR1.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to TTR1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check TTR1.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, DIS.DE has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while DIS.DE trades at €6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas DIS.DE's P/E ratio is 630.00. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DIS.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to DIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check DIS.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, SW1.DE has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while SW1.DE trades at €19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas SW1.DE's P/E ratio is -197.92. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SW1.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to SW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check SW1.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, RSL2.DE has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while RSL2.DE trades at €18.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas RSL2.DE's P/E ratio is 98.33. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RSL2.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to RSL2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check RSL2.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, H2O.DE has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while H2O.DE trades at €2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas H2O.DE's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to H2O.DE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to H2O.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check H2O.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, DAR.DE has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while DAR.DE trades at €7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas DAR.DE's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DAR.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to DAR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check DAR.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, SNG.DE has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while SNG.DE trades at €1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas SNG.DE's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SNG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is less volatile compared to SNG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check SNG.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, ACO1.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while ACO1.F trades at €36.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas ACO1.F's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ACO1.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to ACO1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check ACO1.F's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, GTQ1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while GTQ1.DE trades at €18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas GTQ1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GTQ1.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to GTQ1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check GTQ1.DE's competition here

H2O.F plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, H2O.F stands at 74.5M. In comparison, KU2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, H2O.F is priced at €2.50, while KU2.DE trades at €84.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

H2O.F currently has a P/E ratio of -3.25, whereas KU2.DE's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, H2O.F's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KU2.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, H2O.F is more volatile compared to KU2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for H2O.F.Check KU2.DE's competition here