W.W. Grainger, Inc.
W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWW | $1,073.94 | -0.76% | 51.1B | 30.34 | $35.42 | +0.84% |
| FAST | $45.46 | +0.46% | 52.2B | 41.71 | $1.09 | +1.98% |
| FERG | $222.05 | +1.06% | 43.2B | 21.51 | $10.33 | +1.55% |
| WSO | $368.39 | +1.26% | 15B | 30.11 | $12.23 | +3.26% |
| QXO | $20.18 | +3.49% | 14.3B | -32.04 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| WSO-B | $367.54 | +0.00% | 13.9B | 30.05 | $12.23 | +3.26% |
| WCC | $256.11 | -0.42% | 12.5B | 19.90 | $12.87 | +0.73% |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.73% |
| AIT | $255.65 | -1.63% | 9.6B | 24.32 | $10.51 | +0.74% |
| CNM | $48.06 | +0.89% | 9.1B | 21.18 | $2.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GWW vs FAST Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while FAST trades at $45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FAST's competition here
GWW vs FERG Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while FERG trades at $222.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FERG's competition here
GWW vs WSO Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while WSO trades at $368.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO's competition here
GWW vs QXO Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while QXO trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -32.04. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check QXO's competition here
GWW vs WSO-B Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while WSO-B trades at $367.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO-B's competition here
GWW vs WCC Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while WCC trades at $256.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC's competition here
GWW vs WCC-PA Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC-PA's competition here
GWW vs AIT Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while AIT trades at $255.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check AIT's competition here
GWW vs CNM Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while CNM trades at $48.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check CNM's competition here
GWW vs POOL Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while POOL trades at $206.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check POOL's competition here
GWW vs SITE Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while SITE trades at $129.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SITE's competition here
GWW vs MSM Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while MSM trades at $91.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check MSM's competition here
GWW vs DXPE Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while DXPE trades at $130.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DXPE's competition here
GWW vs SYX Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SYX's competition here
GWW vs GIC Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while GIC trades at $30.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check GIC's competition here
GWW vs DSGR Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 892.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while DSGR trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is -83.96. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DSGR's competition here
GWW vs LAWS Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check LAWS's competition here
GWW vs TRNS Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 690.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while TRNS trades at $73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TRNS's competition here
GWW vs TITN Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while TITN trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TITN's competition here
GWW vs EVI Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 248.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while EVI trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check EVI's competition here
GWW vs BRIA Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while BRIA trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check BRIA's competition here
GWW vs HTLM Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while HTLM trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HTLM's competition here
GWW vs RECT Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while RECT trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check RECT's competition here
GWW vs PASW Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while PASW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PASW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check PASW's competition here
GWW vs HWCC Comparison March 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 51.1B. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,073.94, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 30.34, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HWCC's competition here