Grom Social Enterprises, Inc.
Grom Social Enterprises, Inc. GROMW Peers
See (GROMW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GROMW | $0.00 | -76.19% | 2.6K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GOOG | $177.39 | -0.49% | 2.1T | 19.82 | $8.95 | +0.46% |
| GOOGL | $176.23 | -1.29% | 2.1T | 19.67 | $8.96 | +0.46% |
| META | $738.09 | +0.61% | 1.9T | 28.84 | $25.59 | +0.28% |
| SPOT | $767.34 | -0.68% | 154.1B | 119.07 | $6.44 | N/A |
| DASH | $246.51 | +1.73% | 104.5B | 312.04 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| TME | $19.49 | +2.04% | 30.4B | 22.95 | $0.85 | +0.93% |
| BIDU | $85.76 | -0.43% | 29.7B | 8.48 | $10.11 | N/A |
| RDDT | $150.57 | +5.29% | 27.7B | 30.09 | $5.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GROMW vs GOOG Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while GOOG trades at $177.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs GOOGL Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while GOOGL trades at $176.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs META Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while META trades at $738.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SPOT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SPOT trades at $767.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 119.07. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs DASH Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 104.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while DASH trades at $246.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 312.04. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TWTR Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TME Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TME trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs BIDU Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while BIDU trades at $85.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs RDDT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while RDDT trades at $150.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs PINS Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while PINS trades at $35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TWLO Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TWLO trades at $124.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -518.00. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ZG Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ZG trades at $68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -195.69. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs Z Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while Z trades at $70.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -200.14. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs YNDX Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SNAP Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SNAP trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs NBIS Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while NBIS trades at $55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -33.53. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs MTCH Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while MTCH trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs DJT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while DJT trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs DJTWW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while DJTWW trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs IACVV Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs CARG Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while CARG trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 90.46. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs IAC Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while IAC trades at $37.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs JOYY Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while JOYY trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.53. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs GENI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while GENI trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -54.68. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs WB Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while WB trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs YELP Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while YELP trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs YY Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs NN Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while NN trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs DOYU Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while DOYU trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TBLAW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TBLAW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ANGIV Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs GRPN Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while GRPN trades at $33.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -33.45. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs MOMO Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while MOMO trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TBLA Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TBLA trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs FVRR Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while FVRR trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 61.08. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs EVER Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 874.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while EVER trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs JFIN Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 855M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while JFIN trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs OPRA Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 845.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while OPRA trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs NNAVW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 840.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while NNAVW trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ATHM Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 778.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ATHM trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs MAX Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 740.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while MAX trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ANGI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 732.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ANGI trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs GETY Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 684.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while GETY trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SSTK Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 668.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SSTK trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SMWB Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 650.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SMWB trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -35.70. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs KIND Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 631.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while KIND trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TTGT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 555.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TTGT trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs THRY Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while THRY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs PERI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 457.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while PERI trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -56.39. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ZH Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ZH trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -132.83. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs AREN Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 294M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while AREN trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs UPXI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while UPXI trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TRVG Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TRVG trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs OB Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while OB trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SEAT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SEAT trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TRUE Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TRUE trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ILLR Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ILLR trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ILLRW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs BZFD Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while BZFD trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs CCG Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while CCG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs PODC Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while PODC trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ASST Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ASST trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs BODY Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ZDGE Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ZDGE trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -30.85. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs GIFT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while GIFT trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs IZEA Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while IZEA trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs EGLX Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs MNY Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while MNY trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs NAMI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while NAMI trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs BODI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while BODI trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SCOR Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SCOR trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SOGP Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SOGP trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LTRPA Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LTRPB Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SEATW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SEATW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LYL Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs HRYU Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LCFYW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LCFYW trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -141.56. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LIZI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs FAZE Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LKCO Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LKCO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs KRKR Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while KRKR trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LCFY Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LCFY trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs QTT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs LOV Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ONFO Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ONFO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs CRTD Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while CRTD trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SLE Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SLE trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ROI Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs CMCM Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while CMCM trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs TC Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while TC trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs MNYWW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while MNYWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs STBX Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs FAZEW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs ONFOW Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 665.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while ONFOW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs SLGG Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs FENG Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 244.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while FENG trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs GROM Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.
GROMW vs BLCT Comparison
GROMW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GROMW stands at 2.6K. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GROMW is priced at $0.00, while BLCT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GROMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, GROMW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GROMW is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GROMW.