Goodluck India Limited
Goodluck India Limited (GOODLUCK.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GOODLUCK.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOODLUCK.NS | ₹1,216.30 | +1.11% | 40.3B | 23.70 | ₹51.13 | +0.58% |
| JSWSTEEL.NS | ₹1,228.40 | -0.60% | 3T | 40.81 | ₹30.40 | +0.23% |
| JSWSTEEL.BO | ₹1,228.15 | -0.66% | 3T | 40.79 | ₹30.41 | +0.23% |
| TATASTEEL.NS | ₹205.41 | -1.42% | 2.6T | 0.33 | ₹632.04 | +1.73% |
| TATASTEEL.BO | ₹205.45 | -1.34% | 2.6T | 38.17 | ₹5.45 | +1.73% |
| JINDALSTEL.BO | ₹1,208.30 | -0.71% | 1.2T | 62.57 | ₹19.45 | +0.16% |
| JINDALSTEL.NS | ₹1,211.10 | -0.49% | 1.2T | 62.39 | ₹19.50 | +0.16% |
| NMDC.BO | ₹79.20 | -1.06% | 694.5B | 10.06 | ₹7.85 | +4.37% |
| NMDC.NS | ₹79.22 | -1.14% | 693.8B | 10.05 | ₹7.85 | +4.37% |
| JSL.NS | ₹745.95 | -2.02% | 655B | 22.32 | ₹35.63 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
GOODLUCK.NS vs JSWSTEEL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JSWSTEEL.NS trades at ₹1,228.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JSWSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWSTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JSWSTEEL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JSWSTEEL.BO has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JSWSTEEL.BO trades at ₹1,228.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JSWSTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.79. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWSTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSWSTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSWSTEEL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs TATASTEEL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while TATASTEEL.NS trades at ₹205.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas TATASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATASTEEL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs TATASTEEL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TATASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while TATASTEEL.BO trades at ₹205.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas TATASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATASTEEL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JINDALSTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JINDALSTEL.BO trades at ₹1,208.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JINDALSTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 62.57. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSTEL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JINDALSTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JINDALSTEL.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JINDALSTEL.NS trades at ₹1,211.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JINDALSTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 62.39. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSTEL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSTEL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs NMDC.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NMDC.BO has a market cap of 694.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while NMDC.BO trades at ₹79.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas NMDC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMDC.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NMDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NMDC.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs NMDC.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NMDC.NS has a market cap of 693.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while NMDC.NS trades at ₹79.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas NMDC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMDC.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NMDC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NMDC.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JSL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JSL.NS has a market cap of 655B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JSL.NS trades at ₹745.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JSL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JSL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JSL.BO has a market cap of 655B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JSL.BO trades at ₹746.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JSL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SAIL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SAIL.BO has a market cap of 647.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SAIL.BO trades at ₹155.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SAIL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SAIL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SAIL.NS has a market cap of 647.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SAIL.NS trades at ₹155.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SAIL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs APLAPOLLO.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.BO has a market cap of 608.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while APLAPOLLO.BO trades at ₹2,199.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas APLAPOLLO.BO's P/E ratio is 53.28. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLAPOLLO.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs APLAPOLLO.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, APLAPOLLO.NS has a market cap of 608.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while APLAPOLLO.NS trades at ₹2,203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas APLAPOLLO.NS's P/E ratio is 53.19. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLAPOLLO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to APLAPOLLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check APLAPOLLO.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs LLOYDSME.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.BO has a market cap of 602.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while LLOYDSME.BO trades at ₹1,126.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas LLOYDSME.BO's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSME.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check LLOYDSME.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs LLOYDSME.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, LLOYDSME.NS has a market cap of 602.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while LLOYDSME.NS trades at ₹1,127.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas LLOYDSME.NS's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSME.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check LLOYDSME.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SHYAMMETL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.NS has a market cap of 235B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SHYAMMETL.NS trades at ₹857.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SHYAMMETL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHYAMMETL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SHYAMMETL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SHYAMMETL.BO has a market cap of 234.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SHYAMMETL.BO trades at ₹859.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SHYAMMETL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHYAMMETL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMMETL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SHYAMMETL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs WELCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, WELCORP.BO has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while WELCORP.BO trades at ₹783.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas WELCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELCORP.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check WELCORP.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs WELCORP.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, WELCORP.NS has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while WELCORP.NS trades at ₹783.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas WELCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELCORP.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to WELCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check WELCORP.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs KIOCL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, KIOCL.NS has a market cap of 203.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while KIOCL.NS trades at ₹344.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas KIOCL.NS's P/E ratio is -272.36. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIOCL.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to KIOCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KIOCL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs KIOCL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, KIOCL.BO has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while KIOCL.BO trades at ₹344.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas KIOCL.BO's P/E ratio is -272.24. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIOCL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to KIOCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KIOCL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SARDAEN.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SARDAEN.BO has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SARDAEN.BO trades at ₹510.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SARDAEN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARDAEN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SARDAEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SARDAEN.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SARDAEN.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SARDAEN.NS has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SARDAEN.NS trades at ₹510.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SARDAEN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SARDAEN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SARDAEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SARDAEN.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs RATNAMANI.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.BO has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while RATNAMANI.BO trades at ₹2,475.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas RATNAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RATNAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to RATNAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RATNAMANI.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs RATNAMANI.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RATNAMANI.NS has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while RATNAMANI.NS trades at ₹2,476.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas RATNAMANI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RATNAMANI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to RATNAMANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RATNAMANI.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs GPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GPIL.NS has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while GPIL.NS trades at ₹261.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas GPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to GPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GPIL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs GPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GPIL.BO has a market cap of 174.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while GPIL.BO trades at ₹261.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas GPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to GPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GPIL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs GALLANTT.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GALLANTT.BO has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while GALLANTT.BO trades at ₹574.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas GALLANTT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GALLANTT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to GALLANTT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GALLANTT.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs GALLANTT.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GALLANTT.NS has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while GALLANTT.NS trades at ₹574.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas GALLANTT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GALLANTT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to GALLANTT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GALLANTT.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JSLHISAR.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JSLHISAR.NS has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JSLHISAR.NS trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JSLHISAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSLHISAR.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to JSLHISAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSLHISAR.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs USHAMART.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, USHAMART.NS has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while USHAMART.NS trades at ₹405.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas USHAMART.NS's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USHAMART.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to USHAMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check USHAMART.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs USHAMART.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, USHAMART.BO has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while USHAMART.BO trades at ₹405.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas USHAMART.BO's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USHAMART.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to USHAMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check USHAMART.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JINDALSAW.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.BO has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JINDALSAW.BO trades at ₹177.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JINDALSAW.BO's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSAW.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSAW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSAW.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JINDALSAW.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JINDALSAW.NS has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JINDALSAW.NS trades at ₹177.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JINDALSAW.NS's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALSAW.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALSAW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JINDALSAW.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs NSLNISP.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NSLNISP.BO has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while NSLNISP.BO trades at ₹38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas NSLNISP.BO's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSLNISP.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NSLNISP.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs NSLNISP.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NSLNISP.NS has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while NSLNISP.NS trades at ₹38.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas NSLNISP.NS's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSLNISP.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to NSLNISP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check NSLNISP.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs LLOYDSENT.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, LLOYDSENT.NS has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while LLOYDSENT.NS trades at ₹55.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas LLOYDSENT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check LLOYDSENT.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JAYNECOIND.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.BO has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JAYNECOIND.BO trades at ₹79.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JAYNECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAYNECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JAYNECOIND.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JAYNECOIND.NS has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JAYNECOIND.NS trades at ₹80.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JAYNECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAYNECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to JAYNECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAYNECOIND.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MAHSEAMLES.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.NS has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MAHSEAMLES.NS trades at ₹529.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MAHSEAMLES.NS's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MAHSEAMLES.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MAHSEAMLES.BO has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MAHSEAMLES.BO trades at ₹530.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MAHSEAMLES.BO's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSEAMLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHSEAMLES.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs IMFA.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, IMFA.BO has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while IMFA.BO trades at ₹1,317.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas IMFA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMFA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to IMFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check IMFA.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs IMFA.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, IMFA.NS has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while IMFA.NS trades at ₹1,317.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas IMFA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMFA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to IMFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check IMFA.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MIDHANI.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MIDHANI.NS has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MIDHANI.NS trades at ₹353.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MIDHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 58.52. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIDHANI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MIDHANI.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MIDHANI.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MIDHANI.BO has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MIDHANI.BO trades at ₹353.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MIDHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 58.62. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIDHANI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MIDHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MIDHANI.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JAIBALAJI.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.BO has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JAIBALAJI.BO trades at ₹64.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JAIBALAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAIBALAJI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JAIBALAJI.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JAIBALAJI.NS has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JAIBALAJI.NS trades at ₹65.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JAIBALAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAIBALAJI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to JAIBALAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JAIBALAJI.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SURYAROSNI.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SURYAROSNI.NS trades at ₹223.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SURYAROSNI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SURYAROSNI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SURYAROSNI.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SURYAROSNI.BO has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SURYAROSNI.BO trades at ₹223.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SURYAROSNI.BO's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SURYAROSNI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SURYAROSNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SURYAROSNI.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs TINPLATE.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TINPLATE.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while TINPLATE.NS trades at ₹430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas TINPLATE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TINPLATE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TINPLATE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TINPLATE.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs TINPLATE.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TINPLATE.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while TINPLATE.BO trades at ₹430.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas TINPLATE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TINPLATE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TINPLATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TINPLATE.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SUNFLAG.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.NS has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SUNFLAG.NS trades at ₹247.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SUNFLAG.NS's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNFLAG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SUNFLAG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SUNFLAG.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SUNFLAG.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SUNFLAG.BO has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SUNFLAG.BO trades at ₹247.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SUNFLAG.BO's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNFLAG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SUNFLAG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SUNFLAG.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs ELECTCAST.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.BO has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while ELECTCAST.BO trades at ₹71.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas ELECTCAST.BO's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELECTCAST.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTCAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ELECTCAST.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs ELECTCAST.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ELECTCAST.NS has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while ELECTCAST.NS trades at ₹71.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas ELECTCAST.NS's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELECTCAST.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to ELECTCAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ELECTCAST.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs BANSALWIRE.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BANSALWIRE.NS has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while BANSALWIRE.NS trades at ₹271.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas BANSALWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BANSALWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to BANSALWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check BANSALWIRE.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs GOODLUCK.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GOODLUCK.BO has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while GOODLUCK.BO trades at ₹1,214.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas GOODLUCK.BO's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOODLUCK.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to GOODLUCK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check GOODLUCK.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs TATASTLLP.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TATASTLLP.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while TATASTLLP.NS trades at ₹829.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas TATASTLLP.NS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATASTLLP.NS's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATASTLLP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATASTLLP.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs ISMTLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while ISMTLTD.NS trades at ₹121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas ISMTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISMTLTD.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ISMTLTD.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs ISMTLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ISMTLTD.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while ISMTLTD.BO trades at ₹119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas ISMTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISMTLTD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to ISMTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check ISMTLTD.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs TATAMETALI.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while TATAMETALI.BO trades at ₹1,111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas TATAMETALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAMETALI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATAMETALI.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs TATAMETALI.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TATAMETALI.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while TATAMETALI.NS trades at ₹1,110.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas TATAMETALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAMETALI.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to TATAMETALI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check TATAMETALI.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MANINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MANINDS.BO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MANINDS.BO trades at ₹427.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MANINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANINDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MANINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MANINDS.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MANINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MANINDS.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MANINDS.NS trades at ₹426.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MANINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANINDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MANINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MANINDS.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs KSL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, KSL.BO has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while KSL.BO trades at ₹746.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas KSL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to KSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KSL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs KSL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, KSL.NS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while KSL.NS trades at ₹747.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas KSL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to KSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check KSL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SANDUMA.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SANDUMA.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SANDUMA.BO trades at ₹203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SANDUMA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANDUMA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SANDUMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SANDUMA.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SANDUMA.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SANDUMA.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SANDUMA.NS trades at ₹203.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SANDUMA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANDUMA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SANDUMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SANDUMA.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SAMBHV.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SAMBHV.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SAMBHV.NS trades at ₹102.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SAMBHV.NS's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAMBHV.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to SAMBHV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SAMBHV.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MAITHANALL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MAITHANALL.BO trades at ₹1,027.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MAITHANALL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAITHANALL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAITHANALL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MAITHANALL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MAITHANALL.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MAITHANALL.NS trades at ₹1,023.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MAITHANALL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAITHANALL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MAITHANALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAITHANALL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JTLIND.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JTLIND.BO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JTLIND.BO trades at ₹64.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JTLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTLIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JTLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JTLIND.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JTLIND.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JTLIND.NS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JTLIND.NS trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JTLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTLIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JTLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JTLIND.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs PRAKASH.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PRAKASH.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while PRAKASH.NS trades at ₹137.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas PRAKASH.NS's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRAKASH.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to PRAKASH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check PRAKASH.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs PRAKASH.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PRAKASH.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while PRAKASH.BO trades at ₹137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas PRAKASH.BO's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRAKASH.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to PRAKASH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check PRAKASH.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs WELSPLSOL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, WELSPLSOL.BO has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while WELSPLSOL.BO trades at ₹37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas WELSPLSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 106.23. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WELSPLSOL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPLSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check WELSPLSOL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs VSSL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, VSSL.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while VSSL.NS trades at ₹252.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas VSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to VSSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VSSL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs VSSL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, VSSL.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while VSSL.BO trades at ₹253.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas VSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VSSL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to VSSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VSSL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs STEELCAS.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, STEELCAS.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while STEELCAS.NS trades at ₹232.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas STEELCAS.NS's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STEELCAS.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to STEELCAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check STEELCAS.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹4,862.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is 289.59. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs VENUSPIPES.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while VENUSPIPES.BO trades at ₹1,089.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas VENUSPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VENUSPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs VENUSPIPES.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, VENUSPIPES.NS has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while VENUSPIPES.NS trades at ₹1,089.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas VENUSPIPES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VENUSPIPES.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to VENUSPIPES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check VENUSPIPES.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs RAJRATAN.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while RAJRATAN.BO trades at ₹439.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas RAJRATAN.BO's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAJRATAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RAJRATAN.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs RAJRATAN.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RAJRATAN.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while RAJRATAN.NS trades at ₹438.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas RAJRATAN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAJRATAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRATAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RAJRATAN.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs RHETAN.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RHETAN.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while RHETAN.BO trades at ₹25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas RHETAN.BO's P/E ratio is 523.20. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RHETAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RHETAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RHETAN.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs RHETAN.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RHETAN.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while RHETAN.NS trades at ₹25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas RHETAN.NS's P/E ratio is 522.40. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RHETAN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to RHETAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check RHETAN.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MUKANDLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MUKANDLTD.NS trades at ₹127.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MUKANDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUKANDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MUKANDLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MUKANDLTD.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MUKANDLTD.BO trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MUKANDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MUKANDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MUKANDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MUKANDLTD.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs JSWISPL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, JSWISPL.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while JSWISPL.NS trades at ₹38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas JSWISPL.NS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWISPL.NS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to JSWISPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check JSWISPL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MSPL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MSPL.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MSPL.BO trades at ₹32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MSPL.BO's P/E ratio is -20.38. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSPL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MSPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MSPL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MSPL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MSPL.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MSPL.NS trades at ₹32.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MSPL.NS's P/E ratio is -18.90. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSPL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to MSPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MSPL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs HITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HITECH.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while HITECH.BO trades at ₹85.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas HITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HITECH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to HITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check HITECH.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs HITECH.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HITECH.NS has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while HITECH.NS trades at ₹85.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas HITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HITECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to HITECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check HITECH.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SALASAR.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SALASAR.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SALASAR.BO trades at ₹8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SALASAR.BO's P/E ratio is 80.60. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALASAR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SALASAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SALASAR.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs SALASAR.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SALASAR.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while SALASAR.NS trades at ₹8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas SALASAR.NS's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SALASAR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to SALASAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check SALASAR.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MAHASTEEL.BO Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MAHASTEEL.BO trades at ₹735.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MAHASTEEL.BO's P/E ratio is 115.04. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHASTEEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHASTEEL.BO's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs MAHASTEEL.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MAHASTEEL.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while MAHASTEEL.NS trades at ₹730.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas MAHASTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 113.51. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHASTEEL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is more volatile compared to MAHASTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check MAHASTEEL.NS's competition here
GOODLUCK.NS vs BHARATWIRE.NS Comparison February 2026
GOODLUCK.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOODLUCK.NS stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BHARATWIRE.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOODLUCK.NS is priced at ₹1,216.30, while BHARATWIRE.NS trades at ₹185.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOODLUCK.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.70, whereas BHARATWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, GOODLUCK.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOODLUCK.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOODLUCK.NS.Check BHARATWIRE.NS's competition here