Glencore plc
Glencore plc GLNCY Peers
See (GLNCY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLNCY | $7.47 | +2.33% | 44.9B | -28.73 | -$0.26 | +2.88% |
| CHZQ | $0.01 | +4900.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.05 | +2.24% | 127.1B | 11.18 | $2.24 | +4.92% |
| RTPPF | $62.00 | -0.79% | 105.8B | 8.77 | $7.07 | +6.54% |
| RTNTF | $74.20 | -3.01% | 103.7B | 10.50 | $7.07 | +3.17% |
| GLCNF | $3.76 | +2.17% | 45.2B | -28.92 | -$0.13 | +3.06% |
| GMBXF | $5.65 | +2.17% | 44B | 12.28 | $0.46 | +4.49% |
| AAUKF | $30.00 | -0.92% | 36.4B | -11.86 | -$2.53 | +2.12% |
| NGLOY | $14.85 | +1.50% | 36B | -11.69 | -$1.27 | +2.15% |
| FSUMF | $10.05 | -4.29% | 30.9B | 7.98 | $1.26 | +8.69% |
Stock Comparison
GLNCY vs CHZQ Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while CHZQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs BHPLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while BHPLF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs RTPPF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while RTPPF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs RTNTF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while RTNTF trades at $74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs GLCNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while GLCNF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.92. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs GMBXF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while GMBXF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs AAUKF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while AAUKF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs NGLOY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while NGLOY trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs FSUMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while FSUMF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs FSUGY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while FSUGY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs CNSUF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while CNSUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CNSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs CMCLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while CMCLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs TCKRF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while TCKRF trades at $32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 648.20. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs JXMNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs IVPAF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while IVPAF trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs BOLIF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs BDNNY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while BDNNY trades at $64.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs SHTLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while SHTLF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -40.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs IPOAF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while IPOAF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ABML Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs STMNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs SMMYY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while SMMYY trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 51.45. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PUTKF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PUTKY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PUTKY trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs LYSCF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while LYSCF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 128.75. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs LYSDY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while LYSDY trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 125.25. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs NILSY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PAEKY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MLYF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs FLMMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MALRY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MALRY trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PILBF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PILBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs AFBOF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while AFBOF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PWCRF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PWCRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs NGXXF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while NGXXF trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -39.75. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PTNDY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs DWMNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while DWMNF trades at $36.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MIMTF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MIMTF trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs IPGDF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PTNDF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs AZZVF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs IIDDY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while IIDDY trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MALRF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs SOUHY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while SOUHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.42. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ERMAF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ERMAF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 100.53. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ERMAY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ERMAY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs NCKAF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while NCKAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs CXXMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while CXXMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs NICMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while NICMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs DETRF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while DETRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ILKAF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ILKAF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ILKAY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ILKAY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ADTLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ADTLF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ADMLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ADMLF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs AZRMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs LINRF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while LINRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MFRVF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs STTSY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while STTSY trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs BQSSF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while BQSSF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs TTNNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while TTNNF trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs FMCXF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 923.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while FMCXF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -54.75. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs OSTTF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while OSTTF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs AFMJF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 899.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ATUSF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 895.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ATUSF trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs GERFF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs TAOFF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 718.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while TAOFF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs AMVMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs VULNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while VULNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ALMTF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 546.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ALMTF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs AUSDF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 520.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while AUSDF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs BIRNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while BIRNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs PKREF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 510.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MJDLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MJDLF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MCRZF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs BSSMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 458.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while BSSMF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs FGOVF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while FGOVF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -74.74. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs VTMLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 392.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while VTMLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MCHHF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MCHHF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs NQMIY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs WYCC Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while WYCC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs CTJHY Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while CTJHY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs REEMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 351.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while REEMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -22.68. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ERLFF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 338.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.60. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs KMRPF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs BELMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while BELMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MLYCF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 318.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MLYCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MLYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MNXMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MNXMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -54.69. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs SLGGF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 296.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs CGMLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while CGMLF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs SVMLF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while SVMLF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs LTSRF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs MLXEF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while MLXEF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs EGMMF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, EGMMF has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while EGMMF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas EGMMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EGMMF's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to EGMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs FWEDF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while FWEDF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ARAFF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs ERDCF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 266.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while ERDCF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs LRSRF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs JMXXF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while JMXXF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.
GLNCY vs STQNF Comparison
GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 44.9B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $7.47, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -28.73, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.