Glencore plc

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while BHPLF trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 108B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while RTNTF trades at $76.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while RTPPF trades at $61.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while GLCNF trades at $4.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while GMBXF trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while FSUGY trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while FSUMF trades at $11.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while NGLOY trades at $15.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while AAUKF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while CMCLF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while IVPAF trades at $8.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while IPOAF trades at $25.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while BDNNY trades at $66.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while SHTLF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.60. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while STMNF trades at $24.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 58.40. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ABML trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while SMMYY trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 60.30. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while LYSDY trades at $6.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 167.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while LYSCF trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 164.85. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PUTKY trades at $27.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while NILSY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PILBF trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MALRY trades at $20.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MALRF trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while NGXXF trades at $13.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -48.10. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while IPGDF trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while IIDDY trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while NICMF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MIMTF trades at $15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 109.60. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while SOUHY trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.81. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ERMAY trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 104.17. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ILKAF trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while LINRF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -62.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ILKAY trades at $16.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while DETRF trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ADMLF trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ADTLF trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.46. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while TAOFF trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while BQSSF trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.25. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 949.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ATUSF trades at $20.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 930M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while AMVMF trades at $28.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -75.84. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while STTSY trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 907.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 849.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while FMCXF trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -50.34. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 776.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PTTMF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while VULNF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while CREQF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 557.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MJDLF trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PMETF trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -112.30. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 541.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while REEMF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 490.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MNXMF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 486.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while FGOVF trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -92.04. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 466.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while CGMLF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 409.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while FWEDF trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while KMRPF trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MLXEF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ERLFF trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -36.40. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MLYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ARAFF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 329.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while SVMLF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 313.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while SRHYY trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while SYAAF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while EMOTF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -25.82. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while MGMNF trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while ARAAF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while STQNF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while PRMNF trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.

GLNCY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLNCY stands at 52.3B. In comparison, NOURF has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GLNCY is priced at $8.72, while NOURF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -33.54, whereas NOURF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GLNCY's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NOURF's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GLNCY is less volatile compared to NOURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLNCY.