Golden Arrow Resources Corporation
Golden Arrow Resources Corporation (GARWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GARWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARWF | $0.05 | -6.98% | 7.7M | -1.14 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.25 | -1.14% | 128.1B | 11.27 | $2.24 | +4.94% |
| RTNTF | $74.71 | -4.46% | 104B | 10.57 | $7.07 | +3.15% |
| RTPPF | $58.71 | -4.54% | 100.1B | 8.29 | $7.07 | +6.86% |
| GMBXF | $6.50 | +2.04% | 50.6B | 13.54 | $0.48 | +3.91% |
| GLNCY | $7.99 | +0.38% | 48.9B | -30.81 | -$0.26 | +2.72% |
| GLCNF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 47.8B | -30.96 | -$0.13 | +2.91% |
| FSUMF | $11.75 | -2.89% | 36.1B | 9.33 | $1.26 | +7.47% |
| FSUGY | $22.72 | -1.35% | 34.9B | 8.98 | $2.53 | +8.06% |
| NGLOY | $14.10 | -1.40% | 31.5B | -9.83 | -$1.44 | +2.24% |
Stock Comparison
GARWF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while BHPLF trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check BHPLF's competition here
GARWF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while RTNTF trades at $74.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check RTNTF's competition here
GARWF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while RTPPF trades at $58.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check RTPPF's competition here
GARWF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while GMBXF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check GMBXF's competition here
GARWF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while GLNCY trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.81. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check GLNCY's competition here
GARWF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while GLCNF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.96. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check GLCNF's competition here
GARWF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while FSUMF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check FSUMF's competition here
GARWF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while FSUGY trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check FSUGY's competition here
GARWF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while NGLOY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check NGLOY's competition here
GARWF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while AAUKF trades at $28.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check AAUKF's competition here
GARWF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while CMCLF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check CMCLF's competition here
GARWF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while TCKRF trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 99.39. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check TCKRF's competition here
GARWF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while IVPAF trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check IVPAF's competition here
GARWF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while IPOAF trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check IPOAF's competition here
GARWF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check BOLIF's competition here
GARWF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check JXMNF's competition here
GARWF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while BDNNY trades at $61.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check BDNNY's competition here
GARWF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while SHTLF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check SHTLF's competition here
GARWF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ABML's competition here
GARWF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check STMNF's competition here
GARWF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while LYSDY trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 169.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check LYSDY's competition here
GARWF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while LYSCF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 167.50. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check LYSCF's competition here
GARWF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while SMMYY trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check SMMYY's competition here
GARWF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PUTKY trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PUTKY's competition here
GARWF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PUTKF's competition here
GARWF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check NILSY's competition here
GARWF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PAEKY's competition here
GARWF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MALRY trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MALRY's competition here
GARWF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MALRF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MALRF's competition here
GARWF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PILBF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -103.20. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PILBF's competition here
GARWF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check FLMMF's competition here
GARWF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while NGXXF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -49.77. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check NGXXF's competition here
GARWF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check IIDDY's competition here
GARWF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check CHZQ's competition here
GARWF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check IPGDF's competition here
GARWF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PTNDY's competition here
GARWF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MIMTF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MIMTF's competition here
GARWF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check DWMNF's competition here
GARWF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check NICMF's competition here
GARWF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check AZZVF's competition here
GARWF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check AFBOF's competition here
GARWF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 109.60. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ERMAF's competition here
GARWF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while SOUHY trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.96. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check SOUHY's competition here
GARWF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PTNDF's competition here
GARWF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ERMAY trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.75. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ERMAY's competition here
GARWF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ILKAF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ILKAF's competition here
GARWF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check TAOFF's competition here
GARWF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ILKAY trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ILKAY's competition here
GARWF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while DETRF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check DETRF's competition here
GARWF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ADTLF's competition here
GARWF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ADMLF trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ADMLF's competition here
GARWF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while LINRF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -50.13. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check LINRF's competition here
GARWF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check AZRMF's competition here
GARWF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MFRVF's competition here
GARWF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while FMCXF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -46.55. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check FMCXF's competition here
GARWF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 972.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ATUSF trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ATUSF's competition here
GARWF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 941.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while AMVMF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -76.79. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check AMVMF's competition here
GARWF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check STTSY's competition here
GARWF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ALMTF's competition here
GARWF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 861.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check AFMJF's competition here
GARWF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check AUSDF's competition here
GARWF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check CTJHF's competition here
GARWF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while VULNF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check VULNF's competition here
GARWF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while CREQF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check CREQF's competition here
GARWF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check NCKAF's competition here
GARWF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 519.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MJDLF trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MJDLF's competition here
GARWF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while FGOVF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -94.05. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check FGOVF's competition here
GARWF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check TTNNF's competition here
GARWF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PTTMF's competition here
GARWF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check OSTTF's competition here
GARWF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MCRZF's competition here
GARWF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while BQSSF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check BQSSF's competition here
GARWF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 462.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MNXMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -70.75. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MNXMF's competition here
GARWF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 455.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while REEMF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -29.40. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check REEMF's competition here
GARWF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 443.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PMETF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -91.13. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PMETF's competition here
GARWF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check BIRNF's competition here
GARWF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while CGMLF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check CGMLF's competition here
GARWF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while KMRPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check KMRPF's competition here
GARWF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check NQMIY's competition here
GARWF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 375.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while SLGGF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check SLGGF's competition here
GARWF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MLYF's competition here
GARWF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check CTJHY's competition here
GARWF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while FWEDF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check FWEDF's competition here
GARWF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PXMFF's competition here
GARWF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 345.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ERLFF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.28. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ERLFF's competition here
GARWF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MLXEF's competition here
GARWF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MCHHF's competition here
GARWF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while RTLGF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check RTLGF's competition here
GARWF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check SVMLF's competition here
GARWF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check BSSMF's competition here
GARWF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while SRHYY trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check SRHYY's competition here
GARWF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check ARAFF's competition here
GARWF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 278.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while PRMNF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -18.56. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check PRMNF's competition here
GARWF vs LTSRF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check LTSRF's competition here
GARWF vs LRSRF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check LRSRF's competition here
GARWF vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 257.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MGMNF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MGMNF's competition here
GARWF vs SYAAF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while SYAAF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check SYAAF's competition here
GARWF vs STQNF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check STQNF's competition here
GARWF vs MMILF Comparison August 2025
GARWF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GARWF stands at 7.7M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GARWF is priced at $0.05, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GARWF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, GARWF's ROE is -1.54%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GARWF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GARWF.Check MMILF's competition here