Fiverr International Ltd.

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GOOGL trades at $202.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GOOGL's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GOOG trades at $203.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GOOG's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while META trades at $782.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check META's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SPOT trades at $698.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 162.09. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SPOT's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while DASH trades at $247.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 135.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DASH's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while RDDT trades at $243.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 109.99. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check RDDT's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TWTR's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TME trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TME's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while BIDU trades at $88.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BIDU's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while PINS trades at $36.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PINS's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while Z trades at $85.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -315.22. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check Z's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ZG trades at $81.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -301.33. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZG's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while NBIS trades at $68.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is 79.58. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NBIS's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TWLO trades at $100.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 1057.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TWLO's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YNDX's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SNAP trades at $7.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SNAP's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while MTCH trades at $38.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MTCH's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while DJT trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 205.56. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DJT's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while DJTWW trades at $9.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -23.09. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DJTWW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check IACVV's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while CARG trades at $31.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CARG's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GENI trades at $12.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -41.65. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GENI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while IAC trades at $35.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check IAC's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while WB trades at $11.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check WB's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while JOYY trades at $50.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.31. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check JOYY's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while DOYU trades at $7.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DOYU's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YY's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while YELP trades at $31.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YELP's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while NN trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NN's ROE of -8.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NN's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while OPRA trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check OPRA's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ANGIV's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while MOMO trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MOMO's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GRPN trades at $29.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -101.79. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GRPN's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 985.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TBLA trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TBLA's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 855.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while EVER trades at $23.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check EVER's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ATHM trades at $28.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ATHM's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ANGI trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ANGI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 771.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while NNAVW trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -8.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NNAVW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 761.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SSTK trades at $21.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SSTK's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 750.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GETY trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GETY's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 719.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while JFIN trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check JFIN's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while KIND trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check KIND's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 704.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SMWB trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SMWB's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 701.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TBLAW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TBLAW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 655.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while MAX trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is -90.82. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAX's ROE of +14.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MAX's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 594M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while THRY trades at $13.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check THRY's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TTGT trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TTGT's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 432.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while UPXI trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check UPXI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 412.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while PERI trades at $8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -70.38. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PERI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ZH trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -139.50. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZH's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 326.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while AREN trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AREN's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check AREN's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check OB's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 236.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TRVG trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TRVG's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TRUE trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TRUE's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SEAT trades at $17.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SEAT's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while MNY trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MNY's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ILLR trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +37.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ILLR's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ILLRW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +37.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ILLRW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while BZFD trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BZFD's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while IZEA trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check IZEA's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ASST trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ASST's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while CCG trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CCG's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BODY's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ZDGE trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -25.96. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZDGE's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while PODC trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PODC's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check EGLX's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while BODI trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BODI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SCOR trades at $6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SCOR's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GIFT trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GIFT's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while NAMI trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NAMI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SOGP trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SOGP's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LTRPA's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LTRPB's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LYL's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check HRYU's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LIZI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LCFYW trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -136.36. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LCFYW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FAZE's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FAZEW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LKCO's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while KRKR trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check KRKR's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LCFY trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LCFY's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check QTT's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LOV's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ONFO trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONFO's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ROI's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while CRTD trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CRTD's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while MNYWW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MNYWW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while CMCM trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CMCM's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SLE trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLE's ROE of -3210.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SLE's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while TC trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TC's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check STBX's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 974.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while ONFOW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONFOW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 647.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SEATW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SEATW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -21.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SLGG's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 249.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while FENG trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FENG's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GROM's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GROMW's competition here

FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 824.8M. In comparison, AUTO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $22.04, while AUTO trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 45.66, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check AUTO's competition here