Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited FSUMF Peers
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $9.99 | +0.00% | 31.2B | 8.06 | $1.26 | +8.71% |
| BHPLF | $22.05 | +0.00% | 116.5B | 10.25 | $2.24 | +5.40% |
| RTNTF | $71.00 | +4.41% | 101.6B | 10.04 | $7.07 | +3.31% |
| RTPPF | $58.54 | -0.01% | 98.4B | 8.23 | $7.07 | +6.91% |
| GLNCY | $7.78 | +0.00% | 47.4B | -30.65 | -$0.26 | +2.70% |
| GLCNF | $3.95 | +0.00% | 47.3B | -30.62 | -$0.13 | +2.89% |
| GMBXF | $5.95 | +0.00% | 46.9B | 12.55 | $0.48 | +3.10% |
| AAUKF | $29.65 | +2.24% | 40.9B | -10.33 | -$2.87 | +2.45% |
| NGLOY | $14.74 | +0.00% | 31.8B | -10.35 | -$1.44 | +2.25% |
| FSUGY | $19.98 | +0.00% | 31.1B | 8.01 | $2.53 | +8.94% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while BHPLF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while RTNTF trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while RTPPF trades at $58.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while GLNCY trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while GLCNF trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while GMBXF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while AAUKF trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while NGLOY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while FSUGY trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while CMCLF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while IVPAF trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while IPOAF trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs JXMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while BDNNY trades at $62.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while SHTLF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while SMMYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while LYSDY trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 138.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while LYSCF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 183.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while PUTKY trades at $26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MALRY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while PILBF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -85.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while NGXXF trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -42.68. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while IIDDY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while IPGDF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while SOUHY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CXXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while CXXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ERMAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 94.74. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ERMAY trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 88.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTRFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while RTRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ADTLF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while DETRF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ADMLF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while BQSSF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -73.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while LINRF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -48.41. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ILKAF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ILKAY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 973.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while TAOFF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 957.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while FMCXF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -56.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 935.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ATUSF trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 922.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ALMTF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -26.62. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 820.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while AMVMF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -66.92. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 802.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while AFMJF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while VULNF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 534.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MJDLF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 514.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while FGOVF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -97.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MNXMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 447.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while CGMLF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs VTMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while VTMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 413.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while FWEDF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs KMRPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while KMRPF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs REEMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 387.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while REEMF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLYF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CREQF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs WYCC Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while WYCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CTJHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while PMETF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ERLFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -28.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SVMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs EGMMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, EGMMF has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while EGMMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas EGMMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGMMF's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to EGMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BSSMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs EMOTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while EMOTF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while JMXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LRSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MGMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MGMNF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 258.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while SLGGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STQNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MMILF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RXRLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 31.2B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $9.99, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.06, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.