Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited FSUMF Peers
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $10.00 | -0.99% | 30.7B | 7.94 | $1.26 | +8.85% |
| CHZQ | $0.01 | +4900.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.66 | -1.53% | 125.1B | 11.01 | $2.24 | +5.03% |
| RTPPF | $59.09 | -3.93% | 100.8B | 8.36 | $7.07 | +6.48% |
| RTNTF | $70.50 | -3.56% | 98.5B | 9.97 | $7.07 | +3.33% |
| GLCNF | $3.84 | -0.59% | 46.1B | -29.52 | -$0.13 | +2.99% |
| GLNCY | $7.62 | -1.10% | 45.8B | -29.29 | -$0.26 | +2.82% |
| GMBXF | $5.57 | +1.46% | 43.4B | 11.60 | $0.48 | +4.45% |
| AAUKF | $30.00 | -0.92% | 41.4B | -10.45 | -$2.87 | +2.12% |
| FSUGY | $19.57 | -0.61% | 30.1B | 7.74 | $2.53 | +9.27% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs CHZQ Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while CHZQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while BHPLF trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BHPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 100.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while RTPPF trades at $59.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while RTNTF trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while GLCNF trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -29.52. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while GLNCY trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while GMBXF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while AAUKF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AAUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while FSUGY trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while NGLOY trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CNSUF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while CNSUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CNSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while CMCLF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while TCKRF trades at $32.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 648.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs JXMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while IVPAF trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while BDNNY trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while IPOAF trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while SMMYY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while LYSDY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 175.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while LYSCF trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 172.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PUTKY trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while AFBOF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while NGXXF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -41.14. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PILBF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -74.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MALRY trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PWCRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PWCRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while DWMNF trades at $36.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MIMTF trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while NICMF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while SOUHY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while IIDDY trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ERMAF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 100.53. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ERMAY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while NCKAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CXXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while CXXMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CXXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while DETRF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ADTLF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ADMLF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MFRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while STTSY trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while BQSSF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ILKAF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ILKAY trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while TTNNF trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 980M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while LINRF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -40.37. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 930.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while FMCXF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -55.14. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while OSTTF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 913.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ATUSF trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 854.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while AUSDF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while AFMJF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GERFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 828.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 718.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while TAOFF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 676M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while AMVMF trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -55.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 650.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ALMTF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -18.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while VULNF trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while BIRNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TMRFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, TMRFF has a market cap of 502.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while TMRFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas TMRFF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMRFF's ROE of -2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and TMRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 495.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while JMXXF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and JMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs PKREF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MJDLF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 447M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while FGOVF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -84.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs BSSMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while BSSMF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 410.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MNXMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -71.43. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs WYCC Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while WYCC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs REEMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 356.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while REEMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CTJHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while CTJHY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 340.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ERLFF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BELMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 337.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while BELMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs KMRPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLYCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MLYCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MLYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 318.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.91. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ARAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 307M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while FWEDF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 291.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while CGMLF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MLXEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs EGMMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, EGMMF has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while EGMMF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas EGMMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGMMF's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to EGMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SVMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERDCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 273.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while ERDCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LRSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while SLGGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STQNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MMILF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.00, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.94, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).