Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited (FSUMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $14.75 | +0.68% | 45.4B | 11.71 | $1.26 | +5.64% |
| RTNTF | $109.53 | +5.82% | 178B | 17.99 | $6.09 | +3.64% |
| BHPLF | $34.45 | -2.85% | 175B | 17.14 | $2.01 | +3.74% |
| RTPPF | $88.92 | +0.00% | 144.5B | 14.63 | $6.08 | +4.53% |
| GMBXF | $10.50 | -3.67% | 82.5B | 16.31 | $0.65 | +2.86% |
| GLCNF | $7.03 | -0.42% | 82.2B | 234.33 | $0.03 | +1.42% |
| GLNCY | $13.69 | -2.98% | 81B | 227.50 | $0.06 | +1.24% |
| CMCLF | $2.50 | -2.34% | 54.1B | 22.73 | $0.11 | +1.42% |
| AAUKF | $44.76 | -2.27% | 48B | -42.63 | -$1.05 | +0.51% |
| NGLOY | $20.75 | -5.16% | 44.7B | -39.06 | -$0.53 | +0.47% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while RTNTF trades at $109.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTNTF's competition here
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 175B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while BHPLF trades at $34.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BHPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHPLF's competition here
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while RTPPF trades at $88.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RTPPF's competition here
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while GMBXF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GMBXF's competition here
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 82.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while GLCNF trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is 234.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and GLCNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLCNF's competition here
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while GLNCY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is 227.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLNCY's competition here
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while CMCLF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CMCLF's competition here
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while AAUKF trades at $44.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -42.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AAUKF's competition here
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while NGLOY trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -39.06. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGLOY's competition here
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while FSUGY trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FSUGY's competition here
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while TCKRF trades at $50.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TCKRF's competition here
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while IPOAF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IPOAF's competition here
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while BDNNY trades at $130.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BDNNY's competition here
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while STMNF trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 113.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check STMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while SMMYY trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 109.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SMMYY's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while LYSCF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 233.08. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSCF's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while LYSDY trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 232.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSDY's competition here
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while SHTLF trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SHTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while SOUHY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SOUHY's competition here
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while IVPAF trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 47.68. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IVPAF's competition here
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PILBF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -168.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PILBF's competition here
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MALRY trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MALRY's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MALRF trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ABML's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PUTKY trades at $34.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PUTKY's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PUTKF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while IPGDF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MIMTF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 43.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PTNDF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDF's competition here
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while IIDDY trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IIDDY's competition here
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while NGXXF trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -45.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PAEKY's competition here
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while DWMNF trades at $63.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PTNDY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDY's competition here
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while LINRF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LINRF's competition here
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FLMMF's competition here
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while NICMF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while AFBOF trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AFBOF's competition here
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while FMCXF trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -104.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FMCXF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ILKAF trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ILKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ILKAY trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ILKAY's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ERMAY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAY's competition here
FSUMF vs PTTMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTTMF's competition here
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while TAOFF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ERMAF trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERMAF's competition here
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while DETRF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DETRF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ADMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ATUSF trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ATUSF's competition here
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while AMVMF trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -74.14. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AMVMF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while AUSDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AUSDF's competition here
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while TTNNF trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 56.69. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TTNNF's competition here
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SLGGF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MFRVF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while AFMJF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AFMJF's competition here
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while NCKAF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NCKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs PXMFF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PXMFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PXMFF's competition here
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 987.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MJDLF trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 92.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MJDLF's competition here
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STTSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STTSY's competition here
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 917.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MCHHF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MCHHF's competition here
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ALMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs SYAXF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 857.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while SYAXF trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SYAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SYAXF's competition here
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 805.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MNXMF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -123.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MNXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BIRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIRNF's competition here
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 718M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MLXEF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MLXEF's competition here
FSUMF vs GDQMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while GDQMF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -172.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and GDQMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDQMF's competition here
FSUMF vs NTCPF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 632.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while NTCPF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -71.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NTCPF's competition here
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 607.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while FWEDF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -17.06. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FWEDF's competition here
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 607.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while OSTTF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and OSTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSTTF's competition here
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 602.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PMETF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -164.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PMETF's competition here
FSUMF vs OMZNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 565.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while OMZNF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check OMZNF's competition here
FSUMF vs MRRDF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 562.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MRRDF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MRRDF's competition here
FSUMF vs CTJHF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 559.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while CTJHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CTJHF's competition here
FSUMF vs TLOFF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 537.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while TLOFF trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TLOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 537M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while FGOVF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FGOVF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 526.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ARAFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -21.30. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAFF's competition here
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 524.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while VULNF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check VULNF's competition here
FSUMF vs BENZF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 512.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while BENZF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -35.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BENZF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 506M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ARAAF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAAF's competition here
FSUMF vs UURAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 496.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while UURAF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check UURAF's competition here
FSUMF vs CHXMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 493.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while CHXMF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CHXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 486.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while CGMLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs MGMNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 479.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MGMNF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 191.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MGMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs CREQF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 474.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while CREQF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CREQF's competition here
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MCRZF's competition here
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 446.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while BQSSF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -17.94. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BQSSF's competition here
FSUMF vs PRMNF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PRMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs ECRAF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while ECRAF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ECRAF's competition here
FSUMF vs CXOXF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while CXOXF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -16.03. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CXOXF's competition here
FSUMF vs DBLVF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, DBLVF has a market cap of 389.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while DBLVF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas DBLVF's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBLVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to DBLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DBLVF's competition here
FSUMF vs SVMLF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 381.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while SVMLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SVMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
FSUMF vs MLYF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MLYF's competition here
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while JMXXF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and JMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs REEMF Comparison March 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 45.4B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.75, while REEMF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.71, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -72.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check REEMF's competition here