Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited FSUMF Peers
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $10.80 | +3.35% | 33.20B | 8.57 | $1.26 | +8.19% |
| BHPLF | $25.36 | +0.69% | 128.69B | 11.32 | $2.24 | +4.89% |
| RTNTF | $74.00 | -3.10% | 102.59B | 10.47 | $7.07 | +3.18% |
| RTPPF | $57.54 | -3.13% | 98.96B | 8.14 | $7.07 | +6.99% |
| GLCNF | $3.53 | +4.75% | 42.42B | -27.15 | -$0.13 | +3.26% |
| GLNCY | $7.00 | +4.98% | 42.07B | -26.93 | -$0.26 | +3.07% |
| GMBXF | $5.35 | +2.29% | 41.65B | 11.63 | $0.46 | +2.41% |
| NGLOY | $14.26 | +4.39% | 34.61B | -11.32 | -$1.26 | +2.26% |
| AAUKF | $28.02 | +1.52% | 34.00B | -11.08 | -$2.53 | +2.27% |
| FSUGY | $20.93 | +1.55% | 32.17B | 8.27 | $2.53 | +8.69% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while BHPLF trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 102.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while RTNTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.96B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while RTPPF trades at $57.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while GLCNF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while GLNCY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -26.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while GMBXF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.61B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while NGLOY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AAUKF trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while FSUGY trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while CMCLF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.93B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while IVPAF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while BDNNY trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs JXMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while IPOAF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 111.11. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while SMMYY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PUTKY trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while LYSDY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while LYSCF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PILBF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -101.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MALRY trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CHZQ Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while NGXXF trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -35.58. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while SOUHY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ERMAY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while NICMF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while DETRF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ILKAY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while LINRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while FMCXF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -65.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ILKAF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while BQSSF trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 890.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ADTLF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 875.94M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ATUSF trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 818.82M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 818.35M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ADMLF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 703.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AMVMF trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -21.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 639.67M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while VULNF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CTJHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PXMFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 560.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 480.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MJDLF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 469.39M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ALMTF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -41.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs REEMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 374.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while REEMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 369.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while FGOVF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CTJHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 346.36M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ERLFF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs KMRPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 334.33M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MNXMF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -58.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs MLYF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 327.69M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 317.53M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 314.76M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while MLXEF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AUMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SVMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 284.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while SVMLF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 283.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while CGMLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 281.48M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 262.47M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while FWEDF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LRSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 259.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PMETF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STQNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs RXRLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs BSRUF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs EMOTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 234.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while EMOTF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -22.28. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTTMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERDCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 232.88M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while ERDCF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -64.15. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CILLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
FSUMF vs SYAAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 229.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while SYAAF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GSCCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 33.20B. In comparison, GSCCF has a market cap of 220.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $10.80, while GSCCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.57, whereas GSCCF's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GSCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.