Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited (FSUMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $14.25 | -1.04% | 44.3B | 13.09 | $1.10 | +4.92% |
| BHPLF | $35.24 | -5.52% | 192.9B | 21.46 | $1.77 | +2.89% |
| RTNTF | $116.24 | +2.65% | 190.2B | 18.51 | $6.28 | +3.26% |
| RTPPF | $96.95 | +2.05% | 158.2B | 15.45 | $6.28 | +3.85% |
| GMBXF | $12.13 | +3.23% | 93.4B | 18.46 | $0.65 | +2.23% |
| GLNCY | $13.85 | +1.91% | 81.4B | -42.84 | -$0.32 | +1.24% |
| GLCNF | $6.92 | +1.76% | 79.6B | -42.50 | -$0.16 | +1.47% |
| CMCLF | $2.97 | +0.68% | 64.7B | 27.18 | $0.11 | +1.18% |
| NGLOY | $24.64 | +0.28% | 58.9B | -30.90 | -$0.80 | +0.52% |
| AAUKF | $50.85 | +4.82% | 49B | -28.90 | -$1.59 | +0.63% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while BHPLF trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BHPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHPLF's competition here
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while RTNTF trades at $116.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTNTF's competition here
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while RTPPF trades at $96.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while GMBXF trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GMBXF's competition here
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while GLNCY trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -42.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLNCY's competition here
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while GLCNF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GLCNF's competition here
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while CMCLF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CMCLF's competition here
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while NGLOY trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGLOY's competition here
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AAUKF trades at $50.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -28.90. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AAUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAUKF's competition here
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while FSUGY trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FSUGY's competition here
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while TCKRF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCKRF's competition here
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while IPOAF trades at $61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IPOAF's competition here
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while BDNNY trades at $148.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BDNNY's competition here
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while SMMYY trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 108.47. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SMMYY's competition here
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while IVPAF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 52.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check IVPAF's competition here
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while STMNF trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 100.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while SHTLF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while SOUHY trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SOUHY's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while LYSCF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 1119.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSCF's competition here
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while LYSDY trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 1105.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LYSDY's competition here
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PILBF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PILBF's competition here
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MALRY trades at $38.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MALRY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MALRY's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PUTKY trades at $36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PUTKY's competition here
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ABML's competition here
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MALRF trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MALRF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PUTKF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while NGXXF trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -54.85. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NGXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MIMTF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PTNDY trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 69.77. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDY's competition here
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while IPGDF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while IIDDY trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIDDY's competition here
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PTNDF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDF's competition here
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while LINRF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check LINRF's competition here
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while NICMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FLMMF's competition here
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while DWMNF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while FMCXF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -121.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FMCXF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AFBOF trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 123.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFBOF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AUSDF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ERMAY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERMAY's competition here
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while DETRF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check DETRF's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ILKAY trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILKAY's competition here
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ILKAF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ILKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs PTTMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTTMF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ERMAF trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERMAF's competition here
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ATUSF trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ATUSF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ADMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTLF's competition here
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AMVMF trades at $41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMVMF's competition here
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AFMJF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check AFMJF's competition here
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while TAOFF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MCHHF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHHF's competition here
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check SLGGF's competition here
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MFRVF's competition here
FSUMF vs PXMFF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PXMFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXMFF's competition here
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MJDLF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 87.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MJDLF's competition here
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and STTSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STTSY's competition here
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while TTNNF trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and TTNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTNNF's competition here
FSUMF vs SYAXF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while SYAXF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and SYAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYAXF's competition here
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 884.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MNXMF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -135.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ALMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 835.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while NCKAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NCKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCKAF's competition here
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 817.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MLXEF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MLXEF's competition here
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BIRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIRNF's competition here
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while VULNF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
FSUMF vs CHXMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 651.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while CHXMF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CHXMF's competition here
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while CGMLF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CGMLF's competition here
FSUMF vs GDQMF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while GDQMF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -172.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GDQMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check GDQMF's competition here
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PMETF trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -197.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PMETF's competition here
FSUMF vs BENZF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 628.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while BENZF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check BENZF's competition here
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while OSTTF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and OSTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSTTF's competition here
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while FGOVF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -106.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FGOVF's competition here
FSUMF vs NTCPF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 563.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while NTCPF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -64.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check NTCPF's competition here
FSUMF vs UURAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while UURAF trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check UURAF's competition here
FSUMF vs MRRDF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 548.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MRRDF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MRRDF's competition here
FSUMF vs MGMNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 542.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MGMNF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 217.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MGMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 535.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while FWEDF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check FWEDF's competition here
FSUMF vs OMZNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 526.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while OMZNF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check OMZNF's competition here
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while BQSSF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and BQSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BQSSF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ARAAF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAAF's competition here
FSUMF vs ECRAF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 478.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ECRAF trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ECRAF's competition here
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check MCRZF's competition here
FSUMF vs TLOFF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 452.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while TLOFF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check TLOFF's competition here
FSUMF vs RGLSF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 439.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while RGLSF trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -175.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RGLSF's competition here
FSUMF vs PRMNF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check PRMNF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ERLFF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERLFF's competition here
FSUMF vs JMXXF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 417.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while JMXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and JMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMXXF's competition here
FSUMF vs CTJHY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while CTJHY trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHY's competition here
FSUMF vs RTRFF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while RTRFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check RTRFF's competition here
FSUMF vs AUMTF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while AUMTF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and AUMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUMTF's competition here
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 387.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ARAFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ARAFF's competition here
FSUMF vs ERDCF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while ERDCF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check ERDCF's competition here
FSUMF vs CXOXF Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while CXOXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.Check CXOXF's competition here
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison February 2026
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 44.3B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $14.25, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.09, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here