Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited FSUMF Peers
See (FSUMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | $11.66 | +3.64% | 35.3B | 9.18 | $1.25 | +7.71% |
| BHPLF | $27.50 | +6.09% | 136B | 11.96 | $2.24 | +4.63% |
| CHZQ | $0.00 | -0.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RTNTF | $76.35 | +5.54% | 106.5B | 10.80 | $7.07 | +6.48% |
| RTPPF | $61.66 | +1.35% | 105.3B | 8.72 | $7.07 | +6.52% |
| GLNCY | $8.70 | +7.14% | 50.1B | -32.13 | -$0.26 | +4.12% |
| GLCNF | $4.37 | +7.11% | 49.9B | -32.31 | -$0.13 | +4.29% |
| GMBXF | $6.20 | +0.90% | 47.6B | 12.75 | $0.48 | +3.04% |
| FSUGY | $23.47 | +6.92% | 34.7B | 8.93 | $2.53 | +8.01% |
| NGLOY | $15.83 | +5.96% | 33.3B | -10.73 | -$1.44 | +2.05% |
Stock Comparison
FSUMF vs BHPLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while BHPLF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CHZQ Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTNTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while RTNTF trades at $76.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTPPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while RTPPF trades at $61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLNCY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while GLNCY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -32.13. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GLCNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while GLCNF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -32.31. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GMBXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while GMBXF trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FSUGY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while FSUGY trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGLOY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while NGLOY trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AAUKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while AAUKF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CNSUF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while CNSUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CNSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CMCLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while CMCLF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TCKRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs JXMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IVPAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while IVPAF trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPOAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while IPOAF trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BOLIF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BDNNY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while BDNNY trades at $66.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SHTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while SHTLF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ABML Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while STMNF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SMMYY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while SMMYY trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while LYSDY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 166.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LYSCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while LYSCF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 166.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PUTKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PUTKY trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PUTKF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NILSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PAEKY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MALRY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MALRY trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PILBF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PILBF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -117.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FLMMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NGXXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while NGXXF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -47.23. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IIDDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while IIDDY trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFBOF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs IPGDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while IPGDF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PWCRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PWCRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NICMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while NICMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MIMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MIMTF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs DWMNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PTNDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AZZVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MALRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MALRF trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERMAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 107.74. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CXXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while CXXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERMAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ERMAY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 104.17. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SOUHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while SOUHY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.08. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LINRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while LINRF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -67.68. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs RTRFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while RTRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NCKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ILKAF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs DETRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while DETRF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ILKAY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ILKAY trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADTLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ADTLF trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ADMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ADMLF trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AZRMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TAOFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while TAOFF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AUSDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MFRVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs STTSY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BQSSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while BQSSF trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -64.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs TTNNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AMVMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 930M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while AMVMF trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -75.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ATUSF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 926.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ATUSF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs OSTTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs AFMJF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 901M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while AFMJF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ALMTF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FMCXF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 860.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while FMCXF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -50.96. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs GERFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 838.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CREQF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 725.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while CREQF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MJDLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MJDLF trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs VULNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while VULNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs REEMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 531.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while REEMF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -34.33. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BIRNF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PMETF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 496.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PMETF trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MNXMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MNXMF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -76.65. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CGMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 466.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while CGMLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCRZF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FGOVF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 456.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while FGOVF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MCHHF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs VTMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while VTMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs PXMFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ARAFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ARAFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs FWEDF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 399.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while FWEDF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs KMRPF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 398M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while KMRPF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BELMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while BELMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs NQMIY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs ERLFF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 377.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while ERLFF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -36.42. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLXEF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 376.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MLXEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLYF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SRHYY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 364.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while SRHYY trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs WYCC Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while WYCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs CTJHY Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SVMLF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while SVMLF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs MLYCF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 320.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while MLYCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to MLYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SYAAF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while SYAAF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs LTSRF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 296.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs SLGGF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.
FSUMF vs BSSMF Comparison
FSUMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUMF stands at 35.3B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUMF is priced at $11.66, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUMF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.18, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FSUMF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUMF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUMF.