Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited FSUGY Peers
See (FSUGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUGY | $19.98 | -0.65% | 30.8B | 7.92 | $2.53 | +9.08% |
| BHPLF | $22.05 | -5.93% | 121.8B | 10.71 | $2.24 | +5.17% |
| RTNTF | $71.00 | +4.41% | 101.6B | 10.04 | $7.07 | +3.24% |
| RTPPF | $58.54 | -0.39% | 99.1B | 8.28 | $7.07 | +6.87% |
| GMBXF | $5.95 | -1.49% | 46.3B | 12.40 | $0.48 | +3.16% |
| GLNCY | $7.78 | -0.13% | 46.3B | -29.89 | -$0.26 | +2.76% |
| GLCNF | $3.95 | +1.02% | 46.2B | -29.92 | -$0.13 | +2.95% |
| AAUKF | $29.65 | +4.04% | 39.3B | -9.93 | -$2.87 | +2.55% |
| FSUMF | $9.99 | -0.60% | 30.7B | 7.93 | $1.26 | +8.86% |
| CMCLF | $0.93 | -7.50% | 23.6B | 9.25 | $0.10 | +3.83% |
Stock Comparison
FSUGY vs BHPLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while BHPLF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs RTNTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while RTNTF trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs RTPPF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while RTPPF trades at $58.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs GMBXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while GMBXF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs GLNCY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while GLNCY trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -29.89. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs GLCNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while GLCNF trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -29.92. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AAUKF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AAUKF trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FSUMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while FSUMF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CMCLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while CMCLF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs TCKRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NGLOY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while NGLOY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IPOAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while IPOAF trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IVPAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while IVPAF trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BOLIF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs JXMNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BDNNY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while BDNNY trades at $62.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SHTLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while SHTLF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SMMYY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while SMMYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 61.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ABML Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs STMNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LYSDY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while LYSDY trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 142.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LYSCF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while LYSCF trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 185.47. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PUTKF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PUTKY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while PUTKY trades at $26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NILSY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PAEKY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FLMMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PILBF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while PILBF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -89.08. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MALRY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MALRY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NGXXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while NGXXF trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -39.87. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MIMTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MIMTF trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PTNDY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IIDDY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while IIDDY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs DWMNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PTNDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AZZVF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs IPGDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while IPGDF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MALRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AFBOF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SOUHY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while SOUHY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.69. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CXXMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while CXXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NCKAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ERMAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ERMAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 94.74. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ERMAY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ERMAY trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 88.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NICMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs RTRFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while RTRFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs DETRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while DETRF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BQSSF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while BQSSF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -76.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ADMLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ADMLF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ADTLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ADTLF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LINRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while LINRF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ILKAF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ILKAF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AZRMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs STTSY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ILKAY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ILKAY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MFRVF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs TTNNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs TAOFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 973.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while TAOFF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ALMTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 952.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ALMTF trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FMCXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 949M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while FMCXF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -56.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ATUSF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 934.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ATUSF trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs OSTTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AUSDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AMVMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 820.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AMVMF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -66.92. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AFMJF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 800.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AFMJF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs VULNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while VULNF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MJDLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 534.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MJDLF trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BIRNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CGMLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 505.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while CGMLF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs KMRPF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while KMRPF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FGOVF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 486.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while FGOVF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MCRZF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MCHHF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs VTMLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while VTMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs FWEDF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 395.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while FWEDF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MNXMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 384.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MNXMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs REEMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 381.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while REEMF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs NQMIY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MLYF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CREQF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs WYCC Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while WYCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs CTJHY Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LTSRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ERLFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 311.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ERLFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MLXEF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs SLGGF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while SLGGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs PMETF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while PMETF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -59.40. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs EGMMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, EGMMF has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while EGMMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas EGMMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGMMF's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to EGMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs ARAFF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY and ARAFF have similar daily volatility (3.19).
FSUGY vs SVMLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 280.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while SVMLF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs BSSMF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 277.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs EMOTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while EMOTF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs JMXXF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while JMXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs LRSRF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs AUMTF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 253.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while AUMTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs STQNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MGMNF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MGMNF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs MMILF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.
FSUGY vs RXRLF Comparison
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 30.8B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $19.98, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.92, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.