Fortescue Metals Group Limited
Fortescue Metals Group Limited (FSUGY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSUGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUGY | $24.70 | +3.22% | 38B | 9.78 | $2.53 | +7.35% |
| BHPLF | $27.28 | -1.20% | 138.4B | 12.18 | $2.24 | +4.55% |
| RTNTF | $80.31 | +5.18% | 112.5B | 11.36 | $7.07 | +2.93% |
| RTPPF | $61.66 | +0.00% | 105.1B | 8.72 | $7.07 | +6.52% |
| GLCNF | $4.37 | -0.68% | 51.9B | -33.58 | -$0.13 | +2.63% |
| GLNCY | $8.67 | -1.98% | 51.6B | -33.37 | -$0.26 | +2.48% |
| GMBXF | $6.39 | -0.93% | 49.7B | 13.31 | $0.48 | +2.90% |
| FSUMF | $12.74 | +6.17% | 39.2B | 10.11 | $1.26 | +7.03% |
| NGLOY | $15.68 | -1.94% | 34.3B | -10.90 | -$1.44 | +2.02% |
| AAUKF | $30.55 | -4.53% | 33B | -10.64 | -$2.87 | +2.38% |
Stock Comparison
FSUGY vs BHPLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while BHPLF trades at $27.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BHPLF's competition here
FSUGY vs RTNTF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while RTNTF trades at $80.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check RTNTF's competition here
FSUGY vs RTPPF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while RTPPF trades at $61.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check RTPPF's competition here
FSUGY vs GLCNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while GLCNF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -33.58. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check GLCNF's competition here
FSUGY vs GLNCY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while GLNCY trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -33.37. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check GLNCY's competition here
FSUGY vs GMBXF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while GMBXF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check GMBXF's competition here
FSUGY vs FSUMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while FSUMF trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FSUMF's competition here
FSUGY vs NGLOY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while NGLOY trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NGLOY's competition here
FSUGY vs AAUKF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while AAUKF trades at $30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AAUKF's competition here
FSUGY vs CMCLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while CMCLF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CMCLF's competition here
FSUGY vs TCKRF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while TCKRF trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 735.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check TCKRF's competition here
FSUGY vs IVPAF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while IVPAF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IVPAF's competition here
FSUGY vs IPOAF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while IPOAF trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IPOAF's competition here
FSUGY vs BOLIF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BOLIF's competition here
FSUGY vs BDNNY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while BDNNY trades at $65.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BDNNY's competition here
FSUGY vs JXMNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check JXMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs SHTLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while SHTLF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -37.60. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SHTLF's competition here
FSUGY vs STMNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while STMNF trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 61.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check STMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs LYSDY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while LYSDY trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 179.75. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LYSDY's competition here
FSUGY vs SMMYY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while SMMYY trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SMMYY's competition here
FSUGY vs ABML Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ABML's competition here
FSUGY vs LYSCF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while LYSCF trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 178.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LYSCF's competition here
FSUGY vs PUTKY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PUTKY trades at $29.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PUTKY's competition here
FSUGY vs PUTKF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PUTKF's competition here
FSUGY vs NILSY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NILSY's competition here
FSUGY vs PAEKY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PAEKY's competition here
FSUGY vs MALRY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MALRY trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MALRY's competition here
FSUGY vs PILBF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PILBF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -124.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PILBF's competition here
FSUGY vs MALRF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MALRF trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MALRF's competition here
FSUGY vs FLMMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FLMMF's competition here
FSUGY vs NGXXF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while NGXXF trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NGXXF's competition here
FSUGY vs IPGDF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while IPGDF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IPGDF's competition here
FSUGY vs CHZQ Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CHZQ's competition here
FSUGY vs IIDDY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while IIDDY trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check IIDDY's competition here
FSUGY vs NICMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while NICMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NICMF's competition here
FSUGY vs PTNDY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PTNDY's competition here
FSUGY vs MIMTF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MIMTF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MIMTF's competition here
FSUGY vs DWMNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check DWMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs AZZVF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AZZVF's competition here
FSUGY vs SOUHY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while SOUHY trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.78. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SOUHY's competition here
FSUGY vs AFBOF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AFBOF's competition here
FSUGY vs ERMAF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 109.60. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ERMAF's competition here
FSUGY vs ERMAY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ERMAY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 104.17. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ERMAY's competition here
FSUGY vs PTNDF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PTNDF's competition here
FSUGY vs LINRF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while LINRF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -63.28. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LINRF's competition here
FSUGY vs ILKAF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ILKAF trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ILKAF's competition here
FSUGY vs ILKAY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ILKAY trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ILKAY's competition here
FSUGY vs DETRF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while DETRF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check DETRF's competition here
FSUGY vs ADTLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ADTLF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.64. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ADTLF's competition here
FSUGY vs ADMLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ADMLF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.93. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ADMLF's competition here
FSUGY vs TAOFF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while TAOFF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.38. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check TAOFF's competition here
FSUGY vs AZRMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AZRMF's competition here
FSUGY vs MFRVF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MFRVF's competition here
FSUGY vs FMCXF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while FMCXF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FMCXF's competition here
FSUGY vs BQSSF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 997.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while BQSSF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -60.12. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BQSSF's competition here
FSUGY vs ATUSF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 993.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ATUSF trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ATUSF's competition here
FSUGY vs AMVMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 930M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while AMVMF trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -75.84. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AMVMF's competition here
FSUGY vs STTSY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check STTSY's competition here
FSUGY vs AFMJF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 908.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AFMJF's competition here
FSUGY vs ALMTF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ALMTF's competition here
FSUGY vs AUSDF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check AUSDF's competition here
FSUGY vs CREQF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 809.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while CREQF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CREQF's competition here
FSUGY vs VULNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 656.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while VULNF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check VULNF's competition here
FSUGY vs CTJHF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CTJHF's competition here
FSUGY vs FGOVF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 581.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while FGOVF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -110.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FGOVF's competition here
FSUGY vs MJDLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 565.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MJDLF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MJDLF's competition here
FSUGY vs NCKAF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NCKAF's competition here
FSUGY vs REEMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 547.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while REEMF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check REEMF's competition here
FSUGY vs PMETF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 532.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PMETF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -109.37. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PMETF's competition here
FSUGY vs CGMLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 505.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while CGMLF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CGMLF's competition here
FSUGY vs MNXMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 496.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MNXMF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -75.96. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MNXMF's competition here
FSUGY vs TTNNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check TTNNF's competition here
FSUGY vs PXMFF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 491.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PXMFF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PXMFF's competition here
FSUGY vs PTTMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check PTTMF's competition here
FSUGY vs OSTTF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check OSTTF's competition here
FSUGY vs MCRZF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MCRZF's competition here
FSUGY vs BIRNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BIRNF's competition here
FSUGY vs MCHHF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MCHHF's competition here
FSUGY vs KMRPF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while KMRPF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check KMRPF's competition here
FSUGY vs FWEDF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 385M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while FWEDF trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.27. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check FWEDF's competition here
FSUGY vs MLXEF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MLXEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MLXEF's competition here
FSUGY vs NQMIY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check NQMIY's competition here
FSUGY vs ERLFF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 375.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ERLFF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -36.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ERLFF's competition here
FSUGY vs MLYF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MLYF's competition here
FSUGY vs CTJHY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check CTJHY's competition here
FSUGY vs ARAFF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ARAFF's competition here
FSUGY vs SRHYY Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while SRHYY trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SRHYY's competition here
FSUGY vs SVMLF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 336.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while SVMLF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SVMLF's competition here
FSUGY vs SLGGF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 315.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while SLGGF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SLGGF's competition here
FSUGY vs LTSRF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -13.01. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LTSRF's competition here
FSUGY vs BSSMF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check BSSMF's competition here
FSUGY vs RTLGF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check RTLGF's competition here
FSUGY vs SYAAF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 283.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while SYAAF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check SYAAF's competition here
FSUGY vs MGMNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while MGMNF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check MGMNF's competition here
FSUGY vs ARAAF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ARAAF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ARAAF's competition here
FSUGY vs LRSRF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check LRSRF's competition here
FSUGY vs EMOTF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 258.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while EMOTF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check EMOTF's competition here
FSUGY vs ERDCF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 256M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while ERDCF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check ERDCF's competition here
FSUGY vs STQNF Comparison July 2025
FSUGY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSUGY stands at 38B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSUGY is priced at $24.70, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSUGY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.78, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, FSUGY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSUGY is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSUGY.Check STQNF's competition here