First Potomac Realty Trust
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FPO
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FPO
First Potomac Realty Trust (FPO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FPO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPO | $11.14 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EQIX | $1,000.37 | +0.44% | 98.3B | 72.81 | $13.74 | +1.92% |
| AMT | $173.73 | +1.58% | 81.3B | 32.17 | $5.40 | +3.91% |
| CCI | $84.78 | +4.89% | 37B | 33.64 | $2.52 | +5.01% |
| IRM | $103.30 | +2.33% | 30.6B | 210.82 | $0.49 | +3.19% |
| SBAC | $204.04 | +18.93% | 21.6B | 20.82 | $9.80 | +2.24% |
| WY | $24.43 | +0.95% | 17.6B | 54.29 | $0.45 | +3.44% |
| LAMR | $127.64 | +1.29% | 13B | 22.12 | $5.77 | +5.09% |
| GLPI | $44.42 | +0.25% | 12.6B | 15.06 | $2.95 | +7.02% |
| OUT | $27.11 | +1.73% | 4.8B | 33.06 | $0.82 | +4.43% |
Stock Comparison
FPO vs EQIX Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EQIX trades at $1,000.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 72.81. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EQIX's competition here
FPO vs AMT Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while AMT trades at $173.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check AMT's competition here
FPO vs CCI Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while CCI trades at $84.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check CCI's competition here
FPO vs IRM Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while IRM trades at $103.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 210.82. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check IRM's competition here
FPO vs SBAC Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SBAC trades at $204.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SBAC's competition here
FPO vs WY Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while WY trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check WY's competition here
FPO vs LAMR Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while LAMR trades at $127.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check LAMR's competition here
FPO vs GLPI Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while GLPI trades at $44.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check GLPI's competition here
FPO vs OUT Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while OUT trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check OUT's competition here
FPO vs EPR Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR's competition here
FPO vs TIPRX Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, TIPRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while TIPRX trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIPRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TIPRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is more volatile compared to TIPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check TIPRX's competition here
FPO vs RYN Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while RYN trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 44.89. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check RYN's competition here
FPO vs PCH Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while PCH trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check PCH's competition here
FPO vs UNIT Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while UNIT trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check UNIT's competition here
FPO vs EPR-PE Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR-PE trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR-PE's competition here
FPO vs CXW Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while CXW trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check CXW's competition here
FPO vs EPR-PC Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR-PC trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR-PC's competition here
FPO vs EPR-PG Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR-PG trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR-PG's competition here
FPO vs SMA Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SMA trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is -154.45. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SMA's competition here
FPO vs LANDP Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 720.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while LANDP trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check LANDP's competition here
FPO vs FPI Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 507.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while FPI trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check FPI's competition here
FPO vs KRSOX Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, KRSOX has a market cap of 301.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while KRSOX trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is more volatile compared to KRSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check KRSOX's competition here
FPO vs AFCG Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while AFCG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFCG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check AFCG's competition here
FPO vs PW Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while PW trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check PW's competition here
FPO vs SIR Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SIR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SIR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SIR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SIR's competition here
FPO vs SFC Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SFC trades at $91.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SFC's competition here
FPO vs FUR Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, FUR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while FUR trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to FUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check FUR's competition here
FPO vs CTT Comparison April 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check CTT's competition here