First Potomac Realty Trust (FPO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FPO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPO | $11.14 | +0.00% | 0 | 4801.72 | $0.00 | N/A |
| EQIX | $1,002.02 | -1.14% | 98.8B | 37.59 | $26.66 | +1.97% |
| AMT | $166.03 | -0.03% | 77.4B | 18.51 | $8.97 | +4.20% |
| DLR-PL | $19.70 | -0.20% | 63.2B | 5.07 | $3.88 | +2.82% |
| DLR-PK | $22.31 | +0.19% | 52.8B | 5.74 | $3.88 | +2.82% |
| IRM | $117.16 | -3.89% | 34.9B | 21.58 | $5.43 | +2.88% |
| CCI | $76.60 | +0.09% | 33.4B | 21.28 | $3.60 | +5.55% |
| VICI | $27.19 | +3.48% | 29.3B | 9.31 | $2.92 | +6.62% |
| DLR-PJ | $20.06 | +0.05% | 21.5B | 5.16 | $3.88 | +2.82% |
| SBAC | $184.56 | +2.11% | 19.6B | 17.38 | $10.62 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
FPO vs EQIX Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EQIX trades at $1,002.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EQIX's competition here
FPO vs AMT Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while AMT trades at $166.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check AMT's competition here
FPO vs DLR-PL Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while DLR-PL trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check DLR-PL's competition here
FPO vs DLR-PK Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while DLR-PK trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check DLR-PK's competition here
FPO vs IRM Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while IRM trades at $117.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check IRM's competition here
FPO vs CCI Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while CCI trades at $76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check CCI's competition here
FPO vs VICI Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while VICI trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check VICI's competition here
FPO vs DLR-PJ Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while DLR-PJ trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check DLR-PJ's competition here
FPO vs SBAC Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SBAC trades at $184.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SBAC's competition here
FPO vs LAMR Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while LAMR trades at $157.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check LAMR's competition here
FPO vs GLPI Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while GLPI trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check GLPI's competition here
FPO vs OUT Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while OUT trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check OUT's competition here
FPO vs EPR Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR trades at $59.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR's competition here
FPO vs EPR-PG Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR-PG trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR-PG's competition here
FPO vs EPR-PE Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR-PE trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR-PE's competition here
FPO vs EPR-PC Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while EPR-PC trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check EPR-PC's competition here
FPO vs TIPRX Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, TIPRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while TIPRX trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas TIPRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TIPRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is more volatile compared to TIPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check TIPRX's competition here
FPO vs RYN Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while RYN trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check RYN's competition here
FPO vs PCH Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while PCH trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check PCH's competition here
FPO vs CXW Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while CXW trades at $31.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check CXW's competition here
FPO vs BXDC Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, BXDC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while BXDC trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas BXDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BXDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to BXDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check BXDC's competition here
FPO vs SMA Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SMA trades at $33.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is 224.47. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SMA's competition here
FPO vs LANDO Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 739.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while LANDO trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -221.48. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LANDO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check LANDO's competition here
FPO vs LANDP Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 729.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while LANDP trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is -218.93. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LANDP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check LANDP's competition here
FPO vs FPI Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 423.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while FPI trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check FPI's competition here
FPO vs LAND Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while LAND trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check LAND's competition here
FPO vs LANDM Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while LANDM trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -208.93. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LANDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check LANDM's competition here
FPO vs KRSOX Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, KRSOX has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while KRSOX trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas KRSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KRSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is more volatile compared to KRSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check KRSOX's competition here
FPO vs PW Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 345.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while PW trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check PW's competition here
FPO vs CTT Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check CTT's competition here
FPO vs SIR Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SIR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SIR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas SIR's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SIR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SIR's competition here
FPO vs SFC Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, SFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while SFC trades at $91.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas SFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to SFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check SFC's competition here
FPO vs FUR Comparison July 2026
FPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FPO stands at 0. In comparison, FUR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FPO is priced at $11.14, while FUR trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FPO currently has a P/E ratio of 4801.72, whereas FUR's P/E ratio is -202.21. In terms of profitability, FPO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FPO is less volatile compared to FUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FPO.Check FUR's competition here