First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM.TO | CA$37.57 | +4.51% | 31.1B | -939.25 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$37.96 | +7.90% | 32.4B | 22.33 | CA$1.70 | +0.36% |
| HBM.TO | CA$32.89 | +8.23% | 13.1B | 16.45 | CA$2.00 | +0.06% |
| CS.TO | CA$11.89 | +7.21% | 9.1B | 20.86 | CA$0.57 | N/A |
| ERO.TO | CA$41.95 | +4.88% | 4.4B | 11.92 | CA$3.52 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$9.99 | +6.39% | 3.1B | -111.00 | -CA$0.09 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$18.16 | +10.13% | 2.9B | -16.51 | -CA$1.10 | N/A |
| III.TO | CA$8.17 | +3.94% | 1.5B | 9.50 | CA$0.86 | N/A |
| ASCU.TO | CA$7.93 | +8.19% | 1.4B | -198.25 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| FDY.TO | CA$4.53 | +4.86% | 1.3B | -37.75 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FM.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while LUN.TO trades at CA$37.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check LUN.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while HBM.TO trades at CA$32.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs CS.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while CS.TO trades at CA$11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while ERO.TO trades at CA$41.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ERO.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while TKO.TO trades at CA$9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -111.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs IE.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while IE.TO trades at CA$18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -16.51. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs III.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while III.TO trades at CA$8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check III.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -198.25. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while FDY.TO trades at CA$4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -37.75. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check FDY.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while MARI.TO trades at CA$8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -24.83. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 889.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while ARG.TO trades at CA$5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check AYM.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs GCU.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, GCU.TO has a market cap of 172M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while GCU.TO trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas GCU.TO's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to GCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check GCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs ATCU.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ATCU.TO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while ATCU.TO trades at CA$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas ATCU.TO's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATCU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to ATCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check ATCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check CCI.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check DNT.TO's competition here
FM.TO vs XXIX.V Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, XXIX.V has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while XXIX.V trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas XXIX.V's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XXIX.V's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to XXIX.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check XXIX.V's competition here
FM.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FM.TO has daily volatility of 5.95 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -15.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check AFX.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs WEC.V Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, WEC.V has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while WEC.V trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas WEC.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WEC.V's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to WEC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check WEC.V's competition here
FM.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check JUBA.CN's competition here
FM.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison April 2026
FM.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FM.TO stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FM.TO is priced at CA$37.57, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -939.25, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FM.TO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FM.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FM.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here