CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CTO
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CTO
CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTO | $20.08 | +1.57% | 653.5M | 250.88 | $0.08 | +7.58% |
| VICI | $29.01 | +2.15% | 31B | 11.12 | $2.61 | +6.14% |
| WPC | $73.98 | +1.50% | 16.2B | 35.07 | $2.11 | +4.95% |
| EPRT | $33.50 | +1.92% | 7B | 26.17 | $1.28 | +3.64% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.1B | 24.42 | $1.76 | +6.20% |
| BNL | $20.36 | +1.80% | 3.9B | 40.74 | $0.50 | +5.74% |
| SRC-PA | $24.26 | +0.46% | 3.8B | 13.55 | $1.79 | +6.20% |
| AFINP | $25.91 | -1.78% | 3.4B | -90.91 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| AFINO | $25.66 | +0.08% | 3.4B | -90.04 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| PSB-PY | $11.95 | +0.00% | 3B | 2.97 | $4.02 | +2.36% |
Stock Comparison
CTO vs VICI Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while VICI trades at $29.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check VICI's competition here
CTO vs WPC Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while WPC trades at $73.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check WPC's competition here
CTO vs EPRT Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while EPRT trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check EPRT's competition here
CTO vs SRC Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SRC's competition here
CTO vs BNL Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while BNL trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check BNL's competition here
CTO vs SRC-PA Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SRC-PA's competition here
CTO vs AFINP Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AFINP's competition here
CTO vs AFINO Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AFINO's competition here
CTO vs PSB-PY Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB-PY's competition here
CTO vs DBRG-PJ Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while DBRG-PJ trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -21.53. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG-PJ's competition here
CTO vs DBRG-PH Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while DBRG-PH trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -21.51. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG-PH's competition here
CTO vs DBRG-PI Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while DBRG-PI trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -21.26. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG-PI's competition here
CTO vs DBRG Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while DBRG trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG's competition here
CTO vs UE Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while UE trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check UE's competition here
CTO vs RTLPO Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check RTLPO's competition here
CTO vs RTLPP Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check RTLPP's competition here
CTO vs NYMTG Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, NYMTG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while NYMTG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas NYMTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NYMTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to NYMTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check NYMTG's competition here
CTO vs GNL Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GNL trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -11.99. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PA Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GNL-PA trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -166.62. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PA's competition here
CTO vs CLNY Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while CLNY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CLNY's competition here
CTO vs CLNC Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CLNC's competition here
CTO vs AAT Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while AAT trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AAT's competition here
CTO vs AFIN Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AFIN's competition here
CTO vs SAFE Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while SAFE trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SAFE's competition here
CTO vs RTL Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check RTL's competition here
CTO vs GOODN Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GOODN trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -661.76. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOODN's competition here
CTO vs ESRT Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 935.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while ESRT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check ESRT's competition here
CTO vs PKST Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 778.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while PKST trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PKST's competition here
CTO vs BRSP Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 778.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while BRSP trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -22.98. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check BRSP's competition here
CTO vs STAR-PG Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR-PG's competition here
CTO vs STAR-PI Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR-PI's competition here
CTO vs STAR-PD Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR-PD's competition here
CTO vs CTO-PA Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 675.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while CTO-PA trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CTO-PA's competition here
CTO vs STAR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR's competition here
CTO vs GOOD Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 619.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GOOD trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 91.43. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOOD's competition here
CTO vs GOODO Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 614.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GOODO trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 686.55. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOODO's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PD Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 515.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GNL-PD trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PD's competition here
CTO vs OLP Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 513.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while OLP trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check OLP's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PE Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 487.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GNL-PE trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PE's competition here
CTO vs AHH Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 484.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while AHH trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AHH's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PB Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 467.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GNL-PB trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -158.90. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PB's competition here
CTO vs FVR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 384.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while FVR trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -78.36. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check FVR's competition here
CTO vs MDV-PA Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while MDV-PA trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MDV-PA's competition here
CTO vs AHH-PA Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while AHH-PA trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AHH-PA's competition here
CTO vs MDRRP Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MDRRP's competition here
CTO vs MDRR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while MDRR trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MDRR's competition here
CTO vs SQFTP Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while SQFTP trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -12.23. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SQFTP's competition here
CTO vs MKZR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while MKZR trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MKZR's competition here
CTO vs SQFT Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while SQFT trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SQFT's competition here
CTO vs CORR-PA Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CORR-PA's competition here
CTO vs GIPR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GIPR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPR's ROE of +6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GIPR's competition here
CTO vs CORR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CORR's competition here
CTO vs GIPRW Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 210.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GIPRW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of +6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GIPRW's competition here
CTO vs SQFTW Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 29.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while SQFTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SQFTW's competition here
CTO vs NRF Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, NRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while NRF trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas NRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to NRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check NRF's competition here
CTO vs PSB Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, PSB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while PSB trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB's competition here
CTO vs PSB-PZ Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, PSB-PZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB-PZ's competition here
CTO vs STOR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, STOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while STOR trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STOR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STOR's competition here
CTO vs PSB-PX Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, PSB-PX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB-PX's competition here
CTO vs VER-PF Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, VER-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check VER-PF's competition here
CTO vs MGP Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, MGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while MGP trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MGP's competition here
CTO vs APTS Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, APTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while APTS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check APTS's competition here
CTO vs VER Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, VER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while VER trades at $51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check VER's competition here
CTO vs GOODM Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, GOODM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while GOODM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOODM's competition here
CTO vs FSPR Comparison April 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 653.5M. In comparison, FSPR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $20.08, while FSPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 250.88, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check FSPR's competition here