Phoenix New Media Limited
Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FENG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FENG | $1.71 | +0.00% | 427.9K | -3.05 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| SPOT | $472.13 | -2.71% | 101B | 39.38 | $12.46 | N/A |
| DASH | $165.66 | -5.98% | 76B | 89.49 | $1.97 | N/A |
| BIDU | $135.46 | -1.20% | 46.1B | 12.04 | $11.28 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| RDDT | $145.94 | -0.13% | 28.7B | 57.37 | $2.62 | N/A |
| NBIS | $98.43 | -8.54% | 23.5B | 890.18 | $0.11 | N/A |
| TME | $14.90 | -2.17% | 23.3B | 15.05 | $1.01 | +1.18% |
| TWLO | $107.85 | -2.81% | 17.4B | 538.81 | $0.21 | N/A |
| YNDX | $18.94 | +0.00% | 15.1B | -15.52 | -$1.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FENG vs SPOT Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SPOT trades at $472.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SPOT's competition here
FENG vs DASH Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while DASH trades at $165.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 89.49. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check DASH's competition here
FENG vs BIDU Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while BIDU trades at $135.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check BIDU's competition here
FENG vs TWTR Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TWTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TWTR's competition here
FENG vs RDDT Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while RDDT trades at $145.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 57.37. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check RDDT's competition here
FENG vs NBIS Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while NBIS trades at $98.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is 890.18. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check NBIS's competition here
FENG vs TME Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TME trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TME's competition here
FENG vs TWLO Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TWLO trades at $107.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is 538.81. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TWLO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TWLO's competition here
FENG vs YNDX Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check YNDX's competition here
FENG vs PINS Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while PINS trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check PINS's competition here
FENG vs Z Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while Z trades at $44.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas Z's P/E ratio is 505.11. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to Z's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check Z's competition here
FENG vs ZG Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ZG trades at $44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is 504.67. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ZG's competition here
FENG vs SNAP Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SNAP trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SNAP's competition here
FENG vs JOYY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while JOYY trades at $62.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -29.93. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check JOYY's competition here
FENG vs DJT Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while DJT trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -24.07. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check DJT's competition here
FENG vs DJTWW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while DJTWW trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check DJTWW's competition here
FENG vs WB Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while WB trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check WB's competition here
FENG vs NN Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while NN trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NN's ROE of +48.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check NN's competition here
FENG vs YY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check YY's competition here
FENG vs GENI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while GENI trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check GENI's competition here
FENG vs YELP Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while YELP trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check YELP's competition here
FENG vs MOMO Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while MOMO trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check MOMO's competition here
FENG vs OPRA Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while OPRA trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check OPRA's competition here
FENG vs TBLA Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TBLA trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TBLA's competition here
FENG vs NNAVW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 957.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while NNAVW trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of +48.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check NNAVW's competition here
FENG vs GIBO Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, GIBO has a market cap of 800.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while GIBO trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GIBO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GIBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to GIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check GIBO's competition here
FENG vs KIND Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while KIND trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check KIND's competition here
FENG vs ANGIV Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ANGIV's competition here
FENG vs NXDR Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, NXDR has a market cap of 654.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while NXDR trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NXDR's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NXDR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to NXDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check NXDR's competition here
FENG vs ATHM Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 626.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ATHM trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ATHM's competition here
FENG vs WSHP Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, WSHP has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while WSHP trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas WSHP's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WSHP's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to WSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check WSHP's competition here
FENG vs SSTK Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 571.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SSTK trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SSTK's competition here
FENG vs EVER Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 565.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while EVER trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check EVER's competition here
FENG vs GRPN Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 532.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while GRPN trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check GRPN's competition here
FENG vs MAX Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 514.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while MAX trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is -392.00. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MAX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check MAX's competition here
FENG vs FVRR Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 431.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while FVRR trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check FVRR's competition here
FENG vs PERI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 372.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while PERI trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check PERI's competition here
FENG vs ANGI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 362.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ANGI trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ANGI's competition here
FENG vs TTGT Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 344.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TTGT trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TTGT's competition here
FENG vs JFIN Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 336M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while JFIN trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check JFIN's competition here
FENG vs GETY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 308.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while GETY trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check GETY's competition here
FENG vs ZH Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ZH trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ZH's competition here
FENG vs OB Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check OB's competition here
FENG vs SMWB Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SMWB trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SMWB's competition here
FENG vs TRUE Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TRUE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TRUE's competition here
FENG vs TRVG Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TRVG trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TRVG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TRVG's competition here
FENG vs THRY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while THRY trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to THRY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check THRY's competition here
FENG vs AREN Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while AREN trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AREN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check AREN's competition here
FENG vs DOYU Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while DOYU trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check DOYU's competition here
FENG vs PODC Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while PODC trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check PODC's competition here
FENG vs CCG Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while CCG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check CCG's competition here
FENG vs MNY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while MNY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check MNY's competition here
FENG vs IZEA Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while IZEA trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check IZEA's competition here
FENG vs BODI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while BODI trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check BODI's competition here
FENG vs BODY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BODY's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check BODY's competition here
FENG vs SEAT Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SEAT trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SEAT's competition here
FENG vs UPXI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while UPXI trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -3.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check UPXI's competition here
FENG vs ZDGE Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ZDGE trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -36.22. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ZDGE's competition here
FENG vs ILLR Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ILLR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ILLR's competition here
FENG vs SCOR Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SCOR trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SCOR's competition here
FENG vs EGLX Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check EGLX's competition here
FENG vs TC Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TC trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TC's competition here
FENG vs IACVV Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while IACVV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check IACVV's competition here
FENG vs NAMI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while NAMI trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check NAMI's competition here
FENG vs BZFD Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while BZFD trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check BZFD's competition here
FENG vs LTRPA Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LTRPA's competition here
FENG vs LTRPB Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LTRPB's competition here
FENG vs LYL Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LYL's competition here
FENG vs HRYU Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check HRYU's competition here
FENG vs LIZI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LIZI's competition here
FENG vs FAZE Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check FAZE's competition here
FENG vs FAZEW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check FAZEW's competition here
FENG vs LKCO Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LKCO's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LKCO's competition here
FENG vs KRKR Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while KRKR trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check KRKR's competition here
FENG vs LCFY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LCFY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LCFY's competition here
FENG vs CRTD Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while CRTD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check CRTD's competition here
FENG vs QTT Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check QTT's competition here
FENG vs LOV Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LOV's competition here
FENG vs TBLAW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while TBLAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check TBLAW's competition here
FENG vs SEGG Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SEGG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SEGG's competition here
FENG vs LCFYW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while LCFYW trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -32.60. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check LCFYW's competition here
FENG vs ROI Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ROI's competition here
FENG vs CMCM Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while CMCM trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check CMCM's competition here
FENG vs ONFO Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ONFO trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ONFO's competition here
FENG vs ILLRW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ILLRW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ILLRW's competition here
FENG vs MNYWW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while MNYWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check MNYWW's competition here
FENG vs DGLY Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while DGLY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check DGLY's competition here
FENG vs STBX Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check STBX's competition here
FENG vs SEATW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 492.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SEATW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SEATW's competition here
FENG vs SLGG Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +11.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SLGG's competition here
FENG vs ONFOW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 256.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while ONFOW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check ONFOW's competition here
FENG vs SLE Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 252.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SLE trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLE's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SLE's competition here
FENG vs GIBOW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, GIBOW has a market cap of 76.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while GIBOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GIBOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GIBOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to GIBOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check GIBOW's competition here
FENG vs GROMW Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check GROMW's competition here
FENG vs GROM Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check GROM's competition here
FENG vs SFUN Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SFUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SFUN trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SFUN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SFUN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is less volatile compared to SFUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SFUN's competition here
FENG vs BLCT Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while BLCT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check BLCT's competition here
FENG vs AUTO Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, AUTO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while AUTO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check AUTO's competition here
FENG vs SOGO Comparison February 2026
FENG plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FENG stands at 427.9K. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FENG is priced at $1.71, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FENG currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FENG's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FENG is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FENG.Check SOGO's competition here