Faraday Copper Corp.
Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FDY.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDY.TO | CA$1.09 | -1.80% | 224M | -8.38 | -CA$0.13 | N/A |
| FM.TO | CA$22.18 | -4.77% | 18.4B | 63.37 | CA$0.35 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$13.91 | -1.70% | 11.9B | 81.82 | CA$0.17 | +2.34% |
| CS.TO | CA$8.17 | +5.15% | 6.2B | 58.36 | CA$0.14 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | CA$12.51 | -2.72% | 4.9B | 23.17 | CA$0.54 | +0.16% |
| ERO.TO | CA$18.51 | -1.28% | 1.9B | 9.69 | CA$1.91 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$13.18 | -0.72% | 1.7B | -11.17 | -CA$1.18 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$4.25 | +0.00% | 1.3B | -20.24 | -CA$0.21 | N/A |
| MARI.TO | CA$9.80 | -1.01% | 1B | -54.44 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| AYM.TO | CA$5.78 | +8.85% | 835.8M | 10.70 | CA$0.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FDY.TO vs FM.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while FM.TO trades at CA$22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 63.37. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check FM.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while LUN.TO trades at CA$13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 81.82. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check LUN.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs CS.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while CS.TO trades at CA$8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 58.36. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while HBM.TO trades at CA$12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while ERO.TO trades at CA$18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check ERO.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs IE.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while IE.TO trades at CA$13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while TKO.TO trades at CA$4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -20.24. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while MARI.TO trades at CA$9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -54.44. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check AYM.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs III.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while III.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check III.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 347.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while ARG.TO trades at CA$2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check DNT.TO's competition here
FDY.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FDY.TO has daily volatility of 3.67 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
FDY.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check CCI.CN's competition here
FDY.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check AFX.CN's competition here
FDY.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check JUBA.CN's competition here
FDY.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison August 2025
FDY.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDY.TO stands at 224M. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FDY.TO is priced at CA$1.09, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDY.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.38, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FDY.TO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDY.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDY.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here