Forum Energy Metals Corp.
Forum Energy Metals Corp. (FDCFF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FDCFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCFF | $0.03 | -0.23% | 9.5M | -1.53 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.50 | +1.76% | 129.4B | 14.41 | $1.77 | +4.86% |
| RTNTF | $71.91 | +0.00% | 116.8B | 11.45 | $6.28 | +5.32% |
| RTPPF | $60.73 | +0.00% | 98.6B | 9.67 | $6.28 | +6.14% |
| GMBXF | $6.90 | +4.07% | 53.7B | 13.80 | $0.50 | +3.52% |
| CYLYF | $0.02 | +0.00% | 49.6B | -0.79 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| GLNCY | $7.93 | +0.76% | 48B | -24.77 | -$0.32 | +2.71% |
| GLCNF | $3.96 | +0.51% | 47B | -24.75 | -$0.16 | +2.90% |
| FSUGY | $25.60 | +1.15% | 39.6B | 10.17 | $2.53 | +7.06% |
| FSUMF | $12.84 | +1.10% | 39.5B | 10.19 | $1.26 | +6.90% |
Stock Comparison
FDCFF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while BHPLF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check BHPLF's competition here
FDCFF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while RTNTF trades at $71.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check RTNTF's competition here
FDCFF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while RTPPF trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check RTPPF's competition here
FDCFF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while GMBXF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check GMBXF's competition here
FDCFF vs CYLYF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, CYLYF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while CYLYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CYLYF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to CYLYF's ROE of -10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to CYLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check CYLYF's competition here
FDCFF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while GLNCY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -24.77. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check GLNCY's competition here
FDCFF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while GLCNF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -24.75. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check GLCNF's competition here
FDCFF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while FSUGY trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check FSUGY's competition here
FDCFF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while FSUMF trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check FSUMF's competition here
FDCFF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while NGLOY trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check NGLOY's competition here
FDCFF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while AAUKF trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check AAUKF's competition here
FDCFF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while CMCLF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check CMCLF's competition here
FDCFF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while TCKRF trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCKRF's competition here
FDCFF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while IPOAF trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPOAF's competition here
FDCFF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while IVPAF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check IVPAF's competition here
FDCFF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while BDNNY trades at $69.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check BDNNY's competition here
FDCFF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
FDCFF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check JXMNF's competition here
FDCFF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while LYSDY trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 311.33. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check LYSDY's competition here
FDCFF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while LYSCF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 311.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check LYSCF's competition here
FDCFF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while SHTLF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check SHTLF's competition here
FDCFF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while SMMYY trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 64.80. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check SMMYY's competition here
FDCFF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ABML's competition here
FDCFF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
FDCFF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PUTKY trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PUTKY's competition here
FDCFF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
FDCFF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
FDCFF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MALRY trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MALRY's competition here
FDCFF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PILBF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -138.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PILBF's competition here
FDCFF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MALRF trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
FDCFF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
FDCFF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while NGXXF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check NGXXF's competition here
FDCFF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check FLMMF's competition here
FDCFF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while IPGDF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
FDCFF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
FDCFF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while IIDDY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIDDY's competition here
FDCFF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MIMTF trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MIMTF's competition here
FDCFF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PTNDY's competition here
FDCFF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while NICMF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
FDCFF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check DWMNF's competition here
FDCFF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
FDCFF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check AFBOF's competition here
FDCFF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ERMAY trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.51. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ERMAY's competition here
FDCFF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ILKAF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ILKAF's competition here
FDCFF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ILKAY trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ILKAY's competition here
FDCFF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ERMAF trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ERMAF's competition here
FDCFF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while SOUHY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.85. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check SOUHY's competition here
FDCFF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PTNDF's competition here
FDCFF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while DETRF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETRF's competition here
FDCFF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while LINRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check LINRF's competition here
FDCFF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ADMLF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ADMLF's competition here
FDCFF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ADTLF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ADTLF's competition here
FDCFF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while TAOFF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check TAOFF's competition here
FDCFF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while AUSDF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
FDCFF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while NCKAF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check NCKAF's competition here
FDCFF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
FDCFF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while FMCXF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -102.60. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check FMCXF's competition here
FDCFF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MFRVF's competition here
FDCFF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 982M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ATUSF trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ATUSF's competition here
FDCFF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 972.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while AFMJF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check AFMJF's competition here
FDCFF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 957.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while AMVMF trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 92.72. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMVMF's competition here
FDCFF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 899.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check STTSY's competition here
FDCFF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ALMTF's competition here
FDCFF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check BIRNF's competition here
FDCFF vs GTRIF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, GTRIF has a market cap of 663.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while GTRIF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas GTRIF's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to GTRIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to GTRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check GTRIF's competition here
FDCFF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check CTJHF's competition here
FDCFF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 588.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while CREQF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -21.07. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check CREQF's competition here
FDCFF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 578.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while REEMF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check REEMF's competition here
FDCFF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 569.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while SLGGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check SLGGF's competition here
FDCFF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 539.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MJDLF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MJDLF's competition here
FDCFF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 525.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while VULNF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check VULNF's competition here
FDCFF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 511.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MNXMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -78.34. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNXMF's competition here
FDCFF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check TTNNF's competition here
FDCFF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PTTMF's competition here
FDCFF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check OSTTF's competition here
FDCFF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 481.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while BQSSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check BQSSF's competition here
FDCFF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MCRZF's competition here
FDCFF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 462.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PXMFF's competition here
FDCFF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 457.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while FGOVF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -86.54. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check FGOVF's competition here
FDCFF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 454.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PMETF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -140.05. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PMETF's competition here
FDCFF vs VTMLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while VTMLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and VTMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMLF's competition here
FDCFF vs LLLAF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while LLLAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check LLLAF's competition here
FDCFF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 393.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while KMRPF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check KMRPF's competition here
FDCFF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check CGMLF's competition here
FDCFF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
FDCFF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 374.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while FWEDF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check FWEDF's competition here
FDCFF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MLYF's competition here
FDCFF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check CTJHY's competition here
FDCFF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 341.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MCHHF's competition here
FDCFF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MLXEF's competition here
FDCFF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while SVMLF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check SVMLF's competition here
FDCFF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 318.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ERLFF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -30.70. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ERLFF's competition here
FDCFF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 309.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check ARAFF's competition here
FDCFF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
FDCFF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while SRHYY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and SRHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRHYY's competition here
FDCFF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while PRMNF trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check PRMNF's competition here
FDCFF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF and RTLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTLGF's competition here
FDCFF vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 288.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while MGMNF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check MGMNF's competition here
FDCFF vs TLOFF Comparison August 2025
FDCFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FDCFF stands at 9.5M. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 280.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FDCFF is priced at $0.03, while TLOFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FDCFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.53, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FDCFF's ROE is -11.39%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDCFF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDCFF.Check TLOFF's competition here