Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation
Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation (FATH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FATH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATH | $5.05 | -4.17% | 34.7M | 2.15 | $2.35 | N/A |
| ANET | $137.23 | +0.00% | 167.3B | 48.31 | $2.75 | N/A |
| WDC | $284.67 | +0.00% | 96.8B | 27.01 | $10.57 | +0.11% |
| STX | $408.97 | +0.00% | 89.7B | 46.40 | $8.86 | +0.70% |
| DELL | $119.06 | +0.00% | 81.9B | 16.02 | $7.63 | +1.72% |
| PSTG | $73.59 | +0.00% | 24.4B | 194.53 | $0.38 | N/A |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | +4.11% |
| NTAP | $101.60 | +0.00% | 20.5B | 17.85 | $5.74 | +2.03% |
| SMCI | $32.16 | +0.00% | 19.4B | 23.66 | $1.37 | N/A |
| HPQ | $18.34 | +0.03% | 17.4B | 7.02 | $2.65 | +6.35% |
Stock Comparison
FATH vs ANET Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ANET trades at $137.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check ANET's competition here
FATH vs WDC Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while WDC trades at $284.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check WDC's competition here
FATH vs STX Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while STX trades at $408.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 46.40. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STX's ROE of -8.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check STX's competition here
FATH vs DELL Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DELL trades at $119.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DELL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check DELL's competition here
FATH vs PSTG Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while PSTG trades at $73.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 194.53. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check PSTG's competition here
FATH vs CAJ Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CAJ's competition here
FATH vs NTAP Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while NTAP trades at $101.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check NTAP's competition here
FATH vs SMCI Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SMCI trades at $32.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SMCI's competition here
FATH vs HPQ Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while HPQ trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check HPQ's competition here
FATH vs LOGI Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while LOGI trades at $89.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check LOGI's competition here
FATH vs IONQ Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while IONQ trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check IONQ's competition here
FATH vs IONQ-WT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while IONQ-WT trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
FATH vs QBTS-WT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
FATH vs SNDKV Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SNDKV's competition here
FATH vs QBTS Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QBTS trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QBTS's competition here
FATH vs RGTI Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RGTI trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check RGTI's competition here
FATH vs RGTIW Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RGTIW trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check RGTIW's competition here
FATH vs RCAT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RCAT trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -24.45. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check RCAT's competition here
FATH vs QUBT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QUBT trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QUBT's competition here
FATH vs MKFG-WT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
FATH vs CRCT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 978.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CRCT trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CRCT's competition here
FATH vs SSYS Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 892.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SSYS trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SSYS's competition here
FATH vs CRSR Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 599M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CRSR trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -46.83. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CRSR's competition here
FATH vs NNDM Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while NNDM trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check NNDM's competition here
FATH vs BGIN Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while BGIN trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check BGIN's competition here
FATH vs DDD Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DDD trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check DDD's competition here
FATH vs OSS Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while OSS trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -30.37. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check OSS's competition here
FATH vs CAN Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 213.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CAN trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CAN's competition here
FATH vs VELO Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VELO trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VELO's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VELO's competition here
FATH vs TIO Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check TIO's competition here
FATH vs DM Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check DM's competition here
FATH vs VTIX Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VTIX trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VTIX's competition here
FATH vs AMCI Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while AMCI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -592.00. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check AMCI's competition here
FATH vs MICT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check MICT's competition here
FATH vs MKFG Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check MKFG's competition here
FATH vs INVE Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while INVE trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check INVE's competition here
FATH vs ALOT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ALOT trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check ALOT's competition here
FATH vs YIBO Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while YIBO trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check YIBO's competition here
FATH vs UAVS Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while UAVS trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check UAVS's competition here
FATH vs TACT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while TACT trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check TACT's competition here
FATH vs KTCC Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while KTCC trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check KTCC's competition here
FATH vs QMCO Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QMCO trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QMCO's competition here
FATH vs EBON Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while EBON trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check EBON's competition here
FATH vs SGE Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SGE's competition here
FATH vs VLD Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLD's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VLD's competition here
FATH vs SCKT Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SCKT trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SCKT's competition here
FATH vs ZSPC Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ZSPC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check ZSPC's competition here
FATH vs VJET Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VJET's competition here
FATH vs STRCW Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check STRCW's competition here
FATH vs HILL Comparison February 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check HILL's competition here