Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation
Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation FATH Peers
See (FATH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATH | $5.05 | -4.17% | 34.68M | 2.15 | $2.35 | N/A |
| ANET | $92.55 | +0.13% | 116.24B | 39.05 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $111.91 | -0.02% | 76.49B | 17.54 | $6.38 | +1.65% |
| HPQ | $28.49 | -0.42% | 26.86B | 10.25 | $2.78 | +3.93% |
| SMCI | $41.32 | -0.79% | 24.66B | 22.46 | $1.84 | N/A |
| STX | $108.71 | +4.09% | 23.07B | 15.64 | $6.95 | +2.62% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | N/A | 21.97B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $99.78 | +0.21% | 20.59B | 18.48 | $5.40 | +2.07% |
| PSTG | $56.03 | +1.14% | 18.33B | 180.74 | $0.31 | N/A |
| WDC | $49.84 | +0.71% | 17.39B | 17.07 | $2.92 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FATH vs ANET Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 116.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ANET trades at $92.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs DELL Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 76.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DELL trades at $111.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs HPQ Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while HPQ trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs SMCI Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 24.66B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SMCI trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs STX Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 23.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while STX trades at $108.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs CAJ Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 21.97B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs NTAP Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 20.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while NTAP trades at $99.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs PSTG Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while PSTG trades at $56.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 180.74. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs WDC Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 17.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while WDC trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs LOGI Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while LOGI trades at $86.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs IONQ-WT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 12.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while IONQ-WT trades at $34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs IONQ Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.36B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while IONQ trades at $45.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -30.37. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs SNDKV Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs QBTS-WT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.19B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QBTS-WT trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs QBTS Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QBTS trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -28.85. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs RGTIW Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RGTIW trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs RGTI Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RGTI trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs QUBT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QUBT trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -22.35. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs CRCT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CRCT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs MKFG-WT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs CRSR Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 880.43M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CRSR trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs SSYS Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 879.07M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SSYS trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs RCAT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 611.86M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RCAT trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs NNDM Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 343.09M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while NNDM trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs DDD Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 220.99M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DDD trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs CAN Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 200.56M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CAN trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs TIO Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.95M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs DM Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.37M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs ZSPC Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 130.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ZSPC trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs MICT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118.01M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MICT's ROE of -40.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs MKFG Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs YIBO Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 87.34M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while YIBO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs QMCO Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 84.06M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QMCO trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs INVE Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 78.17M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while INVE trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs ALOT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 69.20M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ALOT trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs STRC Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.66M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs OSS Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 55.05M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while OSS trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs TACT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 37.50M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while TACT trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs KTCC Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 33.68M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while KTCC trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs EBON Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 25.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while EBON trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs SGE Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs UAVS Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 11.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while UAVS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs VLD Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs SCKT Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8.40M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SCKT trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs VJET Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.85M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.
FATH vs STRCW Comparison
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.68M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.