Essex Property Trust, Inc.
Essex Property Trust, Inc. ESS Peers
See (ESS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESS | $288.67 | +1.14% | 18.59B | 27.62 | $10.45 | +3.46% |
| AVB | $208.13 | +1.24% | 29.63B | 28.36 | $7.34 | +3.29% |
| EQR | $71.57 | +0.99% | 27.19B | 27.31 | $2.62 | +3.80% |
| INVH | $34.43 | +1.18% | 21.10B | 44.14 | $0.78 | +3.32% |
| MAA | $163.27 | +1.47% | 19.11B | 33.94 | $4.81 | +3.67% |
| MAA-PI | $55.78 | +1.22% | 18.53B | 10.84 | $5.15 | +3.67% |
| SUI | $123.27 | +1.70% | 15.73B | 146.74 | $0.84 | +6.30% |
| AMH-PG | $23.97 | +1.04% | 14.32B | 49.73 | $0.48 | +2.80% |
| AMH | $38.71 | +1.10% | 14.30B | 35.84 | $1.08 | +2.80% |
| AMH-PH | $25.01 | +0.24% | 14.21B | 51.89 | $0.48 | +2.80% |
Stock Comparison
ESS vs AVB Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 29.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while AVB trades at $208.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs EQR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 27.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while EQR trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs INVH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 21.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while INVH trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 44.14. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs MAA Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 19.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while MAA trades at $163.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs MAA-PI Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 18.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while MAA-PI trades at $55.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs SUI Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 15.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while SUI trades at $123.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is 146.74. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH-PG Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while AMH-PG trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 49.73. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 14.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while AMH trades at $38.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AMH-PH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 14.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while AMH-PH trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs UDR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 14.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while UDR trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 117.83. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CPT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 12.78B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while CPT trades at $119.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 109.77. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs ELS Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 12.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while ELS trades at $64.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AIRC Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs MRP Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while MRP trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs IRT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, IRT has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while IRT trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas IRT's P/E ratio is 150.73. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to IRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs VRE Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while VRE trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is -44.46. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs UMH Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while UMH trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 143.38. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs UMH-PD Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while UMH-PD trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 114.26. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CSR-PC Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs AIV Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while AIV trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIV's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CSR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, CSR has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while CSR trades at $63.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CSR's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to CSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs NXRT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 935.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while NXRT trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -29.58. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs BRT Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 300.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while BRT trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -33.81. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs SUNS Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 147.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while SUNS trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs CLPR Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 67.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while CLPR trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is less volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.
ESS vs BHM Comparison
ESS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESS stands at 18.59B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 42.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ESS is priced at $288.67, while BHM trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ESS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESS is more volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESS.