Ero Copper Corp.
Ero Copper Corp. (ERO.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERO.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERO.TO | CA$39.06 | +0.31% | 4.1B | 11.10 | CA$3.52 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$35.04 | -0.28% | 29.9B | 20.61 | CA$1.70 | +0.39% |
| FM.TO | CA$34.59 | -0.86% | 28.6B | -864.75 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | CA$30.09 | -1.51% | 11.9B | 15.05 | CA$2.00 | +0.07% |
| CS.TO | CA$10.99 | -2.92% | 8.4B | 19.28 | CA$0.57 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$9.25 | -1.70% | 2.9B | -102.78 | -CA$0.09 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$17.08 | -2.01% | 2.7B | -15.53 | -CA$1.10 | N/A |
| III.TO | CA$8.08 | -5.50% | 1.4B | 9.08 | CA$0.89 | N/A |
| ASCU.TO | CA$7.23 | -0.41% | 1.3B | -180.75 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| FDY.TO | CA$4.28 | -2.73% | 1.2B | -35.67 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ERO.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while LUN.TO trades at CA$35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check LUN.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs FM.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while FM.TO trades at CA$34.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is -864.75. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check FM.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while HBM.TO trades at CA$30.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs CS.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while CS.TO trades at CA$10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while TKO.TO trades at CA$9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -102.78. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs IE.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while IE.TO trades at CA$17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs III.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while III.TO trades at CA$8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check III.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -180.75. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while FDY.TO trades at CA$4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check FDY.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while MARI.TO trades at CA$8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -25.03. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 853.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while ARG.TO trades at CA$5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check AYM.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs GCU.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GCU.TO has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while GCU.TO trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas GCU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to GCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check GCU.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs ATCU.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ATCU.TO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while ATCU.TO trades at CA$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas ATCU.TO's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATCU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to ATCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check ATCU.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check CCI.CN's competition here
ERO.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check DNT.TO's competition here
ERO.TO vs XXIX.V Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, XXIX.V has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while XXIX.V trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas XXIX.V's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XXIX.V's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is less volatile compared to XXIX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check XXIX.V's competition here
ERO.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ERO.TO has daily volatility of 6.91 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
ERO.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -15.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check AFX.CN's competition here
ERO.TO vs WEC.V Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WEC.V has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while WEC.V trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas WEC.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WEC.V's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to WEC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check WEC.V's competition here
ERO.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check JUBA.CN's competition here
ERO.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison April 2026
ERO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERO.TO stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ERO.TO is priced at CA$39.06, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.10, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, ERO.TO's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERO.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERO.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here