ERAMET S.A.
ERAMET S.A. (ERMAY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERMAY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERMAY | $6.54 | -2.39% | 1.9B | 108.99 | $0.06 | +2.52% |
| BHPLF | $26.71 | -1.07% | 135.5B | 11.92 | $2.24 | +4.37% |
| CHZQ | $0.01 | +4900.01% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RTPPF | $61.50 | -0.65% | 105.4B | 8.70 | $7.07 | +6.54% |
| RTNTF | $78.20 | -2.62% | 101.6B | 10.40 | $7.07 | +3.20% |
| GLNCY | $8.43 | -1.40% | 51.2B | -32.33 | -$0.26 | +2.55% |
| GLCNF | $4.23 | -2.23% | 50.1B | -32.42 | -$0.13 | +2.70% |
| GMBXF | $6.45 | +1.57% | 49.4B | 13.21 | $0.48 | +3.80% |
| FSUMF | $12.00 | -4.08% | 36.9B | 9.52 | $1.26 | +7.14% |
| FSUGY | $23.27 | -2.76% | 35.9B | 9.22 | $2.53 | +7.78% |
Stock Comparison
ERMAY vs BHPLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while BHPLF trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check BHPLF's competition here
ERMAY vs CHZQ Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while CHZQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check CHZQ's competition here
ERMAY vs RTPPF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while RTPPF trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
ERMAY vs RTNTF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while RTNTF trades at $78.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check RTNTF's competition here
ERMAY vs GLNCY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while GLNCY trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -32.33. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check GLNCY's competition here
ERMAY vs GLCNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while GLCNF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -32.42. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check GLCNF's competition here
ERMAY vs GMBXF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while GMBXF trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check GMBXF's competition here
ERMAY vs FSUMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while FSUMF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check FSUMF's competition here
ERMAY vs FSUGY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while FSUGY trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check FSUGY's competition here
ERMAY vs NGLOY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while NGLOY trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check NGLOY's competition here
ERMAY vs AAUKF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while AAUKF trades at $29.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check AAUKF's competition here
ERMAY vs CMCLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while CMCLF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check CMCLF's competition here
ERMAY vs CNSUF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while CNSUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and CNSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNSUF's competition here
ERMAY vs TCKRF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while TCKRF trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 103.18. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check TCKRF's competition here
ERMAY vs JXMNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check JXMNF's competition here
ERMAY vs IVPAF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while IVPAF trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check IVPAF's competition here
ERMAY vs IPOAF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while IPOAF trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPOAF's competition here
ERMAY vs BOLIF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
ERMAY vs BDNNY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while BDNNY trades at $65.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check BDNNY's competition here
ERMAY vs SHTLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while SHTLF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
ERMAY vs ABML Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ABML's competition here
ERMAY vs LYSDY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while LYSDY trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 175.88. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check LYSDY's competition here
ERMAY vs LYSCF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while LYSCF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 175.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check LYSCF's competition here
ERMAY vs STMNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
ERMAY vs SMMYY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while SMMYY trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.90. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check SMMYY's competition here
ERMAY vs PUTKY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PUTKY trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check PUTKY's competition here
ERMAY vs PUTKF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
ERMAY vs NILSY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
ERMAY vs PAEKY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
ERMAY vs MALRY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MALRY trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check MALRY's competition here
ERMAY vs PILBF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PILBF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -111.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check PILBF's competition here
ERMAY vs FLMMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check FLMMF's competition here
ERMAY vs NGXXF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while NGXXF trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -48.45. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check NGXXF's competition here
ERMAY vs IPGDF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while IPGDF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
ERMAY vs ARDNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ARDNF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and ARDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARDNF's competition here
ERMAY vs AFBOF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while AFBOF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFBOF's competition here
ERMAY vs NICMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while NICMF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
ERMAY vs PWCRF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PWCRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check PWCRF's competition here
ERMAY vs IIDDY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while IIDDY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIDDY's competition here
ERMAY vs PTNDY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PTNDY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDY's competition here
ERMAY vs MIMTF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MIMTF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMTF's competition here
ERMAY vs DWMNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check DWMNF's competition here
ERMAY vs PTNDF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDF's competition here
ERMAY vs AZZVF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
ERMAY vs MALRF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
ERMAY vs RTRFF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while RTRFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check RTRFF's competition here
ERMAY vs CXXMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while CXXMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and CXXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CXXMF's competition here
ERMAY vs SOUHY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while SOUHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.35. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check SOUHY's competition here
ERMAY vs ERMAF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ERMAF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.12. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAF's competition here
ERMAY vs NCKAF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while NCKAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check NCKAF's competition here
ERMAY vs ILKAY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ILKAY trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ILKAY's competition here
ERMAY vs ILKAF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ILKAF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ILKAF's competition here
ERMAY vs DETRF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while DETRF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETRF's competition here
ERMAY vs ADTLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ADTLF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ADTLF's competition here
ERMAY vs TAOFF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAOFF's competition here
ERMAY vs LINRF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while LINRF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check LINRF's competition here
ERMAY vs ADMLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ADMLF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ADMLF's competition here
ERMAY vs AZRMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
ERMAY vs AUSDF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
ERMAY vs MFRVF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check MFRVF's competition here
ERMAY vs STTSY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while STTSY trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check STTSY's competition here
ERMAY vs FMCXF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while FMCXF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -47.40. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check FMCXF's competition here
ERMAY vs ATUSF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 984.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ATUSF trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ATUSF's competition here
ERMAY vs TTNNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while TTNNF trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check TTNNF's competition here
ERMAY vs AMVMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 930M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while AMVMF trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -75.84. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check AMVMF's competition here
ERMAY vs OSTTF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while OSTTF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check OSTTF's competition here
ERMAY vs AFMJF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 906.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check AFMJF's competition here
ERMAY vs ALMTF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ALMTF's competition here
ERMAY vs GERFF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 834.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check GERFF's competition here
ERMAY vs VULNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 691.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while VULNF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
ERMAY vs CREQF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 605.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while CREQF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check CREQF's competition here
ERMAY vs MJDLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MJDLF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check MJDLF's competition here
ERMAY vs FGOVF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 544.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while FGOVF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -103.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check FGOVF's competition here
ERMAY vs BQSSF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 531.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while BQSSF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check BQSSF's competition here
ERMAY vs REEMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 526.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while REEMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check REEMF's competition here
ERMAY vs BIRNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while BIRNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check BIRNF's competition here
ERMAY vs PMETF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 492.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PMETF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -101.17. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check PMETF's competition here
ERMAY vs VTMLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 491.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while VTMLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and VTMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMLF's competition here
ERMAY vs CGMLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while CGMLF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check CGMLF's competition here
ERMAY vs MCRZF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check MCRZF's competition here
ERMAY vs MNXMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 456.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MNXMF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.92. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNXMF's competition here
ERMAY vs MCHHF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHHF's competition here
ERMAY vs PXMFF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 422.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check PXMFF's competition here
ERMAY vs RTLGF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 404.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while RTLGF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check RTLGF's competition here
ERMAY vs KMRPF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 392.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while KMRPF trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and KMRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMRPF's competition here
ERMAY vs SLGGF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while SLGGF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check SLGGF's competition here
ERMAY vs BELMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 387.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while BELMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check BELMF's competition here
ERMAY vs NQMIY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
ERMAY vs MLYF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check MLYF's competition here
ERMAY vs ERLFF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 363M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ERLFF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ERLFF's competition here
ERMAY vs WYCC Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while WYCC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check WYCC's competition here
ERMAY vs FWEDF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 353M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while FWEDF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check FWEDF's competition here
ERMAY vs CTJHY Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while CTJHY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHY's competition here
ERMAY vs MLXEF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MLXEF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check MLXEF's competition here
ERMAY vs MLYCF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 320.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while MLYCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and MLYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYCF's competition here
ERMAY vs BSSMF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
ERMAY vs SVMLF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while SVMLF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check SVMLF's competition here
ERMAY vs ARAFF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check ARAFF's competition here
ERMAY vs PRMNF Comparison July 2025
ERMAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAY stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 295.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAY is priced at $6.54, while PRMNF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAY currently has a P/E ratio of 108.99, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -17.70. In terms of profitability, ERMAY's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAY is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAY.Check PRMNF's competition here