ERAMET S.A.
ERAMET S.A. (ERMAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERMAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERMAF | $54.52 | -12.43% | 1.6B | -13.63 | -$4.00 | +3.12% |
| BHPLF | $35.24 | -5.52% | 192.9B | 21.46 | $1.77 | +2.89% |
| RTNTF | $116.24 | +2.65% | 190.2B | 18.51 | $6.28 | +3.26% |
| RTPPF | $96.95 | +2.05% | 158.2B | 15.45 | $6.28 | +3.85% |
| GMBXF | $12.13 | +3.23% | 93.4B | 18.46 | $0.65 | +2.23% |
| GLNCY | $13.85 | +1.91% | 81.4B | -42.84 | -$0.32 | +1.24% |
| GLCNF | $6.85 | +0.74% | 79.6B | -42.50 | -$0.16 | +1.47% |
| CMCLF | $2.97 | +0.68% | 64.7B | 27.18 | $0.11 | +1.18% |
| NGLOY | $24.63 | +0.24% | 58.9B | -30.90 | -$0.80 | +0.52% |
| AAUKF | $50.85 | +4.82% | 49B | -28.90 | -$1.59 | +0.63% |
Stock Comparison
ERMAF vs BHPLF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while BHPLF trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check BHPLF's competition here
ERMAF vs RTNTF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while RTNTF trades at $116.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check RTNTF's competition here
ERMAF vs RTPPF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while RTPPF trades at $96.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check RTPPF's competition here
ERMAF vs GMBXF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while GMBXF trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check GMBXF's competition here
ERMAF vs GLNCY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while GLNCY trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -42.84. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check GLNCY's competition here
ERMAF vs GLCNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while GLCNF trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check GLCNF's competition here
ERMAF vs CMCLF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while CMCLF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check CMCLF's competition here
ERMAF vs NGLOY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while NGLOY trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check NGLOY's competition here
ERMAF vs AAUKF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AAUKF trades at $50.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -28.90. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AAUKF's competition here
ERMAF vs FSUMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while FSUMF trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check FSUMF's competition here
ERMAF vs FSUGY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while FSUGY trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check FSUGY's competition here
ERMAF vs TCKRF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while TCKRF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check TCKRF's competition here
ERMAF vs IPOAF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while IPOAF trades at $61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check IPOAF's competition here
ERMAF vs BDNNY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while BDNNY trades at $148.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check BDNNY's competition here
ERMAF vs SMMYY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while SMMYY trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 108.47. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check SMMYY's competition here
ERMAF vs IVPAF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while IVPAF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 52.59. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check IVPAF's competition here
ERMAF vs STMNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while STMNF trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 100.44. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check STMNF's competition here
ERMAF vs SHTLF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while SHTLF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check SHTLF's competition here
ERMAF vs SOUHY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while SOUHY trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check SOUHY's competition here
ERMAF vs LYSCF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while LYSCF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 1119.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check LYSCF's competition here
ERMAF vs LYSDY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while LYSDY trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 1105.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check LYSDY's competition here
ERMAF vs PILBF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PILBF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PILBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PILBF's competition here
ERMAF vs BOLIF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check BOLIF's competition here
ERMAF vs MALRY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MALRY trades at $38.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -11.16. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MALRY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MALRY's competition here
ERMAF vs PUTKY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PUTKY trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PUTKY's competition here
ERMAF vs ABML Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ABML's competition here
ERMAF vs MALRF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MALRF trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MALRF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MALRF's competition here
ERMAF vs PUTKF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PUTKF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PUTKF's competition here
ERMAF vs NGXXF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while NGXXF trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -54.85. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check NGXXF's competition here
ERMAF vs NILSY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check NILSY's competition here
ERMAF vs MIMTF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MIMTF trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MIMTF's competition here
ERMAF vs PTNDY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PTNDY trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 69.77. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PTNDY's competition here
ERMAF vs IPGDF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while IPGDF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check IPGDF's competition here
ERMAF vs IIDDY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while IIDDY trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check IIDDY's competition here
ERMAF vs PAEKY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PAEKY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PAEKY's competition here
ERMAF vs PTNDF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PTNDF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PTNDF's competition here
ERMAF vs LINRF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while LINRF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check LINRF's competition here
ERMAF vs NICMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while NICMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check NICMF's competition here
ERMAF vs FLMMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check FLMMF's competition here
ERMAF vs DWMNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while DWMNF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check DWMNF's competition here
ERMAF vs FMCXF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while FMCXF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -121.75. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check FMCXF's competition here
ERMAF vs AFBOF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AFBOF trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 123.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AFBOF's competition here
ERMAF vs AZZVF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AZZVF's competition here
ERMAF vs AUSDF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AUSDF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AUSDF's competition here
ERMAF vs ERMAY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ERMAY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ERMAY's competition here
ERMAF vs DETRF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while DETRF trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check DETRF's competition here
ERMAF vs ILKAY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ILKAY trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ILKAY's competition here
ERMAF vs ILKAF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ILKAF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is -7.98. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ILKAF's competition here
ERMAF vs PTTMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PTTMF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PTTMF's competition here
ERMAF vs ATUSF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ATUSF trades at $32.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ATUSF's competition here
ERMAF vs ADMLF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ADMLF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ADMLF's competition here
ERMAF vs ADTLF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ADTLF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ADTLF's competition here
ERMAF vs AMVMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AMVMF trades at $41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AMVMF's competition here
ERMAF vs AFMJF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AFMJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AFMJF's competition here
ERMAF vs TAOFF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while TAOFF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check TAOFF's competition here
ERMAF vs MCHHF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MCHHF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MCHHF's competition here
ERMAF vs SLGGF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while SLGGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check SLGGF's competition here
ERMAF vs AZRMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AZRMF's competition here
ERMAF vs MFRVF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MFRVF's competition here
ERMAF vs PXMFF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PXMFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PXMFF's competition here
ERMAF vs MJDLF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MJDLF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 87.60. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MJDLF's competition here
ERMAF vs STTSY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check STTSY's competition here
ERMAF vs TTNNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while TTNNF trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check TTNNF's competition here
ERMAF vs SYAXF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while SYAXF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to SYAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check SYAXF's competition here
ERMAF vs MNXMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 884.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MNXMF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -135.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MNXMF's competition here
ERMAF vs ALMTF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ALMTF's competition here
ERMAF vs NCKAF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 835.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while NCKAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check NCKAF's competition here
ERMAF vs MLXEF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 817.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MLXEF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MLXEF's competition here
ERMAF vs BIRNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check BIRNF's competition here
ERMAF vs VULNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 680M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while VULNF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check VULNF's competition here
ERMAF vs CHXMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 651.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while CHXMF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check CHXMF's competition here
ERMAF vs CGMLF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while CGMLF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check CGMLF's competition here
ERMAF vs GDQMF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while GDQMF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -172.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to GDQMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check GDQMF's competition here
ERMAF vs PMETF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 645.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PMETF trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -197.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PMETF's competition here
ERMAF vs BENZF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 628.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while BENZF trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -43.40. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check BENZF's competition here
ERMAF vs OSTTF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while OSTTF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check OSTTF's competition here
ERMAF vs FGOVF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 605.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while FGOVF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -106.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check FGOVF's competition here
ERMAF vs NTCPF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 563.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while NTCPF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -64.33. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check NTCPF's competition here
ERMAF vs UURAF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while UURAF trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check UURAF's competition here
ERMAF vs MRRDF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 548.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MRRDF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MRRDF's competition here
ERMAF vs MGMNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 542.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MGMNF trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 217.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MGMNF's competition here
ERMAF vs FWEDF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 535.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while FWEDF trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check FWEDF's competition here
ERMAF vs OMZNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 526.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while OMZNF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check OMZNF's competition here
ERMAF vs BQSSF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while BQSSF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check BQSSF's competition here
ERMAF vs ARAAF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ARAAF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ARAAF's competition here
ERMAF vs ECRAF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 478.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ECRAF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ECRAF's competition here
ERMAF vs MCRZF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check MCRZF's competition here
ERMAF vs TLOFF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 452.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while TLOFF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check TLOFF's competition here
ERMAF vs RGLSF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 439.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while RGLSF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -175.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check RGLSF's competition here
ERMAF vs PRMNF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 436.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while PRMNF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check PRMNF's competition here
ERMAF vs ERLFF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 430.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ERLFF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ERLFF's competition here
ERMAF vs JMXXF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 417.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while JMXXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check JMXXF's competition here
ERMAF vs CTJHY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while CTJHY trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check CTJHY's competition here
ERMAF vs RTRFF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while RTRFF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check RTRFF's competition here
ERMAF vs AUMTF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while AUMTF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check AUMTF's competition here
ERMAF vs ARAFF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 387.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ARAFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ARAFF's competition here
ERMAF vs ERDCF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while ERDCF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -39.73. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check ERDCF's competition here
ERMAF vs CXOXF Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while CXOXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is less volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check CXOXF's competition here
ERMAF vs NQMIY Comparison February 2026
ERMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERMAF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERMAF is priced at $54.52, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERMAF currently has a P/E ratio of -13.63, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, ERMAF's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ERMAF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERMAF.Check NQMIY's competition here