Candente Copper Corp.
Candente Copper Corp. (DNT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DNT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNT.TO | CA$0.13 | +0.00% | 38.8M | -13.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| FM.TO | CA$22.95 | -1.67% | 19B | 65.57 | CA$0.35 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | CA$14.16 | -1.73% | 12.1B | 83.29 | CA$0.17 | +2.29% |
| CS.TO | CA$8.71 | +2.23% | 6.6B | 62.21 | CA$0.14 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | CA$12.63 | -0.55% | 5B | 23.39 | CA$0.54 | +0.16% |
| ERO.TO | CA$18.63 | -2.92% | 1.9B | 9.81 | CA$1.90 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$13.20 | -1.27% | 1.8B | -11.28 | -CA$1.17 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$4.17 | -1.42% | 1.3B | -19.86 | -CA$0.21 | N/A |
| MARI.TO | CA$9.90 | -0.50% | 1.1B | -55.00 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| AYM.TO | CA$5.78 | +8.85% | 835.8M | 10.70 | CA$0.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DNT.TO vs FM.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while FM.TO trades at CA$22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 65.57. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check FM.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while LUN.TO trades at CA$14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 83.29. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check LUN.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs CS.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while CS.TO trades at CA$8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 62.21. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while HBM.TO trades at CA$12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while ERO.TO trades at CA$18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check ERO.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs IE.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while IE.TO trades at CA$13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while TKO.TO trades at CA$4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -19.86. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while MARI.TO trades at CA$9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO and AYM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AYM.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs III.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 650.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while III.TO trades at CA$3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check III.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 412.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -33.14. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while ARG.TO trades at CA$2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while FDY.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check FDY.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
DNT.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO and CCI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCI.CN's competition here
DNT.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. DNT.TO has daily volatility of 0.00 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
DNT.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704.7K. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO and AFX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFX.CN's competition here
DNT.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO and JUBA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JUBA.CN's competition here
DNT.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison August 2025
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.8M. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at CA$0.13, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here