Candente Copper Corp.
Candente Copper Corp. DNT.TO Peers
See (DNT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNT.TO | $0.13 | N/A | 38.81M | -13.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| FM.TO | $19.53 | -2.79% | 16.17B | 78.12 | $0.25 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | $12.31 | -2.30% | 10.68B | 72.41 | $0.17 | +3.15% |
| CS.TO | $6.60 | -3.37% | 5.03B | -33.00 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | $11.34 | -2.66% | 4.48B | 21.00 | $0.54 | +0.18% |
| ERO.TO | $18.31 | -3.83% | 1.90B | 73.24 | $0.25 | N/A |
| IE.TO | $9.54 | -0.21% | 1.26B | -8.08 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | $2.80 | -0.71% | 884.45M | -13.33 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| AYM.TO | $5.78 | +8.85% | 835.77M | 10.70 | $0.54 | N/A |
| III.TO | $3.67 | -2.65% | 594.37M | 3.82 | $0.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DNT.TO vs FM.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 16.17B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while FM.TO trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 78.12. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 10.68B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while LUN.TO trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 72.41. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs CS.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while CS.TO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while HBM.TO trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while ERO.TO trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 73.24. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs IE.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while IE.TO trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 884.45M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while TKO.TO trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.77M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while AYM.TO trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO and AYM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DNT.TO vs III.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 594.37M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while III.TO trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.81M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while CMMC.TO trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 474.48M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while MARI.TO trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -23.45. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 285.40M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while ASCU.TO trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 284.37M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while ARG.TO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 156.19M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while FDY.TO trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.89M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while NCU.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while RCLF.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. DNT.TO has daily volatility of 0.00 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
DNT.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 16.00M. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while CCI.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DNT.TO.
DNT.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704674.00. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while AFX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO and AFX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DNT.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison
DNT.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DNT.TO stands at 38.81M. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, DNT.TO is priced at $0.13, while JUBA.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DNT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, DNT.TO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DNT.TO and JUBA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).