Doubleview Gold Corp.
Doubleview Gold Corp. (DBLVF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DBLVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBLVF | $0.37 | +3.08% | 78.8M | -37.32 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.14 | -5.86% | 127.9B | 11.25 | $2.24 | +4.92% |
| RTPPF | $59.96 | +0.15% | 101.9B | 9.55 | $6.28 | +6.70% |
| RTNTF | $71.00 | -4.97% | 100.3B | 11.31 | $6.28 | +3.31% |
| GMBXF | $6.43 | -0.92% | 50B | 12.84 | $0.50 | +3.75% |
| GLCNF | $3.82 | -4.02% | 47.6B | -30.85 | -$0.13 | +2.85% |
| GLNCY | $7.60 | -4.10% | 47.5B | -30.69 | -$0.26 | +2.69% |
| FSUGY | $24.13 | +1.11% | 36.6B | 9.42 | $2.53 | +7.64% |
| FSUMF | $11.40 | -5.08% | 35B | 9.05 | $1.26 | +7.76% |
| NGLOY | $14.14 | +2.69% | 29.9B | -9.62 | -$1.44 | +2.29% |
Stock Comparison
DBLVF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while BHPLF trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and BHPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHPLF's competition here
DBLVF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while RTPPF trades at $59.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
DBLVF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while RTNTF trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTNTF's competition here
DBLVF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while GMBXF trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check GMBXF's competition here
DBLVF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while GLCNF trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.85. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check GLCNF's competition here
DBLVF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while GLNCY trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.69. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check GLNCY's competition here
DBLVF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while FSUGY trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check FSUGY's competition here
DBLVF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while FSUMF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check FSUMF's competition here
DBLVF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while NGLOY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check NGLOY's competition here
DBLVF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while AAUKF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and AAUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAUKF's competition here
DBLVF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while CMCLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and CMCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMCLF's competition here
DBLVF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while TCKRF trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 100.76. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check TCKRF's competition here
DBLVF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while IVPAF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check IVPAF's competition here
DBLVF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while IPOAF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check IPOAF's competition here
DBLVF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
DBLVF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while SHTLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
DBLVF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while BDNNY trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and BDNNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDNNY's competition here
DBLVF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check JXMNF's competition here
DBLVF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while LYSDY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 259.00. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check LYSDY's competition here
DBLVF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while LYSCF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 257.33. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check LYSCF's competition here
DBLVF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ABML's competition here
DBLVF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while SMMYY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.70. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and SMMYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMMYY's competition here
DBLVF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
DBLVF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PUTKY trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PUTKY's competition here
DBLVF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
DBLVF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
DBLVF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
DBLVF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MALRY trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and MALRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRY's competition here
DBLVF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PILBF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -110.60. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PILBF's competition here
DBLVF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MALRF trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
DBLVF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while NGXXF trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -52.41. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check NGXXF's competition here
DBLVF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check FLMMF's competition here
DBLVF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check IIDDY's competition here
DBLVF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
DBLVF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
DBLVF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PTNDY's competition here
DBLVF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MIMTF's competition here
DBLVF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check NICMF's competition here
DBLVF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check DWMNF's competition here
DBLVF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
DBLVF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check AFBOF's competition here
DBLVF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -16.51. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ERMAF's competition here
DBLVF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while SOUHY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.54. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check SOUHY's competition here
DBLVF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ILKAF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ILKAF's competition here
DBLVF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PTNDF's competition here
DBLVF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ILKAY trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILKAY's competition here
DBLVF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ERMAY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAY's competition here
DBLVF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while DETRF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETRF's competition here
DBLVF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check TAOFF's competition here
DBLVF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ADTLF's competition here
DBLVF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ADMLF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ADMLF's competition here
DBLVF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while LINRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -47.61. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and LINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LINRF's competition here
DBLVF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
DBLVF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MFRVF's competition here
DBLVF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 987.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ATUSF trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ATUSF's competition here
DBLVF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 971.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while FMCXF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check FMCXF's competition here
DBLVF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check STTSY's competition here
DBLVF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check AUSDF's competition here
DBLVF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 886.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while AMVMF trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 85.87. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check AMVMF's competition here
DBLVF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ALMTF's competition here
DBLVF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 847.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while AFMJF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check AFMJF's competition here
DBLVF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check CTJHF's competition here
DBLVF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 586.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while VULNF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check VULNF's competition here
DBLVF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check NCKAF's competition here
DBLVF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 538.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MJDLF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MJDLF's competition here
DBLVF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 533M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while CREQF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and CREQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CREQF's competition here
DBLVF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 516.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while REEMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check REEMF's competition here
DBLVF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 510.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while FGOVF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -96.54. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check FGOVF's competition here
DBLVF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check TTNNF's competition here
DBLVF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PTTMF's competition here
DBLVF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check OSTTF's competition here
DBLVF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 487.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while SLGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and SLGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLGGF's competition here
DBLVF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MCRZF's competition here
DBLVF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while BQSSF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check BQSSF's competition here
DBLVF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 452.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PMETF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -92.98. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PMETF's competition here
DBLVF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 451.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MNXMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.13. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MNXMF's competition here
DBLVF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check BIRNF's competition here
DBLVF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while KMRPF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and KMRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMRPF's competition here
DBLVF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
DBLVF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MLYF's competition here
DBLVF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while FWEDF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check FWEDF's competition here
DBLVF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check CTJHY's competition here
DBLVF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PXMFF's competition here
DBLVF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MCHHF's competition here
DBLVF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MLXEF's competition here
DBLVF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 325.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -31.40. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check ERLFF's competition here
DBLVF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 311.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.03. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check SVMLF's competition here
DBLVF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
DBLVF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 303.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while CGMLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check CGMLF's competition here
DBLVF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and RTLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTLGF's competition here
DBLVF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 296.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while PRMNF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check PRMNF's competition here
DBLVF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 296.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and ARAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARAFF's competition here
DBLVF vs MMILF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MMILF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MMILF's competition here
DBLVF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while SRHYY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check SRHYY's competition here
DBLVF vs MLYCF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MLYCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MLYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MLYCF's competition here
DBLVF vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 263.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while MGMNF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check MGMNF's competition here
DBLVF vs LRSRF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check LRSRF's competition here
DBLVF vs NTCPF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while NTCPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -32.89. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBLVF.Check NTCPF's competition here
DBLVF vs STQNF Comparison August 2025
DBLVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBLVF stands at 78.8M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBLVF is priced at $0.37, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBLVF currently has a P/E ratio of -37.32, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, DBLVF's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DBLVF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STQNF's competition here