CoreCivic, Inc.
CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CXW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXW | $18.66 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 15.48 | $1.08 | N/A |
| EQIX | $918.03 | +0.00% | 91.2B | 67.25 | $13.80 | +2.03% |
| AMT | $184.79 | +0.00% | 87.7B | 29.93 | $6.26 | +3.63% |
| CCI | $86.47 | +0.00% | 38.3B | 34.91 | $2.52 | +5.40% |
| IRM | $108.15 | +0.00% | 32.6B | 225.10 | $0.49 | +2.95% |
| SBAC | $198.29 | +0.00% | 21.3B | 24.97 | $7.99 | +2.23% |
| WY | $25.55 | +0.02% | 18.2B | 56.18 | $0.45 | +3.35% |
| LAMR | $132.83 | +0.00% | 13.6B | 31.52 | $4.25 | +4.81% |
| GLPI | $47.35 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 16.94 | $2.79 | +6.57% |
| EPR | $57.31 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 25.31 | $2.28 | +6.12% |
Stock Comparison
CXW vs EQIX Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while EQIX trades at $918.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check EQIX's competition here
CXW vs AMT Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while AMT trades at $184.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check AMT's competition here
CXW vs CCI Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while CCI trades at $86.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check CCI's competition here
CXW vs IRM Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while IRM trades at $108.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 225.10. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check IRM's competition here
CXW vs SBAC Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while SBAC trades at $198.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check SBAC's competition here
CXW vs WY Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while WY trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 56.18. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check WY's competition here
CXW vs LAMR Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while LAMR trades at $132.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check LAMR's competition here
CXW vs GLPI Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while GLPI trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check GLPI's competition here
CXW vs EPR Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while EPR trades at $57.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check EPR's competition here
CXW vs OUT Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while OUT trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check OUT's competition here
CXW vs RYN Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while RYN trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check RYN's competition here
CXW vs TIPRX Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TIPRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while TIPRX trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas TIPRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIPRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to TIPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check TIPRX's competition here
CXW vs PCH Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while PCH trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check PCH's competition here
CXW vs EPR-PE Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while EPR-PE trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check EPR-PE's competition here
CXW vs UNIT Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while UNIT trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check UNIT's competition here
CXW vs EPR-PC Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while EPR-PC trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check EPR-PC's competition here
CXW vs EPR-PG Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while EPR-PG trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check EPR-PG's competition here
CXW vs SMA Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while SMA trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas SMA's P/E ratio is 232.40. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to SMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check SMA's competition here
CXW vs LANDP Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 714.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while LANDP trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LANDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check LANDP's competition here
CXW vs FPI Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while FPI trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check FPI's competition here
CXW vs KRSOX Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KRSOX has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while KRSOX trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas KRSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is more volatile compared to KRSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check KRSOX's competition here
CXW vs AFCG Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while AFCG trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFCG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check AFCG's competition here
CXW vs PW Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while PW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check PW's competition here
CXW vs CTT Comparison February 2026
CXW plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXW stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CXW is priced at $18.66, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXW currently has a P/E ratio of 15.48, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, CXW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CXW is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXW.Check CTT's competition here