Calibre Mining Corp.
Calibre Mining Corp. (CXB.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CXB.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXB.TO | CA$2.99 | -0.33% | 2.6B | 29.90 | CA$0.10 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$88.12 | +0.78% | 96.8B | 12.10 | CA$7.28 | +1.59% |
| AEM.TO | CA$173.83 | +2.26% | 87.9B | 27.00 | CA$6.44 | +1.29% |
| WPM.TO | CA$128.60 | +2.08% | 58.4B | 69.14 | CA$1.86 | +0.70% |
| ABX.TO | CA$29.62 | +0.78% | 50.9B | 16.36 | CA$1.81 | +2.40% |
| FNV.TO | CA$223.60 | +1.39% | 43.1B | 51.78 | CA$4.32 | +0.92% |
| K.TO | CA$22.06 | +2.37% | 27.1B | 16.59 | CA$1.33 | +0.76% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$65.54 | +2.89% | 15.8B | 21.69 | CA$3.02 | +3.34% |
| AGI.TO | CA$35.42 | +1.84% | 14.9B | 41.67 | CA$0.85 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
CXB.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NGT.TO trades at CA$88.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NGT.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while AEM.TO trades at CA$173.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check AEM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while WPM.TO trades at CA$128.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 69.14. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check WPM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ABX.TO trades at CA$29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ABX.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while FNV.TO trades at CA$223.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 51.78. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check FNV.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs K.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while K.TO trades at CA$22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check K.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NCM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while LUG.TO trades at CA$65.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check LUG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while AGI.TO trades at CA$35.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check AGI.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while EDV.TO trades at CA$42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -73.80. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check EDV.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check YRI.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs OR.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while OR.TO trades at CA$38.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 166.74. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check OR.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while EQX.TO trades at CA$8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check EQX.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while BTO.TO trades at CA$4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check BTO.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ELD.TO trades at CA$28.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ELD.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while IMG.TO trades at CA$9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check IMG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NGD.TO trades at CA$5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NGD.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while OGC.TO trades at CA$19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check OGC.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while OLA.TO trades at CA$13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check OLA.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check PRU.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while DPM.TO trades at CA$23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check DPM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SSL.TO trades at CA$12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 92.79. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SSL.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check KNT.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while TXG.TO trades at CA$40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check TXG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check CEE.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs NG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NG.TO trades at CA$7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -20.63. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ORA.TO trades at CA$33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -18.98. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ORA.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while WDO.TO trades at CA$17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check WDO.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check WGX.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SEA.TO trades at CA$21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -145.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SEA.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs CG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 39.12. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check CG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check OSK.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO and SBB.TO have similar daily volatility (2.34).Check SBB.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check KRR.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while RUP.TO trades at CA$4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -163.67. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check RUP.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while CNL.TO trades at CA$12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check CNL.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 821.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ASE.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 770.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check MSA.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 667.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -69.25. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs AR.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check AR.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 649.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check IAU.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 590.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ORE.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 491.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while GAU.TO trades at CA$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -21.22. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check GAU.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs MND.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check MND.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 459M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check PRB.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SGD.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs FDR.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check FDR.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -51.67. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ITH.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 306.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -35.09. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check JAG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check STGO.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SBI.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check DNG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs FF.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check FF.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check LGD.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs G.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while G.TO trades at CA$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check G.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check BSX.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check TNX.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ELO.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs LN.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check LN.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs COG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check COG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NEXG.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check STLR.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SANU.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs CBR.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check CBR.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check MAW.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check XTG.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check GHRT.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check CCM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SIG.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check VEIN.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs HMR.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check HMR.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs CGC.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check CGC.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs TML.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check TML.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ESM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check USGD.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs ME.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check ME.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NOM.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NHK.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check BNN.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check AMM.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check NVO.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs VLC.V Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check VLC.V's competition here
CXB.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check GRC.TO's competition here
CXB.TO vs QIM.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check QIM.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check HWG.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs IRV.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check IRV.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs MLM.NE Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MLM.NE has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while MLM.NE trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas MLM.NE's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLM.NE's ROE of +18.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to MLM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check MLM.NE's competition here
CXB.TO vs RISE.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check RISE.CN's competition here
CXB.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison July 2025
CXB.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXB.TO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXB.TO is priced at CA$2.99, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXB.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 29.90, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, CXB.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CXB.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXB.TO.Check CTOC.CN's competition here