Centerspace
Centerspace (CSR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSR | $62.05 | -1.66% | 1B | 60.67 | $1.02 | +4.97% |
| AVB | $170.66 | -0.23% | 23.9B | 22.81 | $7.41 | +4.11% |
| EQR | $60.33 | +0.10% | 22.7B | 20.41 | $2.94 | +4.61% |
| SUI | $134.54 | -0.34% | 16.6B | -220.38 | -$0.61 | +5.96% |
| ESS | $250.55 | -0.33% | 16.1B | 24.01 | $10.41 | +4.11% |
| MAA-PI | $53.82 | -1.45% | 15.9B | 10.46 | $5.15 | +4.79% |
| INVH | $25.26 | +0.58% | 15.3B | 26.01 | $0.96 | +4.67% |
| MAA | $127.05 | -0.55% | 14.8B | 33.51 | $3.77 | +4.79% |
| ELS | $68.34 | +0.63% | 13.2B | 33.78 | $2.01 | +3.03% |
| AMH-PH | $23.32 | -0.82% | 12.6B | 48.37 | $0.48 | +4.31% |
Stock Comparison
CSR vs AVB Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AVB trades at $170.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AVB's competition here
CSR vs EQR Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while EQR trades at $60.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check EQR's competition here
CSR vs SUI Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while SUI trades at $134.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is -220.38. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check SUI's competition here
CSR vs ESS Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, ESS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while ESS trades at $250.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas ESS's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ESS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to ESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check ESS's competition here
CSR vs MAA-PI Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while MAA-PI trades at $53.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check MAA-PI's competition here
CSR vs INVH Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while INVH trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check INVH's competition here
CSR vs MAA Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while MAA trades at $127.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check MAA's competition here
CSR vs ELS Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while ELS trades at $68.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check ELS's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PH Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AMH-PH trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PH's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PG Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AMH-PG trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 46.60. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PG's competition here
CSR vs UDR Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while UDR trades at $35.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UDR's competition here
CSR vs CPT Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while CPT trades at $101.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check CPT's competition here
CSR vs AMH Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AMH trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH's competition here
CSR vs AIRC Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AIRC's competition here
CSR vs MRP Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while MRP trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check MRP's competition here
CSR vs IRT Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, IRT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while IRT trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas IRT's P/E ratio is 65.90. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IRT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to IRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check IRT's competition here
CSR vs VRE Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while VRE trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check VRE's competition here
CSR vs UMH-PD Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while UMH-PD trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 112.59. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UMH-PD's competition here
CSR vs UMH Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while UMH trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 209.36. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UMH's competition here
CSR vs CSR-PC Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check CSR-PC's competition here
CSR vs NXRT Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 652.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while NXRT trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check NXRT's competition here
CSR vs AIV Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 606.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AIV trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIV's ROE of +3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AIV's competition here
CSR vs BRT Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 271.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while BRT trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -27.98. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRT's competition here
CSR vs SUNS Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while SUNS trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check SUNS's competition here
CSR vs CLPR Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while CLPR trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check CLPR's competition here
CSR vs BHM Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while BHM trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BHM's competition here
CSR vs ACC Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while ACC trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check ACC's competition here
CSR vs BRG Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while BRG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRG's competition here
CSR vs UMH-PC Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UMH-PC's competition here
CSR vs BRG-PC Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRG-PC's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PF Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PF's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PE Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PE's competition here
CSR vs BRG-PD Comparison March 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1B. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $62.05, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 60.67, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRG-PD's competition here