Cosan S.A.
Cosan S.A. (CSAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSAN | $4.94 | +0.00% | 2.4B | -0.92 | -$5.51 | N/A |
| PSX | $155.41 | +0.00% | 62.8B | 14.42 | $10.80 | +3.04% |
| VLO | $199.24 | -0.00% | 62.4B | 26.49 | $7.58 | +2.28% |
| MPC | $196.47 | +0.00% | 59.1B | 14.88 | $13.22 | +1.94% |
| APC | $19.23 | +0.00% | 11.5B | 27.44 | $0.70 | N/A |
| DINO | $50.48 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 24.11 | $2.11 | +3.89% |
| SUN | $62.06 | +0.00% | 8.5B | 22.25 | $2.81 | +5.85% |
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | N/A |
| UGP | $5.23 | +0.00% | 5.7B | 10.49 | $0.51 | +5.56% |
| VVV | $38.68 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 56.12 | $0.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSAN vs PSX Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while PSX trades at $155.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PSX's competition here
CSAN vs VLO Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while VLO trades at $199.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VLO's competition here
CSAN vs MPC Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while MPC trades at $196.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check MPC's competition here
CSAN vs APC Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while APC trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to APC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check APC's competition here
CSAN vs DINO Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while DINO trades at $50.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check DINO's competition here
CSAN vs SUN Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while SUN trades at $62.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SUN's competition here
CSAN vs HFC Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HFC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while HFC trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas HFC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to HFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to HFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check HFC's competition here
CSAN vs UGP Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while UGP trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check UGP's competition here
CSAN vs VVV Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while VVV trades at $38.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 56.12. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VVV's competition here
CSAN vs PBF Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PBF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while PBF trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas PBF's P/E ratio is -24.73. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to PBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to PBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PBF's competition here
CSAN vs REGI Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check REGI's competition here
CSAN vs PARR Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while PARR trades at $42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PARR's competition here
CSAN vs CVI Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while CVI trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CVI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CVI's competition here
CSAN vs DK Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while DK trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas DK's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to DK's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check DK's competition here
CSAN vs INT Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check INT's competition here
CSAN vs WKC Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while WKC trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check WKC's competition here
CSAN vs CAPL Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 802.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while CAPL trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CAPL's competition here
CSAN vs CLNE Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 572.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while CLNE trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CLNE's competition here
CSAN vs SGU Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while SGU trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SGU's competition here
CSAN vs AE Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check AE's competition here
CSAN vs AMTX Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while AMTX trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check AMTX's competition here
CSAN vs TMDE Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while TMDE trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check TMDE's competition here
CSAN vs BPT Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check BPT's competition here
CSAN vs VTNR Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VTNR's competition here
CSAN vs SHI Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SHI's competition here
CSAN vs NTI Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check NTI's competition here
CSAN vs SRLP Comparison February 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $4.94, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.92, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SRLP's competition here