Criteo S.A.
Criteo S.A. CRTO Peers
See (CRTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTO | $24.14 | +1.36% | 1.3B | 9.77 | $2.44 | N/A |
| OMC | $71.65 | +0.59% | 13.9B | 9.74 | $7.32 | +3.94% |
| IPG | $24.39 | +0.60% | 9B | 18.52 | $1.31 | +5.46% |
| WPP | $35.10 | +1.01% | 7.6B | 10.49 | $3.35 | +7.10% |
| MGNI | $24.06 | +14.74% | 3B | 95.91 | $0.22 | N/A |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| IAS | $8.30 | +2.53% | 1.3B | 27.72 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZD | $30.22 | -3.48% | 1.3B | 17.39 | $1.75 | N/A |
| STGW | $4.53 | +1.00% | 1.2B | -447.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CMPR | $46.37 | -0.86% | 1.2B | 8.03 | $5.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRTO vs OMC Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while OMC trades at $71.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs IPG Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while IPG trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs WPP Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while WPP trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MGNI Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MGNI trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 95.91. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MDCA Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs IAS Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while IAS trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ZD Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ZD trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs STGW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while STGW trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -447.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs CMPR Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while CMPR trades at $46.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs EEX Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while EEX trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 493.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs QNST Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 896.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while QNST trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1574.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs BOMN Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs DLX Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 710M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while DLX trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs CCO Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 598.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while CCO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs CTV Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs NCMI Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 461.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while NCMI trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -25.74. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs BOC Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while BOC trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 468.33. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ADV Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ADV trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs QUOT Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs TRMR Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs NEXN Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 331.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while NEXN trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ADTH Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs SDM Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while SDM trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 133.67. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs EDHL Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while EDHL trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 619.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs TZOO Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 148.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while TZOO trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs WIMI Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while WIMI trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs TSQ Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while TSQ trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MCHX Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MCHX trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -16.54. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ATY Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs CDLX Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while CDLX trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ICLK Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs STCN Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs INUV Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while INUV trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs XNET Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while XNET trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XNET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ABLV Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ABLV trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MCTR Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MCTR trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 153.50. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ACCS Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ACCS trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ADTHW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs FLNT Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while FLNT trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs GSMG Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MOXC Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MOBQ Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MOBQ trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs HHS Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while HHS trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs SWAG Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while SWAG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs HAO Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while HAO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs STRN Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs QMMM Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while QMMM trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs CHR Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while CHR trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs TNMG Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while TNMG trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ISIG Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs STFS Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while STFS trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs VSME Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while VSME trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs DRCT Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while DRCT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs LDWY Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while LDWY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs DMS Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs DRCTW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs BAOS Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while BAOS trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ADVWW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MGOL Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs CNET Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while CNET trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs STRNW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs SRAX Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 653.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while SRAX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs TRKAW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ABLVW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 407K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs SWAGW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 256.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while SWAGW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs MOBQW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 29.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs GSMGW Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs ZDVSV Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs DMS-WT Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.
CRTO vs TRKA Comparison
CRTO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO is priced at $24.14, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.77, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRTO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.