Crestview Exploration Inc.
Crestview Exploration Inc. (CRS.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRS.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRS.CN | CA$0.03 | +25.00% | 921.3K | -1.25 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$97.79 | +0.37% | 107.4B | 12.83 | CA$7.62 | +1.43% |
| AEM.TO | CA$189.83 | +0.13% | 95.4B | 23.29 | CA$8.15 | +1.18% |
| ABX.TO | CA$36.25 | +2.08% | 62.3B | 16.48 | CA$2.20 | +1.97% |
| WPM.TO | CA$132.16 | +0.72% | 60B | 55.07 | CA$2.40 | +0.69% |
| FNV.TO | CA$255.86 | +1.24% | 49.3B | 45.53 | CA$5.62 | +0.81% |
| K.TO | CA$27.10 | -0.15% | 33B | 15.76 | CA$1.72 | +0.62% |
| LUG.TO | CA$79.54 | +0.68% | 19.2B | 22.60 | CA$3.52 | +2.75% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| AGI.TO | CA$39.27 | +1.63% | 16.5B | 34.45 | CA$1.14 | +0.36% |
Stock Comparison
CRS.CN vs NGT.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NGT.TO trades at CA$97.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check NGT.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs AEM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AEM.TO trades at CA$189.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check AEM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs ABX.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ABX.TO trades at CA$36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ABX.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs WPM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WPM.TO trades at CA$132.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 55.07. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check WPM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs FNV.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while FNV.TO trades at CA$255.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 45.53. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check FNV.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs K.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while K.TO trades at CA$27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check K.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs LUG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while LUG.TO trades at CA$79.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check LUG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs NCM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check NCM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs AGI.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AGI.TO trades at CA$39.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check AGI.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs EDV.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while EDV.TO trades at CA$47.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check EDV.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs EQX.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while EQX.TO trades at CA$11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is -61.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check EQX.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs OR.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OR.TO trades at CA$42.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 73.64. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check OR.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs YRI.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check YRI.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs BTO.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check BTO.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs IMG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while IMG.TO trades at CA$12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check IMG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs ELD.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ELD.TO trades at CA$32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ELD.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs NGD.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NGD.TO trades at CA$7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check NGD.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs OGC.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OGC.TO trades at CA$23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check OGC.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SSRM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs OLA.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 144.40. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check OLA.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs PRU.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check PRU.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SSL.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SSL.TO trades at CA$15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 89.18. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check SSL.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs DPM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while DPM.TO trades at CA$25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check DPM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs TXG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while TXG.TO trades at CA$42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check TXG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs KNT.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while KNT.TO trades at CA$15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check KNT.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs NG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NG.TO trades at CA$8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check NG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs ORA.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ORA.TO trades at CA$38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -34.11. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ORA.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs CEE.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and CEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEE.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs WGX.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check WGX.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs WDO.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WDO.TO trades at CA$17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check WDO.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs CXB.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check CXB.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SEA.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SEA.TO trades at CA$22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check SEA.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs CG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CG.TO trades at CA$10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check CG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs AAUC.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs OSK.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check OSK.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs CNL.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CNL.TO trades at CA$15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -23.12. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check CNL.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs RUP.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -171.67. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check RUP.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SBB.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check SBB.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs KRR.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check KRR.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs MSA.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 920.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MSA.TO trades at CA$3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check MSA.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs IAU.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 855.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while IAU.TO trades at CA$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check IAU.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs ASE.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -25.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ASE.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs GTWO.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 757.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -78.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs GAU.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 754.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -73.25. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check GAU.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs ORE.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 723.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ORE.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs AR.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check AR.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs MND.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 483.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check MND.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs PRB.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 483.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -21.55. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check PRB.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SGD.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and SGD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGD.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs ITH.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -64.33. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ITH.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs MOZ.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs FDR.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 377.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -61.67. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check FDR.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs STGO.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check STGO.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs JAG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while JAG.TO trades at CA$4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check JAG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SBI.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SBI.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check SBI.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs GOLD.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 234.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs FF.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 230.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check FF.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs DNG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check DNG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs VGZ.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs LGD.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check LGD.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs LN.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check LN.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs G.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while G.TO trades at CA$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check G.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs TNX.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check TNX.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs NEXG.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check NEXG.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs BSX.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 115.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check BSX.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs COG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check COG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs CBR.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check CBR.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs ELO.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ELO.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs STLR.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check STLR.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs XTG.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.83. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check XTG.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs GHRT.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check GHRT.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs MAW.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check MAW.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SANU.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and SANU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SANU.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs CCM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check CCM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs ESM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 89M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ESM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs BLLG.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs SIG.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check SIG.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs CGC.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -31.75. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check CGC.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs TML.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and TML.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TML.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs HMR.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check HMR.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs VEIN.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and VEIN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VEIN.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs ME.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check ME.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs GTCH.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs NOM.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check NOM.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs USGD.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check USGD.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs NHK.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check NHK.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs BNN.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check BNN.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs AUOZ.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs VLC.V Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and VLC.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLC.V's competition here
CRS.CN vs AMM.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check AMM.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs NVO.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and NVO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVO.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs VGCX.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs SGNL.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs QIM.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check QIM.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs MLM.NE Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, MLM.NE has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while MLM.NE trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas MLM.NE's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to MLM.NE's ROE of +31.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to MLM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check MLM.NE's competition here
CRS.CN vs GRC.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN and GRC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRC.TO's competition here
CRS.CN vs HWG.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check HWG.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs WG.CN Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check WG.CN's competition here
CRS.CN vs YRB.TO Comparison August 2025
CRS.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRS.CN stands at 921.3K. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRS.CN is priced at CA$0.03, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRS.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.25, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, CRS.CN's ROE is -1.20%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRS.CN is less volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRS.CN.Check YRB.TO's competition here