Core Natural Resources, Inc.
Core Natural Resources, Inc. (CNR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNR | $98.89 | -1.15% | 5.1B | -33.19 | -$2.98 | +0.41% |
| HCC | $85.12 | -0.26% | 4.5B | 75.36 | $1.13 | +0.38% |
| BTU | $34.64 | -3.59% | 4.2B | -80.60 | -$0.43 | +0.87% |
| ARLP | $27.28 | -0.66% | 3.5B | 11.32 | $2.41 | +9.17% |
| CEIX | $84.16 | +0.39% | 2.5B | 6.22 | $13.54 | +0.48% |
| ARCH | $134.83 | +0.70% | 2.4B | 14.06 | $9.59 | N/A |
| AMR | $187.86 | -0.85% | 2.4B | -39.46 | -$4.75 | N/A |
| NRP | $118.08 | -1.11% | 1.6B | 11.73 | $10.04 | +2.65% |
| METCL | $25.26 | +0.16% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +0.48% |
| METCB | $10.43 | -10.16% | 877.6M | -10.54 | -$0.99 | +7.27% |
Stock Comparison
CNR vs HCC Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while HCC trades at $85.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 75.36. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check HCC's competition here
CNR vs BTU Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BTU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while BTU trades at $34.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas BTU's P/E ratio is -80.60. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BTU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to BTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check BTU's competition here
CNR vs ARLP Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while ARLP trades at $27.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check ARLP's competition here
CNR vs CEIX Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while CEIX trades at $84.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CEIX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check CEIX's competition here
CNR vs ARCH Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while ARCH trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check ARCH's competition here
CNR vs AMR Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while AMR trades at $187.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is -39.46. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check AMR's competition here
CNR vs NRP Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while NRP trades at $118.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check NRP's competition here
CNR vs METCL Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while METCL trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to METCL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check METCL's competition here
CNR vs METCB Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 877.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while METCB trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to METCB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check METCB's competition here
CNR vs METC Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 817.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while METC trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas METC's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to METC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check METC's competition here
CNR vs HNRG Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 796.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while HNRG trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HNRG's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check HNRG's competition here
CNR vs SXC Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while SXC trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SXC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check SXC's competition here
CNR vs NC Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while NC trades at $51.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check NC's competition here
CNR vs AREC Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while AREC trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AREC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check AREC's competition here
CNR vs AHGP Comparison March 2026
CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $98.89, while AHGP trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNR currently has a P/E ratio of -33.19, whereas AHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AHGP's ROE of -11.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to AHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.Check AHGP's competition here