Core Natural Resources, Inc.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CUAEF has a market cap of 104.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CUAEF trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CUAEF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CUAEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CUAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CSUAY has a market cap of 103.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CSUAY trades at $15.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CSUAY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CSUAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CSUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CCOZF has a market cap of 18.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CCOZF trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CCOZF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCOZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to CCOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, YZCAY has a market cap of 14.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while YZCAY trades at $10.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas YZCAY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YZCAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to YZCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, YZCHF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while YZCHF trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas YZCHF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YZCHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to YZCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, IMYCF has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while IMYCF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas IMYCF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to IMYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, YACAF has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while YACAF trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas YACAF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YACAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to YACAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, HIIDQ has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while HIIDQ trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas HIIDQ's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HIIDQ's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to HIIDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, PADEF has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while PADEF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas PADEF's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PADEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to PADEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, ADOOY has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while ADOOY trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ADOOY's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADOOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to ADOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, ARLP has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while ARLP trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ARLP's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to ARLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, WHITF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while WHITF trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas WHITF's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WHITF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to WHITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CEIX has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CEIX trades at $84.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CEIX's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEIX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, PBMRF has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while PBMRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas PBMRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBMRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to PBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, ARCH has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while ARCH trades at $134.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ARCH's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARCH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to ARCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, HCC has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while HCC trades at $45.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas HCC's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to HCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, PBATF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while PBATF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas PBATF's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBATF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to PBATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, NHPEF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while NHPEF trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas NHPEF's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NHPEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to NHPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, PBMRY has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while PBMRY trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas PBMRY's P/E ratio is -53.50. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBMRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to PBMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, EXXAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while EXXAF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas EXXAF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXXAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to EXXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, PTIZF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while PTIZF trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas PTIZF's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTIZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to PTIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, BTU has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while BTU trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BTU's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to BTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, FSHYF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while FSHYF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FSHYF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSHYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to FSHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, AMR has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while AMR trades at $113.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas AMR's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to AMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, ITAYY has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while ITAYY trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ITAYY's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITAYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to ITAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, NRP has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while NRP trades at $95.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas NRP's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to NRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, STMRF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while STMRF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas STMRF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STMRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to STMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CCOZY has a market cap of 865.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CCOZY trades at $22.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CCOZY's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCOZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to CCOZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, MOGLF has a market cap of 848.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while MOGLF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas MOGLF's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOGLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to MOGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, BNPJY has a market cap of 801.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while BNPJY trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BNPJY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNPJY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to BNPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, SXC has a market cap of 722.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while SXC trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas SXC's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SXC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to SXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, TNGRF has a market cap of 667.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while TNGRF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas TNGRF's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TNGRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to TNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, HNRG has a market cap of 657.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while HNRG trades at $15.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas HNRG's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HNRG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to HNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, METCB has a market cap of 532.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while METCB trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas METCB's P/E ratio is 80.20. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to METCB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to METCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, METCL has a market cap of 519.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while METCL trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas METCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to METCL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to METCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, METC has a market cap of 480.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while METC trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas METC's P/E ratio is 81.73. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to METC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to METC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, GRYRF has a market cap of 380.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while GRYRF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas GRYRF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to GRYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, NC has a market cap of 251.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while NC trades at $33.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas NC's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to NC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CCARF has a market cap of 227.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CCARF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CCARF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CCARF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CCARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CODQL has a market cap of 184.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CODQL trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CODQL's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CODQL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CODQL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, BTURF has a market cap of 110.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while BTURF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BTURF's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTURF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to BTURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, SGQRF has a market cap of 89.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while SGQRF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas SGQRF's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGQRF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to SGQRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, TBNGY has a market cap of 77.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while TBNGY trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas TBNGY's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBNGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to TBNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, TERCF has a market cap of 72.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while TERCF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas TERCF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TERCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to TERCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, AREC has a market cap of 65.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while AREC trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas AREC's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AREC's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to AREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, WRLC has a market cap of 39.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while WRLC trades at $425.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas WRLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to WRLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, ARECW has a market cap of 34.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while ARECW trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ARECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARECW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to ARECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, FSHRF has a market cap of 25.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while FSHRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FSHRF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSHRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to FSHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, FBMCF has a market cap of 19.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while FBMCF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FBMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FBMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to FBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CRSXF has a market cap of 15.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CRSXF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CRSXF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRSXF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CRSXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, GCLMF has a market cap of 13.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while GCLMF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas GCLMF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GCLMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to GCLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, MOAEF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while MOAEF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas MOAEF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOAEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to MOAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, WECFF has a market cap of 12.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while WECFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas WECFF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WECFF's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to WECFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, APMCF has a market cap of 11.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while APMCF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas APMCF's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APMCF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to APMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CAFZF has a market cap of 11.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CAFZF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CAFZF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to CAFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, ROYE has a market cap of 9.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while ROYE trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ROYE's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROYE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to ROYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, ALGCF has a market cap of 8.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while ALGCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ALGCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to ALGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, AJLGF has a market cap of 6.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while AJLGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas AJLGF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AJLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to AJLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, PVMCF has a market cap of 393811.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while PVMCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas PVMCF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PVMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to PVMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, MOAEY has a market cap of 257325.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while MOAEY trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas MOAEY's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MOAEY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to MOAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, FDGMF has a market cap of 248039.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while FDGMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FDGMF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FDGMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to FDGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, AEXE has a market cap of 145756.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while AEXE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas AEXE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEXE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to AEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, BRNE has a market cap of 23506.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while BRNE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BRNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRNE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to BRNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, KALG has a market cap of 18929.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while KALG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas KALG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KALG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is less volatile compared to KALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, SHGP has a market cap of 4812.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while SHGP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas SHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to SHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, CERX has a market cap of 536.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while CERX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CERX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CERX's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to CERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.

CNR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CNR stands at 3.59B. In comparison, BGNRF has a market cap of 86.00. Regarding current trading prices, CNR is priced at $67.22, while BGNRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CNR currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BGNRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGNRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNR is more volatile compared to BGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNR.