Copper Mountain Mining Corporation
Copper Mountain Mining Corporation CMMC.TO Peers
See (CMMC.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
CMMC.TO vs FM.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 16.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while FM.TO trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 10.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while LUN.TO trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 1193.00. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs CS.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while CS.TO trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is -33.10. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while HBM.TO trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while ERO.TO trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 74.64. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs IE.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while IE.TO trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 890.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while TKO.TO trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while AYM.TO trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs III.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 583.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while III.TO trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 483.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while MARI.TO trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 304.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while ASCU.TO trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -25.62. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 282.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while ARG.TO trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 162.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while FDY.TO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while NCU.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while DNT.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while RCLF.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMMC.TO has daily volatility of 3.62 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CMMC.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 15.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while CCI.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704674.00. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while AFX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while JUBA.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
CMMC.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison
CMMC.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMMC.TO stands at 533.81M. In comparison, TRQ.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CMMC.TO is priced at $2.49, while TRQ.TO trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMMC.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.58, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CMMC.TO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMMC.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMMC.TO.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM.TO | $19.40 | +3.69% | 16.06B | 77.60 | $0.25 | N/A |
LUN.TO | $11.93 | +2.23% | 10.35B | 1193.00 | $0.01 | +3.03% |
CS.TO | $6.95 | +0.58% | 5.30B | -33.10 | -$0.21 | N/A |
HBM.TO | $10.69 | +0.85% | 4.22B | 38.18 | $0.28 | +0.19% |
ERO.TO | $18.66 | +0.27% | 1.93B | 74.64 | $0.25 | N/A |
IE.TO | $9.31 | +3.67% | 1.23B | -7.96 | -$1.17 | N/A |
TKO.TO | $2.82 | +2.17% | 890.77M | -13.43 | -$0.21 | N/A |
AYM.TO | $5.78 | +8.85% | 835.77M | 10.70 | $0.54 | N/A |
III.TO | $3.60 | -1.37% | 583.03M | 5.54 | $0.65 | N/A |
CMMC.TO | $2.49 | -1.19% | 533.81M | -9.58 | -$0.26 | N/A |