Clipper Realty Inc.

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AVB trades at $177.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AVB's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while EQR trades at $63.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check EQR's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, ESS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while ESS trades at $254.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas ESS's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ESS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to ESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check ESS's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while SUI trades at $129.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is -47.06. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check SUI's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while MAA-PI trades at $54.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check MAA-PI's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while MAA trades at $135.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check MAA's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while INVH trades at $25.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is less volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check INVH's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while ELS trades at $67.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check ELS's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AMH-PH trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 49.71. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AMH-PH's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AMH-PG trades at $22.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 47.51. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AMH-PG's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while UDR trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check UDR's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while CPT trades at $108.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 30.27. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check CPT's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AMH trades at $30.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AMH's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AIRC trades at $39.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AIRC's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while MRP trades at $31.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MRP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check MRP's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, IRT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while IRT trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas IRT's P/E ratio is 68.98. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to IRT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to IRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check IRT's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while VRE trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check VRE's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while UMH trades at $16.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 202.35. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check UMH's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while UMH-PD trades at $22.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 113.52. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check UMH-PD's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CSR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while CSR trades at $63.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas CSR's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CSR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to CSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check CSR's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check CSR-PC's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 834.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AIV trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AIV's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AIV's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 754.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while NXRT trades at $30.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check NXRT's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 279M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while BRT trades at $14.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -28.76. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check BRT's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while SUNS trades at $9.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check SUNS's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while BHM trades at $11.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BHM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check BHM's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check BRG-PD's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AMH-PE's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check UMH-PC's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check AMH-PF's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while BRG trades at $26.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check BRG's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check BRG-PC's competition here

CLPR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLPR stands at 55.7M. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLPR is priced at $3.41, while ACC trades at $65.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLPR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.08, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLPR's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLPR is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLPR.Check ACC's competition here