Canadian Gold Corp.
Canadian Gold Corp. CGC.V Peers
See (CGC.V) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGC.V | CA$0.27 | -2.68% | 56.4M | -13.62 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| AEM.TO | CA$161.77 | -0.86% | 81.8B | 25.04 | CA$6.46 | +0.98% |
| NGT.TO | CA$72.34 | -0.18% | 80.5B | 12.00 | CA$6.03 | +1.73% |
| WPM.TO | CA$118.91 | +0.07% | 54B | 63.59 | CA$1.87 | +0.77% |
| ABX.TO | CA$26.32 | +0.38% | 45.3B | 14.46 | CA$1.82 | +2.12% |
| FNV.TO | CA$231.17 | -0.58% | 44.5B | 52.42 | CA$4.41 | +0.87% |
| K.TO | CA$20.26 | +0.10% | 24.9B | 15.01 | CA$1.35 | +0.74% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$66.31 | +2.50% | 16B | 21.74 | CA$3.05 | +1.89% |
| AGI.TO | CA$35.54 | +0.23% | 14.9B | 41.81 | CA$0.85 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
CGC.V vs AEM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 81.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while AEM.TO trades at CA$161.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs NGT.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while NGT.TO trades at CA$72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs WPM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while WPM.TO trades at CA$118.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 63.59. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ABX.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ABX.TO trades at CA$26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs FNV.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while FNV.TO trades at CA$231.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 52.42. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs K.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while K.TO trades at CA$20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs NCM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs LUG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while LUG.TO trades at CA$66.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs AGI.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while AGI.TO trades at CA$35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs EDV.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while EDV.TO trades at CA$42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -72.53. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs YRI.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs OR.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while OR.TO trades at CA$35.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 152.52. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs BTO.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while BTO.TO trades at CA$4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ELD.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ELD.TO trades at CA$27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs IMG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while IMG.TO trades at CA$9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs NGD.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs OLA.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs PRU.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs OGC.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while OGC.TO trades at CA$6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs EQX.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while EQX.TO trades at CA$9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs TXG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while TXG.TO trades at CA$44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs DPM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while DPM.TO trades at CA$21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SSL.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SSL.TO trades at CA$12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 86.50. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs KNT.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SSRM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs CEE.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs WDO.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while WDO.TO trades at CA$18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs CXB.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while CXB.TO trades at CA$3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs WGX.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ORA.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ORA.TO trades at CA$31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -17.72. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs AAUC.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs CG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 39.20. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs NG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while NG.TO trades at CA$4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -25.84. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs OSK.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SEA.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SEA.TO trades at CA$16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -112.33. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs CNL.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while CNL.TO trades at CA$14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SBB.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs KRR.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs RUP.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -170.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs GTWO.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs MSA.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 734.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ORE.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 668.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs AR.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ASE.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 626.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs IAU.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs PRB.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 499.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -15.31. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs GAU.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 479M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while GAU.TO trades at CA$1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs MND.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 469.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while MND.TO trades at CA$4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs FDR.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 417M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while FDR.V trades at CA$4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -33.69. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SGD.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs MOZ.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs JAG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 296.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SBI.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 260.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs STGO.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ITH.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 230.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs GOLD.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs DNG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs VGZ.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs FF.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs LGD.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs TNX.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs COG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SANU.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs CBR.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 111.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs NEXG.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs MAW.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ELO.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs STLR.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs XTG.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs GHRT.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs BSX.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs LN.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs G.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while G.TO trades at CA$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SIG.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs CCM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs TML.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs BLLG.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ESM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V and ESM.TO have similar daily volatility (7.14).
CGC.V vs VEIN.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs HMR.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs USGD.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs ME.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs NHK.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs BNN.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs NVO.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs VLC.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs VGCX.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs SGNL.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs GTCH.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs AMM.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs GRC.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs VAU.V Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while VAU.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs PME.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while PME.TO trades at CA$2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs CTOC.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs YRB.TO Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs QIM.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs WG.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is less volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.
CGC.V vs HWG.CN Comparison
CGC.V plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC.V stands at 56.4M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC.V is priced at CA$0.27, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC.V currently has a P/E ratio of -13.62, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, CGC.V's ROE is +13.62%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC.V is more volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.V.