Loading...

Cathedral Energy Services Ltd.

CETEFPNK
Energy
Oil & Gas Drilling
$3.57
$0.00(0.00%)

Cathedral Energy Services Ltd. CETEF Peers

See (CETEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Drilling Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
CETEF$3.57N/A119.8M3.50$1.02N/A
NBLWF$0.10-41.18%4.6BN/AN/AN/A
YZCFF$0.07N/A3.2B6.54$0.01N/A
ESVIF$1.78+0.37%328.1M-29.61-$0.06N/A
PHXHF$6.24+1.88%284.3M6.93$0.90+9.19%
SHLLF$0.89+9.38%227.2M2.33$0.38N/A
ARHVF$2.28N/A206.4M-5.07-$0.45+2.68%
NTNOF$0.56N/A174M-2.53-$0.22N/A
VTDRF$12.00N/A159.5M-4.21-$2.85N/A
AKTAF$1.66+1.84%63.2M4.88$0.34N/A
Showing 1 to 10 of 27 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

CETEF vs NBLWF Comparison

CETEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CETEF stands at 119.8M. In comparison, NBLWF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CETEF is priced at $3.57, while NBLWF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CETEF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.50, whereas NBLWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CETEF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NBLWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CETEF is more volatile compared to NBLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CETEF.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions