Candela Invest SA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CAND.BR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CAND.BR
Candela Invest SA (CAND.BR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAND.BR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAND.BR | €2.30 | +0.00% | 2.5M | -1.83 | -€1.26 | N/A |
| IWDD.AS | €7.56 | +0.48% | 134.1B | 24.69 | €0.31 | +1.17% |
| CSPX.AS | €642.03 | +1.47% | 115.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €115.32 | +0.98% | 113.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €113.15 | +1.37% | 65.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.95% |
| VWRL.AS | €147.70 | +0.97% | 50B | N/A | N/A | +1.35% |
| SP5H.PA | €340.10 | +1.22% | 24.5B | 27.59 | €12.25 | +0.98% |
| SP5C.PA | €433.05 | +1.47% | 24.3B | 27.74 | €15.48 | N/A |
| CSH2.PA | €108.86 | +0.02% | 18B | 28.32 | €3.84 | N/A |
| ISFA.AS | €11.94 | -0.12% | 17.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.85% |
Stock Comparison
CAND.BR vs IWDD.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IWDD.AS has a market cap of 134.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IWDD.AS trades at €7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IWDD.AS's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IWDD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IWDD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IWDD.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs CSPX.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CSPX.AS trades at €642.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs IWDA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IWDA.AS trades at €115.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs VUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while VUSA.AS trades at €113.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs VWRL.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while VWRL.AS trades at €147.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs SP5H.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SP5H.PA trades at €340.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs SP5C.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SP5C.PA trades at €433.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs CSH2.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs ISFA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs IUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IUSA.AS trades at €59.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs AMUN.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while AMUN.PA trades at €76.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs HAL.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while HAL.AS trades at €171.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check HAL.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs MEUD.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while MEUD.PA trades at €299.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs I500.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while I500.AS trades at €11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check I500.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs I50D.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while I50D.AS trades at €7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check I50D.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs GOLD.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while GOLD.PA trades at €161.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs IMEU.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IMEU.AS trades at €38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs GBLB.BR Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while GBLB.BR trades at €81.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is -30.53. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
CAND.BR vs WLDHC.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while WLDHC.PA trades at €15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs WLDH.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while WLDH.PA trades at €247.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs WLD.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while WLD.PA trades at €388.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check WLD.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs PSH.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check PSH.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs VHYL.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while VHYL.AS trades at €74.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs CEUU.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CEUU.AS trades at €11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs IEMM.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IEMM.AS trades at €52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs CBUG.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs SOF.BR Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SOF.BR trades at €228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 69.66. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SOF.BR's competition here
CAND.BR vs IEMA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IEMA.AS trades at €50.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs AEME.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while AEME.PA trades at €91.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check AEME.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs SJPD.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SJPD.AS trades at €8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs SJPE.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SJPE.AS trades at €14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs IWRD.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IWRD.AS trades at €83.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs LCWD.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs PHAU.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while PHAU.AS trades at €378.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs VEUR.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while VEUR.AS trades at €47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs ECRP.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ECRP.PA trades at €54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs CC4.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CC4.PA trades at €227.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CC4.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs IJPA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IJPA.AS trades at €65.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs CW8.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CW8.PA trades at €627.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CW8.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs AUEM.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while AUEM.PA trades at €8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs KBCA.BR Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while KBCA.BR trades at €78.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
CAND.BR vs EWLD.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while EWLD.PA trades at €37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs 500.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while 500.PA trades at €119.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check 500.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs TDIV.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while TDIV.AS trades at €52.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs UST.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while UST.PA trades at €90.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check UST.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs C50U.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while C50U.PA trades at €184.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check C50U.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs REINA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while REINA.AS trades at €29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check REINA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs ALLFG.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ALLFG.AS trades at €8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs EXCH.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while EXCH.AS trades at €8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs AEEM.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while AEEM.PA trades at €6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs USAC.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while USAC.PA trades at €598.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check USAC.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs EUEA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while EUEA.AS trades at €60.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs USA.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while USA.PA trades at €546.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check USA.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs SEMD.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SEMD.AS trades at €7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs S500H.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while S500H.PA trades at €99.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check S500H.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs S500.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while S500.PA trades at €174.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check S500.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs C50.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while C50.PA trades at €156.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check C50.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs CD5.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CD5.PA trades at €94.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CD5.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs MSE.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while MSE.PA trades at €66.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check MSE.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs 500X.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while 500X.AS trades at €43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check 500X.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs VERX.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while VERX.AS trades at €47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check VERX.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs CACC.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CACC.PA trades at €41.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CACC.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs CAC.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CAC.PA trades at €81.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CAC.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs SRIL.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SRIL.AS trades at €12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs WSRI.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs AGGD.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR and AGGD.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGGD.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs ICHD.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs ICHN.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ICHN.AS trades at €6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs EEUE.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while EEUE.PA trades at €19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs GLUH.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs EHYD.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs ROLA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ROLA.AS trades at €67.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR and ROLA.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROLA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs MF.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while MF.PA trades at €86.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -21.31. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check MF.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs IDSE.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IDSE.AS trades at €147.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs GEMU.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR and GEMU.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEMU.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs BNKE.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while BNKE.PA trades at €327.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs ISED.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ISED.AS trades at €7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ISED.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs EHYA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs WESE.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while WESE.PA trades at €79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR and WESE.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WESE.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs CB3.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while CB3.PA trades at €219.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check CB3.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs TKO.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while TKO.PA trades at €18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 80.35. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check TKO.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs IMBE.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs BREB.BR Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while BREB.BR trades at €103.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check BREB.BR's competition here
CAND.BR vs RF.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while RF.PA trades at €46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check RF.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs ESE.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ESE.PA trades at €30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ESE.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs PHAG.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while PHAG.AS trades at €60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs SEMI.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SEMI.AS trades at €15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs BNK.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while BNK.PA trades at €62.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check BNK.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs SGLU.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs SUOA.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs INRE.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, INRE.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while INRE.PA trades at €24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas INRE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to INRE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to INRE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check INRE.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs TI5A.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while TI5A.AS trades at €115.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs TNOW.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while TNOW.PA trades at €982.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs JAPB.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR and JAPB.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAPB.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs EPAB.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while EPAB.PA trades at €39.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs ANX.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while ANX.PA trades at €256.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check ANX.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs IGLE.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IGLE.AS trades at €3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
CAND.BR vs AASI.PA Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while AASI.PA trades at €51.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check AASI.PA's competition here
CAND.BR vs IUHE.AS Comparison April 2026
CAND.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAND.BR stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAND.BR is priced at €2.30, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAND.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.83, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAND.BR's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CAND.BR is less volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAND.BR.Check IUHE.AS's competition here