iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDD.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IWDD.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWDD.AS | €7.58 | -0.36% | 135.3B | 24.91 | €0.31 | +1.19% |
| CSPX.AS | €653.77 | +0.11% | 119.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €116.50 | -0.08% | 115.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €115.31 | +0.12% | 64.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.93% |
| VWRL.AS | €149.14 | -0.15% | 49.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.32% |
| SP5C.PA | €440.95 | +0.13% | 25.1B | 27.78 | €15.92 | N/A |
| SP5H.PA | €343.60 | -0.12% | 25.1B | 28.59 | €12.07 | +0.96% |
| CSH2.PA | €108.92 | +0.02% | 18.6B | 28.33 | €3.84 | N/A |
| ISFA.AS | €11.77 | -0.66% | 17.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.87% |
| IUSA.AS | €60.60 | +0.10% | 16.2B | N/A | N/A | +0.91% |
Stock Comparison
IWDD.AS vs CSPX.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CSPX.AS trades at €653.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IWDA.AS trades at €116.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while VUSA.AS trades at €115.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while VWRL.AS trades at €149.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SP5C.PA trades at €440.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SP5H.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SP5H.PA trades at €343.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ISFA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IUSA.AS trades at €60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while AMUN.PA trades at €75.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while HAL.AS trades at €170.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check HAL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while MEUD.PA trades at €296.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs I500.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while I500.AS trades at €11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check I500.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while I50D.AS trades at €7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS and I50D.AS have similar daily volatility (0.13).Check I50D.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while GOLD.PA trades at €159.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IMEU.AS trades at €38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WLDHC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while WLDHC.PA trades at €15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while WLD.PA trades at €392.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WLD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WLDH.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while WLDH.PA trades at €248.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while GBLB.BR trades at €79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is -31.92. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check PSH.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while VHYL.AS trades at €74.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IEMM.AS trades at €53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CEUU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CEUU.AS trades at €11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CBUG.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while AEME.PA trades at €93.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AEME.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IEMA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IEMA.AS trades at €51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SOF.BR trades at €219.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SOF.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SJPD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SJPD.AS trades at €8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SJPE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SJPE.AS trades at €13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IWRD.AS trades at €84.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while PHAU.AS trades at €372.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CC4.PA trades at €226.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CC4.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while VEUR.AS trades at €47.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CW8.PA trades at €634.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CW8.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IJPA.AS trades at €63.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while AUEM.PA trades at €8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EWLD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while EWLD.PA trades at €37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs 500.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while 500.PA trades at €121.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check 500.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while KBCA.BR trades at €76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs UST.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while UST.PA trades at €93.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check UST.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while TDIV.AS trades at €52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while C50U.PA trades at €180.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check C50U.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while REINA.AS trades at €29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check REINA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ALLFG.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ALLFG.AS trades at €8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while AEEM.PA trades at €7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while EXCH.AS trades at €8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while USAC.PA trades at €611.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check USAC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs USA.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while USA.PA trades at €558.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check USA.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SEMD.AS trades at €7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while EUEA.AS trades at €59.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while S500H.PA trades at €100.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check S500H.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs S500.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while S500.PA trades at €177.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check S500.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CD5.PA trades at €93.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CD5.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs C50.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while C50.PA trades at €154.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check C50.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while 500X.AS trades at €44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check 500X.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while MSE.PA trades at €65.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check MSE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while VERX.AS trades at €47.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VERX.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SRIL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SRIL.AS trades at €12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CAC.PA trades at €80.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CAC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CACC.PA trades at €40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CACC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AGGD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to AGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AGGD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GLUH.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ROLA.AS trades at €68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ROLA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while EEUE.PA trades at €19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EHYD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs MF.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while MF.PA trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -21.28. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check MF.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IDSE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IDSE.AS trades at €146.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GEMU.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ISED.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ISED.AS trades at €7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ISED.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS and EHYA.AS have similar daily volatility (0.13).Check EHYA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while BNKE.PA trades at €315.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SEMI.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SEMI.AS trades at €16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while CB3.PA trades at €219.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CB3.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while WESE.PA trades at €80.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WESE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while TKO.PA trades at €17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 79.83. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TKO.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IMBE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ESE.PA trades at €30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ESE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while BREB.BR trades at €102.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check BREB.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs RF.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while RF.PA trades at €45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check RF.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while PHAG.AS trades at €58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SGLU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SUOA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs INRE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, INRE.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while INRE.PA trades at €25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas INRE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INRE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to INRE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check INRE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while BNK.PA trades at €60.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check BNK.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ANX.PA trades at €264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ANX.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while TNOW.PA trades at €1,020.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 39.49. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TI5A.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while TI5A.AS trades at €116.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs JAPB.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to JAPB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check JAPB.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while EPAB.PA trades at €38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while AASI.PA trades at €52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AASI.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IGLE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IGLE.AS trades at €3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IUHE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS and IUHE.AS have similar daily volatility (0.13).Check IUHE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ACWI.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 135.3B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.58, while ACWI.PA trades at €558.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.91, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ACWI.PA's competition here