Wendel
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MF.PA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MF.PA
Wendel (MF.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MF.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF.PA | €85.35 | -2.85% | 3.6B | -21.07 | -€4.01 | +7.06% |
| IWDD.AS | €7.58 | -0.08% | 135.1B | 24.87 | €0.31 | +0.54% |
| CSPX.AS | €654.10 | +0.84% | 118.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €116.66 | +0.48% | 115.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €115.38 | +0.85% | 64.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.47% |
| VWRL.AS | €149.28 | +0.44% | 49B | N/A | N/A | +0.58% |
| SP5C.PA | €440.87 | +0.77% | 25B | 27.67 | €15.92 | N/A |
| SP5H.PA | €343.40 | +0.25% | 25B | 28.49 | €12.07 | +0.97% |
| CSH2.PA | €108.90 | +0.00% | 18.6B | 28.33 | €3.84 | N/A |
| ISFA.AS | €11.78 | -0.46% | 17.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
MF.PA vs IWDD.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IWDD.AS has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IWDD.AS trades at €7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IWDD.AS's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IWDD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IWDD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IWDD.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs CSPX.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CSPX.AS trades at €654.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IWDA.AS trades at €116.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while VUSA.AS trades at €115.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while VWRL.AS trades at €149.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SP5C.PA trades at €440.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SP5H.PA trades at €343.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IUSA.AS trades at €60.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while AMUN.PA trades at €77.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while HAL.AS trades at €171.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check HAL.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while MEUD.PA trades at €297.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs I500.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while I500.AS trades at €11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check I500.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while I50D.AS trades at €7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check I50D.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while GOLD.PA trades at €159.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IMEU.AS trades at €38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while WLD.PA trades at €392.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check WLD.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs WLDHC.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while WLDHC.PA trades at €15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while WLDH.PA trades at €248.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while GBLB.BR trades at €80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is -31.83. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
MF.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check PSH.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while VHYL.AS trades at €74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IEMM.AS trades at €53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs CEUU.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CEUU.AS trades at €11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs CBUG.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while AEME.PA trades at €92.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check AEME.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs IEMA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IEMA.AS trades at €51.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SOF.BR trades at €222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 68.32. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SOF.BR's competition here
MF.PA vs SJPD.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SJPD.AS trades at €8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs SJPE.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SJPE.AS trades at €13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IWRD.AS trades at €84.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while PHAU.AS trades at €373.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CC4.PA trades at €226.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CC4.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while VEUR.AS trades at €47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CW8.PA trades at €635.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CW8.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IJPA.AS trades at €63.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while AUEM.PA trades at €8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs 500.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while 500.PA trades at €121.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check 500.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs EWLD.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while EWLD.PA trades at €37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while KBCA.BR trades at €77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
MF.PA vs UST.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while UST.PA trades at €93.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check UST.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while TDIV.AS trades at €52.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while C50U.PA trades at €181.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check C50U.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while REINA.AS trades at €29.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check REINA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ALLFG.AS trades at €8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while AEEM.PA trades at €7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while EXCH.AS trades at €8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while USAC.PA trades at €610.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check USAC.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs USA.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while USA.PA trades at €556.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check USA.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SEMD.AS trades at €7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while EUEA.AS trades at €60.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while S500H.PA trades at €100.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check S500H.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs S500.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while S500.PA trades at €177.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check S500.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CD5.PA trades at €93.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CD5.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs C50.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while C50.PA trades at €155.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check C50.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while 500X.AS trades at €44.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check 500X.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while MSE.PA trades at €65.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check MSE.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while VERX.AS trades at €47.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check VERX.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs SRIL.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SRIL.AS trades at €12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CACC.PA trades at €40.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CACC.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CAC.PA trades at €80.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CAC.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs AGGD.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to AGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check AGGD.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs GLUH.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while EEUE.PA trades at €19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ROLA.AS trades at €68.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ROLA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs EHYD.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs IDSE.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IDSE.AS trades at €146.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check GEMU.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs ISED.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ISED.AS trades at €7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ISED.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while BNKE.PA trades at €319.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while CB3.PA trades at €220.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check CB3.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while WESE.PA trades at €79.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check WESE.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while TKO.PA trades at €18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 81.48. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check TKO.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs SEMI.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SEMI.AS trades at €15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs IMBE.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ESE.PA trades at €30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 28.07. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ESE.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs RF.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while RF.PA trades at €46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check RF.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while BREB.BR trades at €103.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check BREB.BR's competition here
MF.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while PHAG.AS trades at €58.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs SGLU.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs SUOA.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while BNK.PA trades at €61.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check BNK.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs INRE.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, INRE.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while INRE.PA trades at €24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas INRE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INRE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to INRE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check INRE.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ANX.PA trades at €263.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ANX.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while TNOW.PA trades at €1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 39.35. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs TI5A.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while TI5A.AS trades at €116.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs JAPB.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to JAPB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check JAPB.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while EPAB.PA trades at €38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while AASI.PA trades at €52.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check AASI.PA's competition here
MF.PA vs IGLE.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IGLE.AS trades at €3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs IUHE.AS Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check IUHE.AS's competition here
MF.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison April 2026
MF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF.PA stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF.PA is priced at €85.35, while ACWI.PA trades at €558.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.07, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF.PA's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF.PA is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.PA.Check ACWI.PA's competition here