mVISE AG
mVISE AG (C1V.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (C1V.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1V.DE | €0.49 | -10.91% | 1M | -4.08 | -€0.12 | N/A |
| TM5.DE | €175.88 | +1.37% | 196.7B | 20.94 | €8.40 | +1.85% |
| BAC.DE | €42.97 | +1.14% | 181.2B | 12.14 | €3.54 | +5.48% |
| CTM.F | €8.56 | +0.00% | 177.3B | 10.19 | €0.84 | +6.78% |
| SOBA.DE | €24.37 | -0.18% | 170.6B | 9.30 | €2.62 | +3.92% |
| DTE.DE | €30.77 | -3.36% | 148.9B | 15.62 | €1.97 | +3.25% |
| SFT.F | €19.76 | -4.32% | 112.6B | 6.77 | €2.92 | +0.27% |
| CTP2.DE | €24.23 | +0.62% | 87.6B | 5.20 | €4.66 | +4.18% |
| FTE.DE | €18.00 | +2.13% | 47.8B | 89.98 | €0.20 | +4.17% |
| VODI.DE | €1.32 | +0.96% | 30.5B | -8.24 | -€0.16 | +3.41% |
Stock Comparison
C1V.DE vs TM5.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 196.7B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TM5.DE trades at €175.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TM5.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs BAC.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 181.2B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while BAC.DE trades at €42.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check BAC.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs CTM.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, CTM.F has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while CTM.F trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas CTM.F's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CTM.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to CTM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check CTM.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs SOBA.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while SOBA.DE trades at €24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs DTE.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while DTE.DE trades at €30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check DTE.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs SFT.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, SFT.F has a market cap of 112.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while SFT.F trades at €19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas SFT.F's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SFT.F's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to SFT.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check SFT.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs CTP2.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while CTP2.DE trades at €24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs FTE.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while FTE.DE trades at €18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 89.98. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check FTE.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs VODI.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while VODI.DE trades at €1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check VODI.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs AISF.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, AISF.F has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while AISF.F trades at €9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas AISF.F's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AISF.F's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to AISF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check AISF.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs TNE5.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs BTQ.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while BTQ.DE trades at €2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check BTQ.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs O2D.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while O2D.DE trades at €2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check O2D.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs SWTF.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, SWTF.F has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while SWTF.F trades at €2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas SWTF.F's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SWTF.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to SWTF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check SWTF.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs TA1.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TA1.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TA1.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TA1.F has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TA1.F trades at €9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TA1.F's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TA1.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TA1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TA1.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs TQI.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TQI.DE trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TQI.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TQIR.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TQIR.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TQIR.DE trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TQIR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TQIR.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TQIR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TQIR.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs UTDI.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while UTDI.DE trades at €27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TAFG.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TAFG.F has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TAFG.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TAFG.F's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TAFG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TAFG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TAFG.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs 1U1.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while 1U1.DE trades at €23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs FNTN.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while FNTN.DE trades at €26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs FNTN.HM Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while FNTN.HM trades at €26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check FNTN.HM's competition here
C1V.DE vs JASN.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, JASN.F has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while JASN.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas JASN.F's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to JASN.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to JASN.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check JASN.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs 4HW.F Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, 4HW.F has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while 4HW.F trades at €1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas 4HW.F's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 4HW.F's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to 4HW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check 4HW.F's competition here
C1V.DE vs E4C.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while E4C.DE trades at €6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check E4C.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs LSX.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while LSX.DE trades at €3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to LSX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check LSX.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TGT.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TGT.DE has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TGT.DE trades at €0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TGT.DE's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TGT.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TGT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TGT.DE's competition here
C1V.DE vs TH51.MU Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TH51.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TH51.MU trades at €1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TH51.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TH51.MU's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TH51.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TH51.MU's competition here
C1V.DE vs TC1.DE Comparison April 2026
C1V.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, C1V.DE stands at 1M. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, C1V.DE is priced at €0.49, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
C1V.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -4.08, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, C1V.DE's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, C1V.DE is more volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for C1V.DE.Check TC1.DE's competition here