Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. BZH Peers
See (BZH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZH | $20.69 | -5.35% | 626.98M | 6.70 | $3.09 | N/A |
| DHI | $119.60 | -2.51% | 36.74B | 8.46 | $14.13 | +1.25% |
| LEN | $105.63 | -3.49% | 27.76B | 7.71 | $13.70 | +1.89% |
| LEN-B | $101.13 | -3.66% | 27.54B | 7.38 | $13.71 | +1.89% |
| NVR | $7,052.00 | -2.15% | 20.62B | 14.54 | $484.89 | N/A |
| PHM | $99.06 | -2.23% | 19.85B | 7.00 | $14.16 | +0.85% |
| TOL | $103.96 | -0.53% | 10.34B | 7.16 | $14.51 | +0.91% |
| TMHC | $57.16 | -2.79% | 5.74B | 6.91 | $8.27 | N/A |
| SKY | $87.51 | -2.40% | 5.01B | 30.92 | $2.83 | N/A |
| MDC | $62.98 | +0.05% | 4.73B | 11.91 | $5.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BZH vs DHI Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, DHI has a market cap of 36.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while DHI trades at $119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas DHI's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to DHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs LEN Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, LEN has a market cap of 27.76B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while LEN trades at $105.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas LEN's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to LEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs LEN-B Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, LEN-B has a market cap of 27.54B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while LEN-B trades at $101.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas LEN-B's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEN-B's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to LEN-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs NVR Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, NVR has a market cap of 20.62B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while NVR trades at $7,052.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas NVR's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to NVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs PHM Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, PHM has a market cap of 19.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while PHM trades at $99.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas PHM's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to PHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs TOL Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, TOL has a market cap of 10.34B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while TOL trades at $103.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas TOL's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to TOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs TMHC Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, TMHC has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while TMHC trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas TMHC's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMHC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to TMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs SKY Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, SKY has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while SKY trades at $87.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas SKY's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to SKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs MDC Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, MDC has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while MDC trades at $62.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas MDC's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to MDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs MTH Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, MTH has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while MTH trades at $64.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas MTH's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to MTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs CVCO Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, CVCO has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while CVCO trades at $516.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas CVCO's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVCO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to CVCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs KBH Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, KBH has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while KBH trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas KBH's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to KBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs MHO Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, MHO has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while MHO trades at $106.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas MHO's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to MHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs TPH Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, TPH has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while TPH trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas TPH's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to TPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs GRBK Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, GRBK has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while GRBK trades at $59.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas GRBK's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRBK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to GRBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs DFH Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, DFH has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while DFH trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas DFH's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is less volatile compared to DFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs CCS Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, CCS has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while CCS trades at $52.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas CCS's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to CCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs LGIH Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, LGIH has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while LGIH trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas LGIH's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGIH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is less volatile compared to LGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs GRBK-PA Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, GRBK-PA has a market cap of 965.81M. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while GRBK-PA trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas GRBK-PA's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRBK-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to GRBK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs HOVNP Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, HOVNP has a market cap of 630.32M. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while HOVNP trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas HOVNP's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOVNP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to HOVNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs HOV Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, HOV has a market cap of 585.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while HOV trades at $89.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas HOV's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOV's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is less volatile compared to HOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs LEGH Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, LEGH has a market cap of 546.75M. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while LEGH trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas LEGH's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to LEGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs SIC Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, SIC has a market cap of 375.96M. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while SIC trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas SIC's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is more volatile compared to SIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs UHG Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, UHG has a market cap of 106.07M. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while UHG trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas UHG's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UHG's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is less volatile compared to UHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.
BZH vs SPHL Comparison
BZH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZH stands at 626.98M. In comparison, SPHL has a market cap of 6.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BZH is priced at $20.69, while SPHL trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZH currently has a P/E ratio of 6.70, whereas SPHL's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, BZH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPHL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZH is less volatile compared to SPHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZH.