BuzzFeed, Inc.
BuzzFeed, Inc. BZFD Peers
See (BZFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZFD | $2.13 | -0.47% | 79.2M | -4.26 | -$0.50 | N/A |
| GOOG | $169.41 | +1.01% | 2T | 18.93 | $8.95 | +0.48% |
| GOOGL | $168.04 | +1.12% | 2T | 18.75 | $8.96 | +0.48% |
| META | $687.95 | +3.16% | 1.7T | 26.92 | $25.56 | +0.29% |
| SPOT | $701.11 | +4.48% | 140.9B | 109.89 | $6.38 | N/A |
| DASH | $220.23 | +3.06% | 93.3B | 278.77 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | N/A | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $84.89 | +1.36% | 29.2B | 8.42 | $10.08 | N/A |
| TME | $17.71 | +1.93% | 26.8B | 20.84 | $0.85 | +1.02% |
| PINS | $33.82 | +2.07% | 22.9B | 12.43 | $2.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BZFD vs GOOG Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GOOG trades at $169.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs GOOGL Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GOOGL trades at $168.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs META Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while META trades at $687.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas META's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SPOT Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SPOT trades at $701.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 109.89. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs DASH Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while DASH trades at $220.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 278.77. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TWTR Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs BIDU Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while BIDU trades at $84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TME Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TME trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs PINS Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while PINS trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs RDDT Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while RDDT trades at $118.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TWLO Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TWLO trades at $119.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -521.17. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ZG Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ZG trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -197.57. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs Z Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while Z trades at $70.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -200.60. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs YNDX Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SNAP Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SNAP trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -27.27. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs NBIS Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while NBIS trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs MTCH Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while MTCH trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs DJT Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while DJT trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs DJTWW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while DJTWW trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -31.14. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs IACVV Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs CARG Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while CARG trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 86.49. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs IAC Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while IAC trades at $36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs YELP Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while YELP trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs WB Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while WB trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs GENI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GENI trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -50.16. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs YY Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs DOYU Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while DOYU trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs NN Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while NN trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ANGIV Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TBLAW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TBLAW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs GRPN Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GRPN trades at $32.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -32.53. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs FVRR Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while FVRR trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TBLA Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TBLA trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 89.50. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs MOMO Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while MOMO trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs JFIN Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 880.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while JFIN trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs EVER Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 872.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while EVER trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs OPRA Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 833.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while OPRA trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ANGI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 815.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ANGI trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ATHM Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 728.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ATHM trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs GETY Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 715.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GETY trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs MAX Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 703.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while MAX trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SSTK Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 646.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SSTK trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SMWB Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SMWB trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -34.36. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs NNAVW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while NNAVW trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs KIND Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 606.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while KIND trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TTGT Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 598.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TTGT trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs THRY Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 592.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while THRY trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs PERI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 482.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while PERI trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -59.50. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs UPXI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 425.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while UPXI trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ZH Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 344.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ZH trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -130.17. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TRVG Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 291.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TRVG trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs AREN Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while AREN trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs OB Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 246.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while OB trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SEAT Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SEAT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -51.33. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs JOYY Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while JOYY trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TRUE Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TRUE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ASST Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ASST trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ILLR Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ILLR trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ILLRW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 113.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ILLRW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs CCG Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while CCG trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs BODY Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs GIFT Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GIFT trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs IZEA Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while IZEA trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs PODC Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while PODC trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs EGLX Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ZDGE Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ZDGE trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs MNY Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while MNY trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SCOR Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SCOR trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs BODI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while BODI trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SEATW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SEATW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LTRPA Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LTRPB Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LYL Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs HRYU Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LIZI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs FAZE Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LCFYW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LCFYW trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -125.97. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LKCO Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs KRKR Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while KRKR trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs QTT Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LOV Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs LCFY Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while LCFY trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ONFO Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ONFO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs NAMI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while NAMI trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ROI Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SLE Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SLE trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs CRTD Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while CRTD trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs CMCM Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while CMCM trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs TC Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while TC trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs MNYWW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs STBX Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs FAZEW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs ONFOW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 666.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while ONFOW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SLGG Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs FENG Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 236.5K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while FENG trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SOGP Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 31.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SOGP trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs GROM Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs GROMW Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.
BZFD vs SFUN Comparison
BZFD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BZFD stands at 79.2M. In comparison, SFUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BZFD is priced at $2.13, while SFUN trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BZFD currently has a P/E ratio of -4.26, whereas SFUN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BZFD's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFUN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZFD is less volatile compared to SFUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZFD.