BT Group plc
BT Group plc (BTQ.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BTQ.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTQ.DE | €2.09 | +0.00% | 20.8B | 13.93 | €0.15 | N/A |
| TM5.DE | €184.94 | -1.33% | 208.6B | 22.31 | €8.36 | +1.75% |
| BAC.DE | €43.71 | +0.43% | 184B | 12.40 | €3.52 | +5.40% |
| CTM.F | €8.56 | +0.00% | 177.3B | 10.19 | €0.84 | +6.78% |
| SOBA.DE | €23.43 | -2.07% | 163.6B | 8.92 | €2.62 | +4.09% |
| DTE.DE | €32.59 | -0.70% | 158.2B | 16.59 | €1.97 | +2.75% |
| SFT.F | €20.39 | -2.56% | 118.7B | 7.13 | €2.92 | +0.29% |
| CTP2.DE | €26.35 | -1.00% | 95.4B | 5.69 | €4.64 | +3.96% |
| FTE.DE | €16.86 | -1.52% | 45.1B | 84.78 | €0.20 | +4.42% |
| AISF.F | €9.75 | +0.00% | 28.8B | 22.05 | €0.44 | +9.55% |
Stock Comparison
BTQ.DE vs TM5.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TM5.DE trades at €184.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TM5.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs BAC.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 184B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while BAC.DE trades at €43.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check BAC.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs CTM.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, CTM.F has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while CTM.F trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CTM.F's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTM.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to CTM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check CTM.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs SOBA.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while SOBA.DE trades at €23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs DTE.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while DTE.DE trades at €32.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check DTE.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs SFT.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, SFT.F has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while SFT.F trades at €20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SFT.F's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFT.F's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to SFT.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check SFT.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs CTP2.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while CTP2.DE trades at €26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs FTE.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while FTE.DE trades at €16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 84.78. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check FTE.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs AISF.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, AISF.F has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while AISF.F trades at €9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas AISF.F's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AISF.F's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to AISF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check AISF.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs VODI.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while VODI.DE trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check VODI.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TNE5.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs O2D.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, O2D.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while O2D.DE trades at €2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas O2D.DE's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to O2D.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to O2D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check O2D.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs SWTF.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, SWTF.F has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while SWTF.F trades at €2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SWTF.F's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWTF.F's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to SWTF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check SWTF.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TA1.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TA1.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TA1.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TA1.F has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TA1.F trades at €9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TA1.F's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TA1.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to TA1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TA1.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TQI.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TQI.DE trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TQI.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TQIR.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TQIR.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TQIR.DE trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TQIR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TQIR.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to TQIR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TQIR.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs UTDI.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while UTDI.DE trades at €27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TAFG.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TAFG.F has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TAFG.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TAFG.F's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TAFG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to TAFG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TAFG.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs 1U1.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while 1U1.DE trades at €24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs FNTN.HM Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while FNTN.HM trades at €27.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check FNTN.HM's competition here
BTQ.DE vs FNTN.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while FNTN.DE trades at €27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs JASN.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, JASN.F has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while JASN.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JASN.F's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JASN.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to JASN.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check JASN.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs 4HW.F Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, 4HW.F has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while 4HW.F trades at €2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas 4HW.F's P/E ratio is -23.56. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4HW.F's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to 4HW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check 4HW.F's competition here
BTQ.DE vs E4C.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while E4C.DE trades at €9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check E4C.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs LSX.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while LSX.DE trades at €3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to LSX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check LSX.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TGT.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TGT.DE has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TGT.DE trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TGT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGT.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to TGT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TGT.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs C1V.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, C1V.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while C1V.DE trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas C1V.DE's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to C1V.DE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to C1V.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check C1V.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TC1.DE Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is more volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TC1.DE's competition here
BTQ.DE vs TH51.MU Comparison March 2026
BTQ.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BTQ.DE stands at 20.8B. In comparison, TH51.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BTQ.DE is priced at €2.09, while TH51.MU trades at €2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BTQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TH51.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BTQ.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TH51.MU's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BTQ.DE is less volatile compared to TH51.MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BTQ.DE.Check TH51.MU's competition here