Greenwing Resources Ltd
Greenwing Resources Ltd (BSSMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BSSMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSSMF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 305.9M | -100.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
BHPLF | $27.99 | +3.67% | 126.6B | 11.13 | $2.24 | +4.59% |
RTPPF | $59.96 | +0.15% | 102B | 9.55 | $6.28 | +6.70% |
RTNTF | $71.00 | +0.00% | 100B | 11.31 | $6.28 | +3.31% |
GMBXF | $6.38 | -0.62% | 49.7B | 12.76 | $0.50 | +3.75% |
GLCNF | $3.80 | -5.24% | 45.3B | -29.38 | -$0.13 | +2.98% |
GLNCY | $7.55 | -5.27% | 44.9B | -29.04 | -$0.26 | +2.80% |
FSUMF | $12.15 | -0.41% | 37.4B | 9.57 | $1.27 | +7.25% |
FSUGY | $24.09 | +1.47% | 37B | 9.52 | $2.53 | +7.63% |
CMCLF | $1.36 | +22.52% | 33.3B | 14.40 | $0.10 | +2.93% |
Stock Comparison
BSSMF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 126.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while BHPLF trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check BHPLF's competition here
BSSMF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while RTPPF trades at $59.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
BSSMF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while RTNTF trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check RTNTF's competition here
BSSMF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while GMBXF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check GMBXF's competition here
BSSMF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while GLCNF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -29.38. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check GLCNF's competition here
BSSMF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while GLNCY trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -29.04. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check GLNCY's competition here
BSSMF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while FSUMF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check FSUMF's competition here
BSSMF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while FSUGY trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check FSUGY's competition here
BSSMF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while CMCLF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check CMCLF's competition here
BSSMF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while NGLOY trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check NGLOY's competition here
BSSMF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while AAUKF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and AAUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAUKF's competition here
BSSMF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while TCKRF trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 100.76. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check TCKRF's competition here
BSSMF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while IPOAF trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check IPOAF's competition here
BSSMF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while IVPAF trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check IVPAF's competition here
BSSMF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
BSSMF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while BDNNY trades at $63.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check BDNNY's competition here
BSSMF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while SHTLF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
BSSMF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check JXMNF's competition here
BSSMF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while LYSDY trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 196.25. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check LYSDY's competition here
BSSMF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while LYSCF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 259.07. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check LYSCF's competition here
BSSMF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ABML's competition here
BSSMF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while SMMYY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check SMMYY's competition here
BSSMF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
BSSMF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PUTKY trades at $29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PUTKY's competition here
BSSMF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
BSSMF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
BSSMF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MALRF trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
BSSMF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
BSSMF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MALRY trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MALRY's competition here
BSSMF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PILBF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PILBF's competition here
BSSMF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while NGXXF trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -55.14. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check NGXXF's competition here
BSSMF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check FLMMF's competition here
BSSMF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check IIDDY's competition here
BSSMF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
BSSMF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
BSSMF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PTNDY's competition here
BSSMF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MIMTF's competition here
BSSMF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check NICMF's competition here
BSSMF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check DWMNF's competition here
BSSMF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
BSSMF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check AFBOF's competition here
BSSMF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ERMAF's competition here
BSSMF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while SOUHY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.81. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check SOUHY's competition here
BSSMF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ILKAF trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ILKAF's competition here
BSSMF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PTNDF's competition here
BSSMF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ILKAY trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILKAY's competition here
BSSMF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ERMAY trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAY's competition here
BSSMF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while DETRF trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETRF's competition here
BSSMF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check TAOFF's competition here
BSSMF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ADTLF's competition here
BSSMF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while LINRF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -54.62. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and LINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LINRF's competition here
BSSMF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ADMLF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ADMLF's competition here
BSSMF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
BSSMF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MFRVF's competition here
BSSMF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ATUSF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ATUSF's competition here
BSSMF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 992.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while FMCXF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check FMCXF's competition here
BSSMF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check STTSY's competition here
BSSMF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check AUSDF's competition here
BSSMF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 871.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while AMVMF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 84.38. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMVMF's competition here
BSSMF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ALMTF's competition here
BSSMF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 851.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check AFMJF's competition here
BSSMF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check CTJHF's competition here
BSSMF vs SAMMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, SAMMF has a market cap of 594.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while SAMMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas SAMMF's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAMMF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and SAMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAMMF's competition here
BSSMF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 586.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while VULNF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
BSSMF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check NCKAF's competition here
BSSMF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while SLGGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check SLGGF's competition here
BSSMF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 533M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while CREQF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and CREQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CREQF's competition here
BSSMF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 523.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MJDLF trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MJDLF's competition here
BSSMF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while REEMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -33.02. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check REEMF's competition here
BSSMF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 496.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while FGOVF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -93.83. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check FGOVF's competition here
BSSMF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check TTNNF's competition here
BSSMF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PTTMF's competition here
BSSMF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check OSTTF's competition here
BSSMF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MCRZF's competition here
BSSMF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 464.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while BQSSF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check BQSSF's competition here
BSSMF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PMETF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -94.33. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PMETF's competition here
BSSMF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 451.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MNXMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.14. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNXMF's competition here
BSSMF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check BIRNF's competition here
BSSMF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
BSSMF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 378.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while KMRPF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check KMRPF's competition here
BSSMF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MLYF's competition here
BSSMF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while FWEDF trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check FWEDF's competition here
BSSMF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check CTJHY's competition here
BSSMF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PXMFF's competition here
BSSMF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MCHHF's competition here
BSSMF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MLXEF's competition here
BSSMF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 321.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ERLFF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ERLFF's competition here
BSSMF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 318M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ARAFF's competition here
BSSMF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check SVMLF's competition here
BSSMF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 303.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while CGMLF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check CGMLF's competition here
BSSMF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and RTLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTLGF's competition here
BSSMF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 301.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while PRMNF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -20.07. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check PRMNF's competition here
BSSMF vs MMILF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MMILF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MMILF's competition here
BSSMF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while SRHYY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and SRHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRHYY's competition here
BSSMF vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 265.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while MGMNF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check MGMNF's competition here
BSSMF vs LRSRF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check LRSRF's competition here
BSSMF vs ERDCF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 255.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while ERDCF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -69.74. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check ERDCF's competition here
BSSMF vs STQNF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STQNF's competition here
BSSMF vs LTSRF Comparison August 2025
BSSMF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BSSMF stands at 305.9M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BSSMF is priced at $1.00, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BSSMF currently has a P/E ratio of -100.00, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, BSSMF's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BSSMF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BSSMF.Check LTSRF's competition here