Boston Omaha Corporation
Boston Omaha Corporation BOMN Peers
See (BOMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOMN | $25.76 | N/A | 765.03M | 8.65 | $2.98 | N/A |
| OMC | $76.95 | +0.87% | 15.01B | 10.51 | $7.32 | +3.64% |
| IPG | $25.49 | +1.23% | 9.42B | 19.46 | $1.31 | +5.19% |
| WPP | $39.77 | -0.77% | 8.61B | 12.27 | $3.24 | +6.27% |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.46B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| MGNI | $15.54 | -2.14% | 2.19B | 70.64 | $0.22 | N/A |
| CRTO | $28.42 | -0.91% | 1.52B | 11.65 | $2.44 | N/A |
| STGW | $5.30 | +0.57% | 1.42B | -530.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ZD | $32.59 | -1.06% | 1.37B | 18.62 | $1.75 | N/A |
| IAS | $8.09 | +0.62% | 1.33B | 27.90 | $0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BOMN vs OMC Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 15.01B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while OMC trades at $76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs IPG Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while IPG trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs WPP Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while WPP trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MDCA Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MGNI Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MGNI trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 70.64. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs CRTO Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CRTO trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs STGW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STGW trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -530.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ZD Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ZD trades at $32.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs IAS Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while IAS trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs CMPR Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CMPR trades at $44.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs EEX Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 924.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while EEX trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is -66.43. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs QNST Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 874.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while QNST trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1535.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs DLX Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 714.05M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DLX trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs CCO Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 583.64M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CCO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs NCMI Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 481.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while NCMI trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -26.89. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs CTV Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs BOC Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 442.56M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while BOC trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 477.83. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ADV Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 408.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADV trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs QUOT Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.42M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs TRMR Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs NEXN Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 355.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while NEXN trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ADTH Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.52M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs TZOO Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 152.00M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TZOO trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MCTR Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 126.22M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MCTR trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 412.50. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs SDM Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 115.99M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SDM trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 72.33. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs TSQ Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 115.28M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TSQ trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs CDLX Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 108.15M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CDLX trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ATY Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.89M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ICLK Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82.01M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs STCN Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.17M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MCHX Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 71.12M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MCHX trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -14.73. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs INUV Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 67.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while INUV trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ABLV Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 60.26M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ABLV trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs XNET Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 59.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while XNET trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is 239.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs FLNT Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 49.61M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while FLNT trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ADTHW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.37M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs WIMI Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 42.23M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while WIMI trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs GSMG Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MOXC Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.91M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ACCS Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 35.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ACCS trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MOBQ Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 33.62M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MOBQ trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs HHS Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 33.31M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while HHS trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs HAO Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 27.16M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while HAO trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs STRN Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.68M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs SWAG Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 23.63M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SWAG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs QMMM Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 21.51M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while QMMM trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs CHR Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 17.69M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CHR trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs TNMG Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 16.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TNMG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs STFS Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 16.04M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STFS trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STFS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ISIG Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.90M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs DRCT Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 9.60M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DRCT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs VSME Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 8.45M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while VSME trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs LDWY Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 7.93M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while LDWY trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs DMS Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.49M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs DRCTW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.77M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ADVWW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 4.18M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs BAOS Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 3.74M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while BAOS trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs CNET Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.53M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CNET trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MGOL Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.41M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs SRAX Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SRAX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs STRNW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs ABLVW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 611945.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ABLVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs TRKAW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529804.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of +4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs SWAGW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 297490.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SWAGW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs MOBQW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 135773.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MOBQW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.
BOMN vs GSMGW Comparison
BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765.03M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9097.00. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.