Boston Omaha Corporation

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while OMC trades at $79.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check OMC's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while IPG trades at $27.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check IPG's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while WPP trades at $27.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check WPP's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MGNI trades at $24.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 80.53. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MGNI's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MDCA trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MDCA's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ZD trades at $38.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ZD's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while IAS trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check IAS's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CMPR trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 108.03. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check CMPR's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STGW trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -575.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STGW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check STGW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CRTO trades at $24.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check CRTO's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while EEX trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 133.25. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check EEX's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 900.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DLX trades at $20.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check DLX's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 886.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while QNST trades at $15.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is 194.63. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QNST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check QNST's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CCO trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check CCO's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 616M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADV trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ADV's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CTV trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check CTV's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while NCMI trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -20.64. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check NCMI's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while BOC trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 649.50. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check BOC's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while QUOT trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check QUOT's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 372.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STRN trades at $20.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -6738.30. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check STRN's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 365.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SDM trades at $13.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 228.17. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check SDM's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TRMR trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check TRMR's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 314.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while NEXN trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check NEXN's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADTH trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ADTH's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 220.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while QMMM trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -38.60. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check QMMM's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 191.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while WIMI trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check WIMI's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TSQ trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSQ's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check TSQ's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TZOO trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check TZOO's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ATY trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ATY's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while XNET trades at $7.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -144.20. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XNET's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check XNET's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MCHX trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -19.70. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MCHX's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ICLK trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ICLK's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STCN trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check STCN's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while VSME trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check VSME's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CDLX trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -2.79%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check CDLX's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while INUV trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check INUV's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ABLV trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ABLV's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ADTHW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ACCS trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ACCS's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while GSMG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check GSMG's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while FLNT trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check FLNT's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ABLVW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ABLVW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MOXC trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MOXC's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MOBQ trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MOBQ's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SWAG trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check SWAG's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while HHS trades at $3.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check HHS's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while HAO trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check HAO's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MCTR trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MCTR's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ISIG trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ISIG's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CHR trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check CHR's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TNMG trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check TNMG's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while EDHL trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 43.10. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check EDHL's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DRCT trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check DRCT's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while LDWY trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check LDWY's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DMS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMS's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check DMS's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check DRCTW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while BAOS trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check BAOS's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ADVWW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MGOL trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MGOL's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while CNET trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNET's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check CNET's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STRNW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check STRNW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while STFS trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STFS's ROE of +10.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check STFS's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check TRKAW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 505.9K. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SWAGW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check SWAGW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 487.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while SRAX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check SRAX's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 170.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while MOBQW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check MOBQW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check GSMGW's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check DMS-WT's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check ZDVSV's competition here

BOMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BOMN stands at 765M. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOMN is priced at $25.76, while TRKA trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BOMN currently has a P/E ratio of 8.65, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BOMN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BOMN is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOMN.Check TRKA's competition here